J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2014 Jul;55(7):1039-1048.

Comparision between Simultaneous Intracameral and Intravitreal Injection and Intravitreal Injection of Bevacizumab in Neovascular Glaucoma

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea. Maya12kim@naver.com
  • 2Gyeongsang Institute of Health Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To compare the clinical efficacy of simultaneous intracameral and intravitreal injection and intravitreal single injection of bevacizumab in patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG).
METHODS
The medical records of 43 eyes of 43 patients, who had treated with simultaneous intracameral and intravitreal injection (Group I) or intravitreal single injection (Group II) of bevacizumab 1.25 mg from January 2010 to December 2012, were retrospectively reviewed. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), regression time of new vessel in the iris (NVI) and anterior chamber angle (NVA), progression of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS), and corneal parameters were measured preoperatively and one day, three days, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS
There was significant changes of IOP between the two groups at 1, 3 days postoperatively (p = 0.001, p < 0.001). The regression time of NVI and NVA in Group I was significantly faster than Group II (p = 0.026, p = 0.033). In the phakic eyes, regression time of NVI and NVA was significantly longer than aphakic and pseudophakic eyes in group II (p = 0.006, p = 0.005). Also, in the phakic NVG patients, the formation of PAS in Group I was significantly less than in Group II for the postoperative three months (p = 0.020).
CONCLUSIONS
Simultaneous intravitreal and intracameral injection of bevacizumab seem to be more effective for the early lowering of IOP and regression of NVI and NVA, and inhibiting further PAS formation in NVG patients, especially in the phakic eyes. Therefore, simultaneous intracameral and intravitreal injection of bevacizumab may be considered as an adjunct to management of NVG in the phakic eyes.

Keyword

Bevacizumab; Intraocular pressure; Lens; Neovascular glaucoma; Peripheral anterior synechiae

MeSH Terms

Anterior Chamber
Glaucoma, Neovascular*
Humans
Intraocular Pressure
Intravitreal Injections*
Iris
Medical Records
Retrospective Studies
Visual Acuity
Bevacizumab

Figure

  • Figure 1. IOP difference between post-injection and pre-injection in both groups. Group I: simultaneous intravitreal and intracameral bevacizumab injection group; Group II: intravitreal bevacizumab injection group. IOP = intraocular pressure. *Paired t-test, p-value < 0.05.


Reference

References

1. Sivak-Callcott JA, O'Day DM, Gass JD, Tsai JC. Evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108:1767–76.
2. Shazly TA, Latina MA. Neovascular glaucoma: etiology, diagnosis and prognosis. Semin Ophthalmol. 2009; 24:113–21.
Article
3. Aiello LP. Vascular endothelial growth factor and the eye: biochemical mechanisms of action and implications for novel therapies. Ophthal Res. 1997; 29:354–62.
Article
4. Aiello LP, Avery RL, Arrigg PG, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular fluid of patients with diabetic retinopathy and other retinal disorders. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331:1480–7.
Article
5. Tripathi RC, Li J, Tripathi BJ, et al. Increased level of vascular endothelial growth factor in aqueous humor of patients with neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105:232–7.
Article
6. SooHoo JR, Seibold LK, Kahook MY. Recent advances in the management of neovascular glaucoma. Semin Ophthalmol. 2013; 28:165–72.
Article
7. Michels S, Rosenfeld PJ, Puliafito CA, et al. Systemic bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration twelve-week results of an uncontrolled open-label clinical study. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112:1035–47.
8. Spaide RF, Laud K, Fine HF, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab treatment of choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2006; 26:383–90.
Article
9. Rosenfeld PJ, Fung AE, Puliafito CA. Optical coherence tomography findings after an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (avastin) for macular edema from central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2005; 36:336–9.
Article
10. Iturralde D, Spaide RF, Meyerle CB. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment of macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion: a short-term study. Retina. 2006; 26:279–84.
11. Spaide RF, Fisher YL. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy complicated by vitreous hemorrhage. Retina. 2006; 26:275–8.
Article
12. Davidorf FH, Mouser JG, Derick RJ. Rapid improvement of rubeosis iridis from a single bevacizumab (Avastin) injection. Retina. 2006; 26:354–6.
Article
13. Silva Paula J, Jorge R, Alves Costa R, et al. Short-term results of intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) on anterior segment neovascularization in neovascular glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006; 84:556–7.
Article
14. Grisanti S, Biester S, Peters S, et al. Intracameral bevacizumab for iris rubeosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 142:158–60.
Article
15. Mason JO 3rd, Albert MA Jr, Mays A, Vail R. Regression of neovascular iris vessels by intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Retina. 2006; 26:839–41.
Article
16. Ilieve ME, Domig D, Wolf-Schnurrbursch U, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 142:1054–6.
17. Andrijevic’-Derk B, Vatavuk Z, Bencic’ G, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab for neovascular glaucoma. Acta Clin Croat. 2008; 47:175–9.
18. Martinez-Carpio PA, Bonafonte-Marquez E, Heredia-Garcia CD, Bonafonte-Royo S. Efficacy and safety of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma: systematic review. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2008; 83:579–88.
Article
19. L'Esperance FA. Ophthalmic lasers. 3rd ed.1. St Louis: CV Mosby Co.;1989. p. 78–112.
20. Saito Y, Higashide T, Takeda H, et al. Clinical factors related to recurrence of anterior segment neovascularization after treatment including intravitreal bevacizumab. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010; 149:964–72.
Article
21. Brouzas D, Charakidas A, Moschos M, et al. Bevacizumab (Avastin) for the management of anterior chamber neovascularization and neovascular glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2009; 3:685–8.
22. Diabetic Retinopathy Study. Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: the second report of diabetic retinopathy study findings. Ophthalmology. 1978; 85:82–106.
23. Manaviat MR, Rashidi M, Afkhami-Ardekani M, et al. Effect of pan retinal photocoagulation on the serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in diabetic patients. Int Ophthalmol. 2011; 31:271–5.
Article
24. Wolf A, von Jagow B, Ulbig M, Haritoglou C. Intracameral Injection of bevacizumab for the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmologica. 2011; 226:51–6.
Article
25. Yuzbasioglu E, Artunay O, Rasier R, et al. Simultaneous intravitreal and intracameral injection of bevacizumab (Avastin) in neovascular glaucoma. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2009; 25:259–64.
Article
26. Ghanem AA, El-Kannishy AM, El-Wehidy AS, El-Agamy AF. Intravitreal bevacizumab (avastin) as an adjuvant treatment in cases of neovascular glaucoma. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2009; 16:75–9.
Article
27. Bakri SJ, Snyder MR, Reid JM, et al. Pharmacokinetics of intra- vitreal bevacizumab (Avastin). Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:855–9.
28. Matsuyama K, Oqata N, Jo N, et al. Levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and pigment epithelium-derived factor in eyes before and after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2009; 53:243–8.
Article
29. Sheng YH. Vitreous prolapse during cataract surgery. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 1993; 29:27–9.
30. Larsson L, Osterlin S. Retinal vessels in the ora region. Possible role in the vitreo-retinal pathology in aphakia. Acta Ophthalmology. 1981; 59:526–31.
31. Sato T, Morita S, Bando H, et al. Early vitreous hemorrhage after vitrectomy with preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab for pro- liferative diabetic retinopathy. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2013; 20:51–5.
32. Kuiper EJ, Van Nieuwenhoven FA, de Smet MD, et al. The angio-fibrotic switch of VEGF and CTGF in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. PLoS One. 2008; 3:e2675.
Article
33. Widder RA, Lemmen KD, Dietlein TS. Neovascular glaucoma. Klin Monbl Augenheikd. 2010; 227:R15–27.
34. Ehlers JP, Spirn MJ, Lam A, et al. Combination intravitreal bevacizumab/panretinal photocoagulation versus panretinal photo- coagulation alone in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. Retina. 2008; 28:696–702.
35. Rusovici R, Sakhalkar M, Chalam KV. Evaluation of cytotoxicity of bevacizumab on VEGF-enriched corneal endothelial cells. Mol Vis. 2011; 17:3339–46.
36. Chalam KV, Agarwal S, Brar VS, et al. Evaluation of cytotoxic effects of bevacizumab on human corneal cells. Cornea. 2009; 28:328–33.
37. Suh SY, Lee JH, Jun RM. Corneal endothelial change after intravitreal bevacizumab injection. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2010; 51:1549–53.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr