Nutr Res Pract.  2011 Aug;5(4):313-321.

A study of consumers' perceptions and prediction of consumption patterns for generic health functional foods

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Food and Nutrition, Eulji University, Seongnam, Gyunggi 461-723, Korea.
  • 2Major of Hotel Culinary Art, Department of Tourism Information Management, Dong Seoul College, Seongnam, Gyunggi 461-714, Korea.
  • 3Food Standardization Division, Food Standardization Department, Food Safety Bureau, Korea Food & Drug Administration, Osong Health Technology Administration Complex, Chungcheong 363-951, Korea.
  • 4Functional Food Standardization Division, Food Standardization Department, Food Safety Bureau, Korea Food & Drug Administration, Osong Health Technology Administration Complex, Chungcheong 363-951, Korea.
  • 5Department Food Science and Nutrition, Dankook University, 126 Jukjeon-dong, Suji-gu, Yongin, Gyunggi 448-701, Korea. wkkim@dankook.ac.kr

Abstract

The Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA) revised the Health Functional Food Act in 2008 and extended the form of health functional foods to general food types. Therefore, this study was performed to investigate consumers' perceptions of the expanded form of health functional food and to predict consumption patterns. For this study, 1,006 male and female adults aged 19 years and older were selected nationwide by multi-stage stratified random sampling and were surveyed in 1:1 interviews. The questionnaire survey was conducted by Korea Gallup. The subjects consisted of 497 (49.4%) males and 509 (50.6%) females. About 57.9% of the subjects recognized the KFDA's permission procedures for health functional foods. Regarding the health functional foods that the subjects had consumed, red ginseng products were the highest (45.3%), followed by nutritional supplements (34.9%), ginseng products (27.9%), lactobacillus-containing products (21.0%), aloe products (20.3%), and Japanese apricot extract products (18.4%). Opinions on expanding the form of health functional foods to general food types scored 4.7 points on a 7-point scale, showing positive responses. In terms of the effects of medicine-type health functional foods versus generic health functional foods, the highest response was 'same effects if the same ingredients are contained' at a rate of 34.7%. For intake frequency by food type, the response of 'daily consistent intake' was 31.7% for capsules, tablets, and pills, and 21.7% for extracts. For general food types, 'daily consistent intake' was 44.5% for rice and 22.8% for beverages, which were higher rates than those for medicine types. From the above results, consumers had positive opinions of the expansion of health functional foods to generic forms but are not expected to maintain accurate intake frequencies or amounts. Thus, continuous promotion and education are needed for proper intake of generic health functional foods.

Keyword

Health functional foods; generic functional food; consumers' perception; consumption pattern; health claim

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged
Aloe
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
Beverages
Capsules
Female
Functional Food
Humans
Korea
Male
Panax
Prunus armeniaca
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tablets
United States Food and Drug Administration
Capsules
Tablets

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Food types according to the health claims of health functional foods


Reference

1. Korea National Statistical Office. Population projections for Korea: 2005-2050. 2006. p. 2005–2050.
2. Hel KO, Lee EH, Kim SW, Kim KJ, Cha KO. Consumer's Trend and Market. 2006. Seoul: Kyomunsa;p. 79–89.
3. Lee SY. Trends and prospect in market of health functional food. Food Sci Ind. 2007; 40:16–20.
4. Korea Food and Drug Administration. A Study for Improving Food & Drug Statistical Year Book. 2007.
5. Kim JY. Current status of health/functional food-past, present and the future. Safe Food. 2008; 3:6–11.
6. Functional ingredients. Korea Food and Drug Administration [Internet]. cited 2009 Jun 09. Available from: http://hfoodi.kfda.go.kr/material/mat2_list.jsp?cateIdx=22.
7. Food with health claims, food for special dietary uses, and nutrition labeling. Ministry of Helath, Labor and Welfare, Japan [Internet]. cited 2009 Dec 11. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/topics/foodsafety/fhc/index.html.
8. Park JH, Kwon OO. A study on consumption behavior of health functional food. Korean J Food Mark Econ. 2007; 24:43–57.
9. KFDA approval procedure for health functional food. Korea Food and Drug Administration [Internet]. cited 2009 Jun 09. Available from: http://hfoodi.kfda.go.kr/material/material.jsp?cateIdx=57.
10. Kim H, Kim M. A study on health-functional foods intake pattern of consumers in Busan and Gyeongnam region. J Korean Living Sci Assoc. 2006; 15:341–352.
11. Ministry of Health & Welfare. Report of National Health and Nutrition Survey 2007. 2008.
12. Kim SH. A study on the use of health functional foods and its related influencing factors of university students in Korea. Korean J Food Cult. 2010; 25:150–159.
13. Kim WY. Tolerable upper Intake Levels for Vitamins and Minerals in Functional Foods for Health (Vitamins and Minerals I) 04052KFDA124. 2004.
14. Jeoug SJ. Plan of information service publicity through the survey on the consumer's usage and recognition of functional food. 2007. Anseong: Chung-Ang University;[master's thesis].
Full Text Links
  • NRP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr