Ann Rehabil Med.  2016 Apr;40(2):214-222. 10.5535/arm.2016.40.2.214.

The Impact of Acute Phase Domain-Specific Cognitive Function on Post-stroke Functional Recovery

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. ideale1@snu.ac.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To assess whether the cognitive function in the acute stage evaluated by domain-specific neuropsychological assessments would be an independent predictor of functional outcome after stroke.
METHODS
Forty patients underwent 4 domain-specific neuropsychological examinations about 3 weeks after the onset of stroke. The tests included the Boston Naming Test (BNT), the construction recall test (CRT), the construction praxis test (CPT), and the verbal fluency test (VFT). The Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI) at 3 months and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6 months were investigated as functional outcome after stroke. Functional improvement was assessed using the change in K-MBI during the first 3 months and subjects were dichotomized into 'good status' and 'poor status' according to mRS at 6 months. The domain-specific cognitive function along with other possible predictors for functional outcome was examined using regression analysis.
RESULTS
The z-score of CPT (p=0.044) and CRT (p<0.001) were independent predictors for functional improvement measured by the change in K-MBI during the first 3 months after stroke. The z-score of CPT (p=0.049) and CRT (p=0.048) were also independent predictors of functional status at post-stroke 6 months assessed by mRS.
CONCLUSION
Impairment in visuospatial construction and memory within one month after stroke can be an independent prognostic factor of functional outcome. Domain-specific neuropsychological assessments could be considered in patients with stroke in the acute phase to predict long-term functional outcome.

Keyword

Memory; Stroke; Cognition; Rehabilitation; Patient outcome assessment

MeSH Terms

Cognition
Humans
Memory
Patient Outcome Assessment
Rehabilitation
Stroke

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Subjects with severe cognitive deficit (z-score<–1.65) in certain domains among 4 domains, which were speech and language, visuospatial memory, visuospatial construction ability, and executive function were counted. Bar graph showed that the subjects with hemorrhagic stroke tended to have a higher number of severely impaired cognitive domains. (A) Ischemic stroke and (B) hemorrhage stroke.


Cited by  2 articles

The Korean Version of the Cognitive Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (K-CASP): A Reliability and Validity Study
Kwon-Hee Park, Hee-Won Lee, Kee-Boem Park, Jin-Youn Lee, Ah-Ra Cho, Hyun-Mi Oh, Joo Hyun Park
Ann Rehabil Med. 2017;41(3):362-375.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.3.362.

Correlation Between Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Functional Outcome in Subacute Stroke Patients With Cognitive Dysfunction
Kil-Byung Lim, Jiyong Kim, Hong-Jae Lee, JeeHyun Yoo, Eun-Cheol You, Joongmo Kang
Ann Rehabil Med. 2018;42(1):26-34.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2018.42.1.26.


Reference

1. Weimar C, Konig IR, Kraywinkel K, Ziegler A, Diener HC. German Stroke Study Collaboration. Age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score within 6 hours after onset are accurate predictors of outcome after cerebral ischemia: development and external validation of prognostic models. Stroke. 2004; 35:158–162. PMID: 14684776.
2. Hankey GJ, Jamrozik K, Broadhurst RJ, Forbes S, Anderson CS. Long-term disability after first-ever stroke and related prognostic factors in the Perth Community Stroke Study, 1989-1990. Stroke. 2002; 33:1034–1040. PMID: 11935057.
Article
3. Thijs VN, Lansberg MG, Beaulieu C, Marks MP, Moseley ME, Albers GW. Is early ischemic lesion volume on diffusion-weighted imaging an independent predictor of stroke outcome? A multivariable analysis. Stroke. 2000; 31:2597–2602. PMID: 11062281.
4. Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Parsey C, Cook DJ. Cognitive correlates of functional performance in older adults: comparison of self-report, direct observation, and performance-based measures. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011; 17:853–864. PMID: 21729400.
Article
5. Atkinson HH, Rosano C, Simonsick EM, Williamson JD, Davis C, Ambrosius WT, et al. Cognitive function, gait speed decline, and comorbidities: the health, aging and body composition study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007; 62:844–850. PMID: 17702875.
Article
6. van Hooren SA, van Boxtel MP, Valentijn SA, Bosma H, Ponds RW, Jolles J. Influence of cognitive functioning on functional status in an older population: 3- and 6-year follow-up of the Maastricht Aging Study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005; 20:883–888. PMID: 16116574.
Article
7. Hill RD, Backman L, Fratiglioni L. Determinants of functional abilities in dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995; 43:1092–1097. PMID: 7560697.
Article
8. Green MF, Kern RS, Heaton RK. Longitudinal studies of cognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: implications for MATRICS. Schizophr Res. 2004; 72:41–51. PMID: 15531406.
Article
9. Kalmar JH, Gaudino EA, Moore NB, Halper J, Deluca J. The relationship between cognitive deficits and everyday functional activities in multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychology. 2008; 22:442–449. PMID: 18590356.
Article
10. Bahar-Fuchs A, Clare L, Woods B. Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation for mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 6:CD003260. PMID: 23740535.
Article
11. Subramaniam K, Luks TL, Fisher M, Simpson GV, Nagarajan S, Vinogradov S. Computerized cognitive training restores neural activity within the reality monitoring network in schizophrenia. Neuron. 2012; 73:842–853. PMID: 22365555.
Article
12. Motl RW, Sandroff BM, Benedict RH. Cognitive dysfunction and multiple sclerosis: developing a rationale for considering the efficacy of exercise training. Mult Scler. 2011; 17:1034–1040. PMID: 21685231.
Article
13. Rasquin SM, Lodder J, Ponds RW, Winkens I, Jolles J, Verhey FR. Cognitive functioning after stroke: a oneyear follow-up study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2004; 18:138–144. PMID: 15211068.
Article
14. Sachdev PS, Brodaty H, Valenzuela MJ, Lorentz LM, Koschera A. Progression of cognitive impairment in stroke patients. Neurology. 2004; 63:1618–1623. PMID: 15534245.
Article
15. Desmond DW, Moroney JT, Sano M, Stern Y. Recovery of cognitive function after stroke. Stroke. 1996; 27:1798–1803. PMID: 8841333.
Article
16. Galski T, Bruno RL, Zorowitz R, Walker J. Predicting length of stay, functional outcome, and aftercare in the rehabilitation of stroke patients: the dominant role of higher-order cognition. Stroke. 1993; 24:1794–1800. PMID: 8248957.
Article
17. Larson EB, Kirschner K, Bode RK, Heinemann AW, Clorfene J, Goodman R. Brief cognitive assessment and prediction of functional outcome in stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003; 9:10–21. PMID: 14523696.
Article
18. van Zandvoort MJ, Kessels RP, Nys GM, de Haan EH, Kappelle LJ. Early neuropsychological evaluation in patients with ischaemic stroke provides valid information. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2005; 107:385–392. PMID: 16023532.
Article
19. Nys GM, van Zandvoort MJ, de Kort PL, van der Worp HB, Jansen BP, Algra A, et al. The prognostic value of domain-specific cognitive abilities in acute first-ever stroke. Neurology. 2005; 64:821–827. PMID: 15753416.
Article
20. Wagle J, Farner L, Flekkoy K, Bruun Wyller T, Sandvik L, Fure B, et al. Early post-stroke cognition in stroke rehabilitation patients predicts functional outcome at 13 months. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2011; 31:379–387. PMID: 21720162.
Article
21. Paker N, Bugdayci D, Tekdos D, Kaya B, Dere C. Impact of cognitive impairment on functional outcome in stroke. Stroke Res Treat. 2010; 2010:652612. PMID: 20798755.
Article
22. Marchina S, Zhu LL, Norton A, Zipse L, Wan CY, Schlaug G. Impairment of speech production predicted by lesion load of the left arcuate fasciculus. Stroke. 2011; 42:2251–2256. PMID: 21719773.
Article
23. Ozdemir F, Birtane M, Tabatabaei R, Ekuklu G, Kokino S. Cognitive evaluation and functional outcome after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 80:410–415. PMID: 11399001.
24. Nys GM, van Zandvoort MJ, de Kort PL, Jansen BP, Kappelle LJ, de Haan EH. Restrictions of the Mini-Mental State Examination in acute stroke. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005; 20:623–629. PMID: 15939186.
Article
25. Lee DY, Lee KU, Lee JH, Kim KW, Jhoo JH, Kim SY, et al. A normative study of the CERAD neuropsychological assessment battery in the Korean elderly. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004; 10:72–81. PMID: 14751009.
Article
26. Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. III: Diagnosis and treatment. Scott Med J. 1957; 2:254–268. PMID: 13432842.
Article
27. Barnes C, Conner D, Legault L, Reznickova N, Harrison-Felix C. Rehabilitation outcomes in cognitively impaired patients admitted to skilled nursing facilities from the community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85:1602–1607. PMID: 15468018.
Article
28. Patel M, Coshall C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Natural history of cognitive impairment after stroke and factors associated with its recovery. Clin Rehabil. 2003; 17:158–166. PMID: 12625656.
Article
29. Heruti RJ, Lusky A, Dankner R, Ring H, Dolgopiat M, Barell V, et al. Rehabilitation outcome of elderly patients after a first stroke: effect of cognitive status at admission on the functional outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83:742–749. PMID: 12048650.
Article
30. Kong KH, Lee J. Temporal recovery of activities of daily living in the first year after ischemic stroke: a prospective study of patients admitted to a rehabilitation unit. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014; 35:221–226. PMID: 24990018.
Article
31. Knoflach M, Matosevic B, Rucker M, Furtner M, Mair A, Wille G, et al. Functional recovery after ischemic stroke: a matter of age: data from the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry. Neurology. 2012; 78:279–285. PMID: 22238419.
32. Li KY, Lin KC, Wang TN, Wu CY, Huang YH, Ouyang P. Ability of three motor measures to predict functional outcomes reported by stroke patients after rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation. 2012; 30:267–275. PMID: 22672940.
Article
33. Dick JP, Guiloff RJ, Stewart A, Blackstock J, Bielawska C, Paul EA, et al. Mini-mental state examination in neurological patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984; 47:496–499. PMID: 6736981.
Article
34. Hocker SE, Britton JW, Mandrekar JN, Wijdicks EF, Rabinstein AA. Predictors of outcome in refractory status epilepticus. JAMA Neurol. 2013; 70:72–77. PMID: 23318514.
Article
35. Karamchandani RR, Fletcher JJ, Pandey AS, Rajajee V. Incidence of delayed seizures, delayed cerebral ischemia and poor outcome with the use of levetiracetam versus phenytoin after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci. 2014; 21:1507–1513. PMID: 24919470.
Article
36. Malouin F, Belleville S, Richards CL, Desrosiers J, Doyon J. Working memory and mental practice outcomes after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85:177–183. PMID: 14966700.
Article
37. Gottesman RF, Hillis AE. Predictors and assessment of cognitive dysfunction resulting from ischaemic stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2010; 9:895–905. PMID: 20723846.
Article
38. Laska AC, Hellblom A, Murray V, Kahan T, Von Arbin M. Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. J Intern Med. 2001; 249:413–422. PMID: 11350565.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr