Allergy Asthma Respir Dis.  2013 Jun;1(2):157-163. 10.4168/aard.2013.1.2.157.

Comparison of respiratory disease by human metapneumovirus and respiratory syncytial virus in children

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. pedjsyoon@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
Human metapneumovirus (hMPV) is known to result in clinical manifestation similar to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in children. But some recent studies showed different features. This study compared the clinical manifestation of respiratory disease between hMPV and RSV.
METHODS
A total of 801 children who admitted to Seoul St. Mary's Hospital for respiratory infection from January to June, 2012 were enrolled. Respiratory viral polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using nasopharyngeal swab was performed in all children. We grouped hMPV positive children and RSV positive children and compared clinical features between them by retrospective chart review.
RESULTS
Among 801 children, 365 showed one virus PCR positive with 44 showing hMPV and 41 showing RSV. Respiratory diseases were upper respiratory infection, acute bronchitis, acute bronchiolitis and pneumonia. The peak season was March and April for hMPV and February and March for RSV. Fever incidence, fever duration and neutrophil percent of complete blood cell count were higher in hMPV group than RSV group (P<0.05). The mean age of hMPV group was higher than RSV group (P<0.05). But in acute bronchiolitis children, there was no mean age difference between two group. Acute bronchiolitis incidence declined with increased age for both group (P<0.05). The hMPV group showed relatively lower bronchiolitis and higher pneumonia incidence than RSV group, suggesting relation with age.
CONCLUSION
Respiratory infection by hMPV developed at late winter and spring, slightly later than RSV and at older age. The lower incidence of acute bronchiolitis for hMPV infection than RSV is maybe due to older age than RSV.

Keyword

Human metapneumovirus; Respiratory syncytial virus; Respiratory disease; Child

MeSH Terms

Blood Cell Count
Bronchiolitis
Bronchitis
Child
Fever
Humans
Incidence
Metapneumovirus
Neutrophils
Pneumonia
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Respiratory Syncytial Viruses
Retrospective Studies
Seasons
Viruses

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Outline of participants of our study. The 801 patients who admitted for the respiratory sign and symptom with their initial respiratory viral polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using nasopharyngeal swab were enrolled (except immune compromised patients). Of 365 patients having one respiratory viral PCR positive, 44 patients with human metapneumovirus (hMPV) and 41 patients with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) were enrolled, excluding 280 patients with other respiratory viruses.

  • Fig. 2 Prevalence of human metapneumovirus (hMPV), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and other virus (influenza virus A, B, parainfluenza virus 1, 2, 3, rhinovirus, adenovirus, coronavirus, bocavirus) isolates from January to June, 2012. This shows that incidence of RSV infection was relatively higher at February and March and that of hMPV was slightly later at March and April.

  • Fig. 3 Distribution of clinical diagnosis. This shows that there was no significant difference of respiratory diagnosis between human metapneumovirus (hMPV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and they induced lower respiratory tract infection mainly. This also shows priority of RSV bronchiolitis at less than 6 months and hMPV pneumonia at more than 25 months. URI, upper respiratory infection.

  • Fig. 4 Comparison of mean age between patients infected with human metapneumovirus (hMPV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) at peak season (hMPV, March and April; RSV, February and March) and that between patients infected with hMPV and RSV having bronchiolitis. This suggests that if there were difference of bronchiolitis incidence between two group, it could be explained not by properties of virus infection itself but by commonly involved age.

  • Fig. 5 Comparison of bronchiolitis incidence in patients infected with human metapneumovirus (hMPV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) at each age subgroup. This shows no significant difference of bronchiolitis incidence between hMPV and RSV at each age subgroup. Test for trend statistics shows bronchiolitis incidence decreased with increased age in both hMPV and RSV group (P<0.05).


Reference

1. Mathers CD, Lopez AD, Murray CJL. The burden of disease and mortality by condition: data, methods, and results for 2001. In : Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJL, editors. Global burden of disease and risk factors. Washington: World Bank;2006. p. 45–93.
2. Papenburg J, Hamelin ME, Ouhoummane N, Carbonneau J, Ouakki M, Raymond F, et al. Comparison of risk factors for human metapneumovirus and respiratory syncytial virus disease severity in young children. J Infect Dis. 2012; 206:178–189.
Article
3. Boyce TG, Mellen BG, Mitchel EF Jr, Wright PF, Griffin MR. Rates of hospitalization for respiratory syncytial virus infection among children in medicaid. J Pediatr. 2000; 137:865–870.
Article
4. van den Hoogen BG, de Jong JC, Groen J, Kuiken T, de Groot R, Fouchier RA, et al. A newly discovered human pneumovirus isolated from young children with respiratory tract disease. Nat Med. 2001; 7:719–724.
Article
5. Freymouth F, Vabret A, Legrand L, Eterradossi N, Lafay-Delaire F, Brouard J, et al. Presence of the new human metapneumovirus in French children with bronchiolitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003; 22:92–94.
Article
6. Marguet C, Lubrano M, Gueudin M, Le Roux P, Deschildre A, Forget C, et al. In very young infants severity of acute bronchiolitis depends on carried viruses. PLoS One. 2009; 4:e4596.
Article
7. Kim YK, Kim JW, Wee YS, Yoo EG, Han MY. Clinical features of human metapneumovirus and respiratory syncytial virus infection in hospitalized children. Pediatr Allergy Respir Dis. 2009; 19:12–19.
8. Wolf DG, Greenberg D, Shemer-Avni Y, Givon-Lavi N, Bar-Ziv J, Dagan R. Association of human metapneumovirus with radiologically diagnosed community-acquired alveolar pneumonia in young children. J Pediatr. 2010; 156:115–120.
Article
9. Hall CB, Weinberg GA, Iwane MK, Blumkin AK, Edwards KM, Staat MA, et al. The burden of respiratory syncytial virus infection in young children. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360:588–598.
Article
10. Papenburg J, Boivin G. The distinguishing features of human metapneumovirus and respiratory syncytial virus. Rev Med Virol. 2010; 20:245–260.
Article
11. Manoha C, Espinosa S, Aho SL, Huet F, Pothier P. Epidemiological and clinical features of hMPV, RSV and RVs infections in young children. J Clin Virol. 2007; 38:221–226.
Article
12. Wolf DG, Greenberg D, Kalkstein D, Shemer-Avni Y, Givon-Lavi N, Saleh N, et al. Comparison of human metapneumovirus, respiratory syncytial virus and influenza A virus lower respiratory tract infections in hospitalized young children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006; 25:320–324.
Article
13. Jeong JH, Moon KH, Lee CW, Choi DY, Oh YG, Yoon HS, et al. Lower respiratory tract infection of positive antigen test for respiratory syncytial virus on children under 2 years of age. Korean J Pediatr. 2006; 49:394–400.
Article
14. Kim CK, Choi J, Callaway Z, Kim HB, Chung JY, Koh YY, et al. Clinical and epidemiological comparison of human metapneumovirus and respiratory syncytial virus in seoul, Korea, 2003-2008. J Korean Med Sci. 2010; 25:342–347.
Article
15. Garcia-Garcia ML, Calvo C, Martin F, Perez-Brena P, Acosta B, Casas I. Human metapneumovirus infections in hospitalised infants in Spain. Arch Dis Child. 2006; 91:290–295.
Article
16. Yeom HH, Park JS, Jeong DJ, Kim CJ, Kim YB, Lee DH, et al. Human metapneumovirus infection in Korean children. Korean J Pediatr. 2006; 49:401–409.
Article
17. Bastien N, Ward D, Van Caeseele P, Brandt K, Lee SH, McNabb G, et al. Human metapneumovirus infection in the Canadian population. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41:4642–4646.
Article
18. van den Hoogen BG, Osterhaus DM, Fouchier RA. Clinical impact and diagnosis of human metapneumovirus infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004; 23:1 Suppl. S25–S32.
Article
19. Jartti T, van den Hoogen B, Garofalo RP, Osterhaus AD, Ruuskanen O. Metapneumovirus and acute wheezing in children. Lancet. 2002; 360:1393–1394.
Article
20. Williams JV, Harris PA, Tollefson SJ, Halburnt-Rush LL, Pingsterhaus JM, Edwards KM, et al. Human metapneumovirus and lower respiratory tract disease in otherwise healthy infants and children. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350:443–450.
Article
21. Hamelin ME, Abed Y, Boivin G. Human metapneumovirus: a new player among respiratory viruses. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 38:983–990.
Article
22. Maggi F, Pifferi M, Vatteroni M, Fornai C, Tempestini E, Anzilotti S, et al. Human metapneumovirus associated with respiratory tract infections in a 3-year study of nasal swabs from infants in Italy. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41:2987–2991.
Article
23. Kahn JS. Epidemiology of human metapneumovirus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006; 19:546–557.
Article
24. Vicente D, Montes M, Cilla G, Perez-Yarza EG, Perez-Trallero E. Differences in clinical severity between genotype A and genotype B human metapneumovirus infection in children. Clin Infect Dis. 2006; 42:e111–e113.
Article
25. Hamelin ME, Prince GA, Gomez AM, Kinkead R, Boivin G. Human metapneumovirus infection induces long-term pulmonary inflammation associated with airway obstruction and hyperresponsiveness in mice. J Infect Dis. 2006; 193:1634–1642.
Article
26. Kukavica-Ibrulj I, Hamelin ME, Prince GA, Gagnon C, Bergeron Y, Bergeron MG, et al. Infection with human metapneumovirus predisposes mice to severe pneumococcal pneumonia. J Virol. 2009; 83:1341–1349.
Article
Full Text Links
  • AARD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr