J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2007 Dec;48(12):1614-1622.

Current Trends in the Recognition and Treatment of Dry Eye: A Survey of Ophthalmologists

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea. sara514@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE: Based on the questionnaires for dry eyes in 2006, we have investigated the current status and new trends in the recognition and management of the dry eye.
METHODS
We ask the 15 questionnaires to 197 ophthalmologists. After reorganizing the data based on each questions, we compared the result with the most current studies in Korea and other countries as well. Then, we report the current trends in the diagnosis and treatment of dry eye.
RESULTS
Dry eye patients account for take up about 20-30% of total outpatients and it is currently accepted etiology that dry eye inflammation is related to the function of the immune system. Patient's symptoms and slit lamp examination are important for diagnosis. An anti-inflammatory therapy is needed for patients with moderate to severe dry eye.
CONCLUSIONS
Increasingly, there are positive attitudes toward accepting that persistent dry eye is an inflammatory disease; therefore, there are increases in use of an anti-inflammatory agent for treatment.

Keyword

Dry eye; Dysfunctional tear syndrome; Lacrimal functional unit

MeSH Terms

Diagnosis
Humans
Immune System
Inflammation
Korea
Outpatients
Surveys and Questionnaires

Figure

  • Figure 1. A proportion of dry eye patients in outpatient clinics. Red numbers mean the percentage of respondents. Parenthesized red numbers mean the number of respondents.

  • Figure 2. Most commonly used diagnostic tests for evaluating a patient with probable dry eye. Red numbers mean the percentage of respondents. Parenthesized red numbers mean the number of respondents.

  • Figure 3. The gold diagnostic method for dry eye Red numbers mean the percentage of respondents. Parenthesized red numbers mean the number of respondents.

  • Figure 4. Most useful indicator of improvement in treatment of dry eye. Red numbers mean the percentage of respondents. Parenthesized red numbers mean the number of respondents.


Reference

References

1. Lemp MA. Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes. CL AO J. 1995; 21:221–32.
2. Stern ME, Beuerman RW, Fox RI, et al. The pathology of dry eye: the interaction between the ocular surface and lacrimal glands. Cornea. 1998; 17:584–9.
3. Stern ME, Gao J, Siemasko KF, et al. The role of the lacrimal functional unit in the pathophysiology of dry eye. Exp Eye Res. 2004; 78:409–16.
Article
4. Dana MR, Hamrah P. Role of immunity and inflammation in corneal and ocular surface disease associated with dry eye. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002; 506:729–38.
Article
5. Behrens A, Doule JJ, Stern L, et al. Dysfunctional tear syndrome: a Delphi approach to treatment recommendations. Cornea. 2006; 25:900–7.
6. Schein OD, Munoz B, Tielsch JM, et al. Prevalence of dry eye among the elderly. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997; 124:723–8.
Article
7. Lin PY, Tsai SY, Cheng CY, et al. Prevalence of dry eye among an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:1096–101.
8. Brewitt H, Sistani F. Dry eye disease: the scale of the problem. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001; 45:199–202.
9. Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000; 118:1264–8.
Article
10. Schaumberg DA, Sullivan DA, Buring JE, Dana MR. Prevalence of dry eye syndrome among US women. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 136:318–26.
Article
11. Hikichi T, Yoshida A, Fukui Y, et al. Prevalence of dry eye in Japanese eye centers. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1995; 233:555–8.
Article
12. Lin PY, Tsai SY, Cheng CY, et al. Prevalence of dry eye among an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:1096–101.
13. Stern ME, Beuerman RW, Fox RI, et al. The pathology of dry eye: the interaction between the ocular surface and lacrimal glands. Cornea. 1998; 17:584–9.
14. Kim DK, Song BR. The Concentration of Tear Lysozyme in Normal Subjects and Dry Eye. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1999; 40:2693–700.
15. Puehler W, Rittner HL, Mousa SA, et al. Interleukin-1 beta contributes to the upregulation of kappa opioid receptor mrna in dorsal root ganglia in response to peripheral inflammation. Neuroscience. 2006; (25):141:989–98.
Article
16. Kroemer G, Martinez C. Cytokines and autoimmune disease. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1991; 61:275–95.
Article
17. Rowe D, Griffiths M, Stewart J, et al. HLA class I and II, interferon, interleukin 2, and the interleukin 2 receptor expression on labial biopsy specimens from patients with Sjogren's syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 1987; 46:580–6.
Article
18. Jones DT, Monroy D, Ji Z, et al. Sjogren's syndrome: cytokine and Epstein-Barr viral gene expression within the conjunctival epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994; 35:3493–504.
19. Narayanan S, Miller WL, McDermott AM. Conjunctival cytokine expression in symptomatic moderatedry eye subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47:2445–50.
20. Gao J, Gelber-Schwalb TA, Addeo JV, Stern ME. Apoptosis in the lacrimal gland and conjunctiva of dry eye dogs. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998; 438:453–60.
Article
21. Korb DR. The tear film: its role today and in the future. In : Korb DR, Craig J, Doughty M, editors. The tear film: structure, function and clinical examination. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann;2002. chap. 7.
22. Lee JK, Ki CW, Roh KG. The Significance of the Tear Film Break-up Time (BUT) in the Diagnosis of the Dry Eye Syndrome. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1985; 26:1311–5.
23. Shyn KH, Kim BH, Kim JC. A Study of the Conjunctival Epithelial Changes in Patients with Dry Eye Syndrome by Impression Cytology and Comparisons of Those Results with BUT, Schirmer Test, Rose Bengal Staining. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1994; 35:362–70.
24. Dogru M, Stern ME, Smith JA, et al. Changing trends in the definition and diagnosis of dry eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 140:507–8.
Article
25. Korb DR, Greiner JV, Herman J. Comparison of fluorescein break-up time measurement reproducibility using standard fluorescein strips versus the Dry Eye Test (DET) method. Cornea. 2001; 20:811–5.
Article
26. Dogru M, Ishida K, Matsumoto Y, et al. Strip meniscometry: a new and simple method of tear meniscus evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47:1895–901.
Article
27. Cho BJ, Lee JH, Shim OJ. The Relation Between Clinical Manifestations of Dry Eye Patients and Their BUTs. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1992; 33:297–302.
28. Calonge M. The treatment of dry eye. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001; 452:S227–39.
Article
29. Nelson JD, Farris RL. Sodium hyaluronate and polyvinyl alcohol artificial tear preparations. A comparison in patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988; 106:484–7.
30. Kwon DJ, Park DH, Park D, et al. Clinical Investigation of Therapeutic Effect and Extrusion Rate of Punctal Plug for Dry Eye Syndrome. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2006; 47:1204–11.
31. Jeong SH, Lee YJ, Kim HY, et al. The Relationship between the Dacryoscintigraphy and the Satisfaction with Punctal Occlusion in Patients with Dry Eye Syndrome. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2003; 44:1723–7.
32. Lew HM, Jang JW, Lee EH. The Changes of Tear Osmolarity and Protein After Silicone Punctal Plug Insertion In Dry Eye. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2001; 42:1509–14.
33. Her J, Yu SI, Seo SG. Clinical Effects of Various Antiinflammatory Therapies in Dry Eye Syndrome. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2006; 47:1901–10.
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr