Ann Rehabil Med.  2012 Apr;36(2):173-181. 10.5535/arm.2012.36.2.173.

The Relationship between Cross Sectional Area and Strength of Back Muscles in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, Dongguk University, Goyang 410-773, Korea. liebe0502@nate.com

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the relationship between the cross sectional area (CSA) and isokinetic strength of the back muscles in patients with chronic low back pain. METHOD: Data of twenty-eight middle-aged patients with chronic back pain were analyzed retrospectively. CSAs of both paraspinal muscles and the disc at the L4-L5 level were measured in MRI axial images and the relative CSAs (rCSA: CSA ratio of muscle and disc) were calculated. The degree of paraspinal muscle atrophy was rated qualitatively. Isokinetic strengths (peak torque, peak torque per body weight) of back flexor and extensor were measured with the isokinetic testing machine. Multiple regression analysis with backward elimination was used to evaluate relations between isokinetic strength and various factors, such as CSA or rCSA and clinical characteristics in all patients. The same analysis was repeated in the female patients.
RESULTS
In analysis with CSA and clinical characteristics, body mass index (BMI) and CSA were significant influencing factors in the peak torque of the back flexor muscles. CSA was a significant influencing factor in the peak torque of total back muscles. In analysis with rCSA and clinical characteristics, BMI was significant in influencing the peak torque of the back flexors. In female patients, rCSA was a significant influencing factor in the peak torque per body weight of the back flexors, and age and BMI were influencing factors in the peak torque of back flexors and total back muscles.
CONCLUSION
In middle-aged patients with chronic low back pain, CSA and rCSA were influencing factors in the strength of total back muscles and back flexors. Also, gender and BMI were influencing factors.

Keyword

Low back pain; Muscle strength; Muscle strength dynamometer; Magnetic resonance imaging

MeSH Terms

Back Pain
Body Mass Index
Body Weight
Female
Humans
Low Back Pain
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Muscle Strength
Muscle Strength Dynamometer
Muscles
Muscular Atrophy
Retrospective Studies
Torque

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Cross sectional area of paraspinal muscles. T1 axial images obtained at the L4-L5 level, showing the lumbar paraspinal muscles. MF: Multifidus muscle, ES: Erector spinae muscle, PS: Psoas muscle, Disc: Intervertebral disc, MF+ES: Paraspinal muscle.

  • Fig. 2 Biodex® isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex Corporation, New York, USA). The fixed axis of the machine was aligned with the subject's anterior superior iliac supine (ASIS). Spinal range of motion was not limited. The angular velocity was set at 60°/sec.


Cited by  3 articles

Changes of Paraspinal Muscles in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Spinal Compression Fractures: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Jong Yun Kim, Soo Uk Chae, Gang Deuk Kim, Myoung Soo Cha
J Bone Metab. 2013;20(2):75-81.    doi: 10.11005/jbm.2013.20.2.75.

Asymmetric Atrophy of Paraspinal Muscles in Patients With Chronic Unilateral Lumbar Radiculopathy
Jinmann Chon, Hee-Sang Kim, Jong Ha Lee, Seung Don Yoo, Dong Hwan Yun, Dong Hwan Kim, Seung Ah Lee, Yoo Jin Han, Hyun Seok Lee, Young Rok Han, Seonyoung Han, Yong Kim
Ann Rehabil Med. 2017;41(5):801-807.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.5.801.

Reliability and Validity of a New Method for Isometric Back Extensor Strength Evaluation Using A Hand-Held Dynamometer
Hee-won Park, Sora Baek, Hong Young Kim, Jung-Gyoo Park, Eun Kyoung Kang
Ann Rehabil Med. 2017;41(5):793-800.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.5.793.


Reference

1. Carpenter DM, Nelson BW. Low back strengthening for the prevention and treatment of low back pain. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999; 31:18–24. PMID: 9927005.
Article
2. Lewis JS, Hewitt JS, Billington L, Cole S, Byng J, Karayiannis S. A randomized clinical trial comparing two physiotherapy interventions for chronic low back pain. Spine. 2005; 30:711–721. PMID: 15803071.
Article
3. Park YJ, Choi KS, Lee SG. Effect of lumbar extensor strengthening in chronic low back pain patients. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2000; 24:295–300.
4. Akuthota V, Nadler SF. Core strengthening. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85(3 Suppl 1):S86–S92. PMID: 15034861.
5. Danneels LA, Vanderstraeten GG, Cambier DC, Witvrouw EE, De Cuyper HJ. CT imaging of trunk muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects. Eur Spine J. 2000; 9:266–272. PMID: 11261613.
Article
6. Risch SV, Norvell NK, Pollock ML, Risch ED, Langer H, Fulton M, Graves JE, Leggett SH. Lumbar strengthening in chronic low back pain patients. Physiologic and psychologic benefits. Spine. 1993; 18:232–238. PMID: 8185727.
7. Cholewicki J, McGill SM. Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic low back pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1996; 11:1–15.
Article
8. O'Sullivan PB, Burnett A, Floyd AN, Gadsdon K, Logiudice J, Miller D, Quirke H. Lumbar repositioning deficit in a specific low back pain population. Spine. 2003; 28:1074–1079. PMID: 12768152.
9. Cassisi JE, Robinson ME, O'Conner P, MacMillan M. Trunk strength and lumbar paraspinal muscle activity during isometric exercise in chronic low back pain patients and controls. Spine. 1993; 18:245–251. PMID: 8441940.
10. Mandell PJ, Weitz E, Bernstein JI, Lipton MH, Morris J, Bradshaw D, Bodkin KP, Mattmiller B. Isokinetic trunk strength and lifting strength measures. Differences and similarities between low-back-injured and non injured workers. Spine. 1993; 18:2491–2501. PMID: 8303453.
11. Maughan RJ. Relationship between muscle strength and muscle cross-sectional area. Implications for training. Sports Med. 1984; 1:263–269. PMID: 6568749.
12. Storheim K, Holm I, Gunderson R, Brox JI, Bo K. The effect of comprehensive group training on cross-sectional area, density, and strength of paraspinal muscles in patients sick-listed for subacute low back pain. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003; 16:271–279. PMID: 12792342.
Article
13. Mannion AF, Käser L, Weber E, Rhyner A, Dvorak J, Müntener M. Influence of age and duration of symptoms on fiber type distribution and size of the back muscles in chronic low back pain patients. Eur Spine J. 2000; 9:273–281. PMID: 11261614.
14. Thorstensson A, Arvidon A. Trunk muscle strength and low back pain. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1982; 14:69–75. PMID: 6213035.
15. Ripamonti M, Colin D, Rahmani A. Torque-velocity and power-velocity relationship during isokinetic trunk flexion and extension. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008; 23:520–526.
16. Mayer TG, Vanharanta H, Gatchel RJ, Mooney V, Barnes D, Judge L, Smith S, Terry A. Comparison of CT scan muscle measurement and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative patients. Spine. 1989; 14:33–36. PMID: 2913665.
17. Reid JG, Costigan PA. Trunk muscle balance and muscular force. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987; 12:783–786. PMID: 2961091.
Article
18. Keller A, Johansen JG, Hellensness J, Brox JI. Predictors of isokinetic back muscle strength in patients with low back pain. Spine. 1999; 24:275–280. PMID: 10025023.
Article
19. Kang CH, Shin MJ, Kim SM, Lee SH, Lee CS. MRI of paraspinal muscles in lumbar degenerative kyphosis patients and control patients with chronic low back pain. Clin Radiol. 2007; 62:479–486. PMID: 17398274.
Article
20. Lee JC, Cha JG, Kim Y, Kim YI, Shin BJ. Quantitative analysis of back muscle degeneration in the patients with the degenerative lumbar flat back using a digital image analysis: comparison with the normal controls. Spine. 2008; 33:318–325. PMID: 18303466.
21. Parkkola R, Kormano M. Lumbar disc and back muscle degeneration on MRI: correlation to age and body mass. J Spinal Disord. 1992; 5:86–92. PMID: 1571617.
22. Ropponen A, Videman T, Battié MC. The reliability of paraspinal muscles composition measurements using routine spine MRI and their association with back function. Man Ther. 2008; 13:349–356. PMID: 17556006.
Article
23. Karatas GK, Gogus F, Meray J. Reliability of isokinetic trunk muscle strength measurement. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 81:79–85. PMID: 11807340.
24. Thistle HG, Hislop HJ, Maffroid M, Lowman EW. Isokinetic contraction: a new concept of resistive exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1967; 48:279–282. PMID: 6026595.
25. Parkkola R, Rytökoski U, Kormano M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the discs and trunk muscles in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy control subjects. Spine. 1993; 18:830–836. PMID: 8316880.
Article
26. Gibbons LE, Latikka P, Videman T, Manninen H, Battié MC. The association of trunk muscle cross-sectional area and magnetic resonance image parameters with isokinetic and psychophysical lifting strength and static back muscle endurance in men. J Spinal Disord. 1997; 10:398–403. PMID: 9355056.
Article
27. Brukner P, Khan K. Clinical sports medicine. 2010. 3rd ed. North Ryde: McGraw-Hill Australia;p. 158–161.
28. Bergmark A. Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1989; 230:1–5. PMID: 2658468.
29. Barr KP, Griggs M, Cadby T. Lumbar stabilization: a review of core concepts and current literature. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 86:72–80. PMID: 17304690.
30. Rantanen J, Hurme M, Flank B, Alaranta H, Nykvist F, Lehto M, Einola S, Kalimo H. The lumbar multifidus muscle five years after surgery for a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine. 1993; 18:568–574. PMID: 8484147.
Article
31. Mannion AF, Dumas GA, Cooper RG, Espinosa FJ, Faris MW, Stevenson JM. Muscle fiber size and type distribution in thoracic and lumbar regions of erector spinae in healthy subjects without low back pain: normal values and sex differences. J Anat. 1997; 190:505–513. PMID: 9183674.
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr