J Korean Med Assoc.  2011 Nov;54(11):1154-1163.

The concept of medical professionalism as for self-employed physicians in Korea

• Park HJ

Abstract

Medical professionalism in Korea is underdeveloped because of a strong state that has been in place for the past one hundred years. If the government actively controls policies and regulates the professional associations under state corporatism, deterioration of professionalism is inevitable. The current medical insurance in Korea is unified as a monopsony, but it is not the 'bipartite corporatism' between the government and the medical profession such as the National Health Services (NHS) in Britain. All insurance matters related to a physician's practice, including standards of treatment and the physician's reimbursement, are handled by the government. Therefore, the authority of medical expertise is subordinate to the authority of the government agency, and physicians are forced to follow the goals and policies that are set by the government. Physicians' professional ethics are the core of their occupational control. The declaration of "Codes of Ethics" by the Korean Medical Association, before it was revised in April 2006, defined a "sincere fulfillment in practicing medicine" as a full duty of the physician's life. If this declaration was intended to be interpreted literally, all physicians in Korea could be asked to pursue identical lives with the same goals as their professional life as a physician. If it was not intended to be interpreted literally, then physicians may develop their own ethical approaches according to their individual perspectives on life. The former case is an unethical form of state control while; the latter case would make legitimate occupational regulation impossible. The ideal of medical service is an institutional attribute of an occupation and not a duty of an individual's life. Therefore, it should be possible for physicians to work under an occupational control that requires specific standards for the members of the profession and embodies their professional values.

Keyword

Professionalism; Autonomy; Corporatism; Service orientation; Ethical codes

MeSH Terms

Codes of Ethics
Ethics, Professional
Government Agencies
Hypogonadism
Insurance
Korea
Mitochondrial Diseases
National Health Programs
Occupations
Ophthalmoplegia
Hypogonadism
Mitochondrial Diseases
Ophthalmoplegia

Reference

1. Freidson E. HJ Park . Professionalism. 2007. Seoul: Acanet.

2. Larson MS. Larson MS, editor. An analysis of medicine's professional success. The rise of professionalism: a sociological analysis. 1977. Berkeley: University of California Press;19–39.

3. MacDonald KM. OH Kwon . The sociology of the professions. 1999. Seoul: Ilsinsa.

4. Fox RC. HI Cho . The sociology of the professions. 1999. Seoul: Ilsinsa.

5. Freidson E. Freidson E, editor. Consulting professions in a free society. Profession of medicine. 1988. Chicago: University of Chicago Press;335–382.

6. Johnson T. Giddens A, Mackenzie G, editors. The state and the professions: peculiarities of the British. Social class and the division of labour. 1982. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;186–208.

7. Yang DA. Democratic corporatism. 2005. Seoul: Hyeoneumsa.

8. Frenk J, Duran-Arenas L. Hafferty FW, McKinlay JB, editors. The medical profession and the state. The changing medical profession: an international perspective. 1993. New York: Oxford University Press;25–42.

9. Cho BH. Cho BH, editor. The state and doctors. The sociology of medical affairs. 1999. Daegu: Taeilsa;201–214.

10. Schmitter PC. Schmitter PC, Lehmbruch G, editors. Still the century of corporatism? Trends toward corporatist intermediation. 1979. London: SAGE Publications;7–51.

11. Frenk J, Gonzalez-Block MA. Corporatism and health care: a comparison of Sweden and Mexico. Health Policy. 1992. 21:167–180.

12. Cho BH. The state and physicians in South Korea, 1910-1985: an analysis of professionalization [dissertation]. 1988. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin - Madison.

13. Cleaves PS. Professions and the state: the Mexican cases. 1987. Arizona: The University of Arizona Press.

14. Field MG. Field MG, editor. Introduction. Success and crisis in national health system: a comparative approach. 1989. New York: Routledge;1–22.

15. Goode WJ. Encroachment, charlatanism, and the emerging profession: psychology, sociology, and medicine. Am Sociol Rev. 1960. 25:902–914.

16. Giaimo S. Giaimo S, editor. Health care governance in the British NHS to 1989. Markets and medicine: the politics of health care reform in Britain, Germany and the United States. 2002. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press;31–42.

17. Pavalko RM. Pavalko RM, editor. Models for studying the professions. Sociology of occupations and professions. 1988. Itasca: F. E. Peacock Publishers;17–50.

18. Goode W. Vollmer HM, Mills DL, editors. "Professions" and "non-professions". Professionalization. 1966. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall;33–45.

19. Veatch RM. Veatch RM, editor. The problems with professional physician ethics. A theory of medical ethics. 1981. New York: Basic Books;79–107.

20. Carr-Saunders AM, Wilson PA. Carr-Saunders AM, Wilson PA, editors. The rise and aims of professional associations. The professions. 1933. Oxford: The Clarendon Press;298–304.

21. Siegrist H. Burrage M, Torstendahl R, editors. Professionalization as a process: patterns, progression and discontinuity. Professions in theory and history: rethinking the study of the professions. 1990. London: SAGE Publications;177–202.

22. Im MS. The necessity of reorganization of council on ethics. J Korean Med Assoc. 2001. 44:289–293.

23. Aultman JM. Wear D, Aultman JM, editors. The role of ethics within professionalism inquiry. Professionalism in medicine: critical perspectives. 2006. New York: Springer;129–147.

24. Bassford HA. MacNiven D, editor. Medical ethics. Moral expertise: studies in practical and professional ethics. 1990. New York: Routledge;128–143.

25. Moon CJ. Moon CJ, editor. Doctor-patient relationship. Sociology of health care. 2004. Seoul: Singwang Press;187–211.