J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2006 May;47(5):771-777.

The Detection of Retinal Never Fiber Layer Defect by Modification of Non-mydriatic Digital Fundus Photograph

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kihopark@snu.ac.kr
  • 2Seoul Artificial Eye Center, Seoul National University Hospital Clinical Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficiency of digital retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) photographs converted from a non-mydriatic digital fundus camera for detecting RNFL defects.
METHODS
Ninety-five eyes were evaluated with both a non-mydriatic digital fundus photograph and a digital RNFL photograph by two glaucoma specialists independently. The red-free, monochrome modified digital fundus photograph was acquired from non-mydriatic digital fundus photographs using Photoshop 7.0. Whether a localized wedge-shaped or diffuse RNFL defect existed or not was evaluated on a non-mydriatic digital fundus photograph and a modified digital fundus photograph, and inter- and intraobserver agreement were also evaluated. Regarding the use of digital RNFL photographs as a standard method, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the two types of photographs.
RESULTS
Interobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa values) about localized RNFL defects observable on digital RNFL photographs, non-mydriatic digital fundus photographs, and modified digital fundus photographs were 0.749, 0.634, and 0.793, respectively, but all were 0.417 or less with regard to diffuse RNFL defects. Regarding localized RNFL defects, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of modified digital fundus photographs were 85.7%, 95.5%, 85.7% and 94.1%, respectively, showing superiority to those of non-mydriatic digital fundus photographs. But, in cases of diffuse RNFL defect, the sensitivity and specificity of modified digital fundus photographs were 60.0% and 97.8%, respectively, indicating no superiority to non-mydriatic digital fundus photographs.
CONCLUSIONS
The localized RNFL defect can be detected more efficiently with modified digital fundus photographs than non-mydriatic digital fundus photographs, but the diffuse RNFL defect cannot.

Keyword

Diffuse retinal nerve fiber layer defect; Modified digital fundus photograph; Non-mydriatic digital fundus photograph; Retinal nerve fiber layer photograph; Wedge-shaped defect

MeSH Terms

Glaucoma
Nerve Fibers
Retinaldehyde*
Sensitivity and Specificity
Specialization
Retinaldehyde
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr