Korean J Ophthalmol.  2016 Oct;30(5):344-351. 10.3341/kjo.2016.30.5.344.

Anterior Diabetic Retinopathy Studied by Ultra-widefield Angiography

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. swkang@skku.edu
  • 2Department of Ophthalmology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To evaluate the prevalence of anterior type diabetic retinopathy (DR) using ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography and to identify the factors associated with anterior type DR incidence.
METHODS
A retrospective case review was used in this study. Patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) underwent examination by ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography, and were classified into anterior, posterior, or diffuse DR groups. Anterior DR was defined if diabetic retinal changes were noted only at the location anterior to the imaginary circle bordered by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven-standard fields. Correlations between demographic data, as well as systemic and ocular factors, and the incidence of NPDR types were evaluated.
RESULTS
Among the 234 eyes of 234 patients with NPDR, 25 eyes (10.7%) demonstrated anterior DR. Anterior DR was observed in 10 eyes (30.3%) of patients having mild NPDR, three eyes (4.8%) of moderate NPDR patients, and in 12 eyes (7.1%) of severe NPDR patients (p < 0.001). The incidence of anterior DR positively correlated with lower hemoglobin A1c levels and with greater high-density lipoprotein levels following multiple logistic regression analysis (p < 0.001). The mean hemoglobin A1c level was 7.03 ± 0.99% in anterior DR, 7.99 ± 1.74% in posterior DR, and 7.94 ± 1.39% in diffuse DR patients (p = 0.003). The mean high-density lipoprotein level was 51.2 ± 12.5 mg/dL in anterior, 49.7 ± 15.2 mg/dL in posterior, and 45.2 ± 13.1 mg/dL in diffuse DR patients (p = 0.010).
CONCLUSIONS
Diabetic retinal changes confined to an anterior location were more frequently noted in earlier stages of NPDR. The incidence of DR sparing posterior retinal involvement was related to favorable blood sugar and lipid profiles.

Keyword

Diabetic retinopathy; Fluorescein angiography

MeSH Terms

Angiography*
Blood Glucose
Diabetic Retinopathy*
Fluorescein Angiography
Humans
Incidence
Lipoproteins
Logistic Models
Prevalence
Retinaldehyde
Retrospective Studies
Blood Glucose
Lipoproteins
Retinaldehyde

Figure

  • Fig. 1 The overlaying circle used for classification of the diabetic retinopathy locational type. The circle is presented as a dotted line, encompassing the conventional seven-standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study fields. This case represents moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy with diffuse involvement.

  • Fig. 2 The three types of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (DR): the anterior type of DR (A), the posterior type of DR (B), and the diffuse type of DR (C). If retinal changes were located only outside the overlaying circle, anterior type DR (A) was noted. Conversely, when microvascular changes were limited within the overlaying circle, posterior type DR (B) was assigned. If diabetic retinal changes were noted in both sides of the overlaying circle, diffuse type DR (C) was assigned. Imaginary boundary line (dotted line), which was encompassing the conventional seven-standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study fields (solid line), was used for the classification of anterior or posterior type of diabetic retinopathy.

  • Fig. 3 Anterior diabetic retinopathy (DR) stages: mild non-proliferative anterior DR (A), moderate non-proliferative anterior DR (B), severe non-proliferative anterior DR (C), and proliferative DR with anterior type DR (D). Proliferative DR (D) patients were not enrolled in this study.

  • Fig. 4 The proportion of the diabetic retinopathy types according to stage of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR).


Reference

1. Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy: ETDRS report number 12. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98:5 Suppl. 823–833.
2. Manivannan A, Plskova J, Farrow A, et al. Ultra-wide-field fluorescein angiography of the ocular fundus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 140:525–527.
3. Patel RD, Messner LV, Teitelbaum B, et al. Characterization of ischemic index using ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography in patients with focal and diffuse recalcitrant diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013; 155:1038–1044.e2.
4. Wessel MM, Aaker GD, Parlitsis G, et al. Ultra-wide-field angiography improves the detection and classification of diabetic retinopathy. Retina. 2012; 32:785–791.
5. Ruilope LM, Segura J. Losartan and other angiotensin II antagonists for nephropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review of the clinical trial evidence. Clin Ther. 2003; 25:3044–3064.
6. Malaguarnera G, Gagliano C, Bucolo C, et al. Lipoprotein(a) serum levels in diabetic patients with retinopathy. Biomed Res Int. 2013; 2013:943505.
7. Lyons TJ, Jenkins AJ, Zheng D, et al. Diabetic retinopathy and serum lipoprotein subclasses in the DCCT/EDIC cohort. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45:910–918.
8. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329:977–986.
9. The absence of a glycemic threshold for the development of long-term complications: the perspective of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes. 1996; 45:1289–1298.
10. The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes. 1995; 44:968–983.
11. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE. Relation of glycemic control to diabetic microvascular complications in diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 1996; 124(1 Pt 2):90–96.
12. Toth PP, Simko RJ, Palli SR, et al. The impact of serum lipids on risk for microangiopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012; 11:109.
13. ACCORD Study Group. ACCORD Eye Study Group. Chew EY, et al. Effects of medical therapies on retinopathy progression in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363:233–244.
14. Knowler WC, Bennett PH, Ballintine EJ. Increased incidence of retinopathy in diabetics with elevated blood pressure: a six-year follow-up study in Pima Indians. N Engl J Med. 1980; 302:645–650.
15. Rand LI, Prud'homme GJ, Ederer F, Canner PL. Factors influencing the development of visual loss in advanced diabetic retinopathy: Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) report No. 10. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985; 26:983–991.
16. Janka HU, Warram JH, Rand LI, Krolewski AS. Risk factors for progression of background retinopathy in long-standing IDDM. Diabetes. 1989; 38:460–464.
17. Chew EY, Klein ML, Ferris FL 3rd, et al. Association of elevated serum lipid levels with retinal hard exudate in diabetic retinopathy: Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Report 22. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996; 114:1079–1084.
18. Kaneko Y, Moriyama M, Hirahara S, et al. Areas of nonperfusion in peripheral retina of eyes with pathologic myopia detected by ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55:1432–1439.
Full Text Links
  • KJO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr