1. Ou RJ, Shaw EL, Glasgow BJ. Keratectasia after laser in situ kera-tomileusis (LASIK): evaluation of the calculated residual stromal bed thickness. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002; 134:771–3.
Article
2. Wang Z, Chen J, Yang B. Posterior corneal surface topographic changes after laser in situ keratomileusis are related to resicdual corneal bed thickness. Ophthalmology. 1999; 106:406–9. discussion 409-10.
3. Yau CW, Cheng HC. Microkeratome blades and corneal flap thick-ness in LASIK. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008; 39:471–5.
Article
4. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thick-ness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993; 115:592–6.
Article
5. Kim DH, Kim MS, Kim JH. Early corneal-thickness changes after penetrating keratoplasty. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1997; 38:1355–61.
6. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000; 44:367–408.
7. Jonas JB, Stroux A, Velten I. . Central corneal thickness corre-lated with glaucoma damage and rate of progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005; 46:1269–74.
Article
8. Li EY, Mohamed S, Leung CK. . Agreement among 3 methods to measure corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry, Orbscan II, and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:1842–7.
Article
9. Choi KS, Nam SM, Lee HK. . Comparison of central corneal thickness after the instillation of topical anesthetics: proparacaine versus oxybuprocaine. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2005; 46:757–62.
10. Kim HS, Kim JH, Kim HM, Song JS. Comparison of corneal thick-ness measured by specular, US pachymetry, and Orbscan in post-PKP eyes. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:245–50.
11. Menassa N, Kaufmann C, Goggin M. . Comparison and re-producibility of corneal thickness and curvature readings obtained by the Galilei and the Orbscan II analysis systems. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34:1742–47.
Article
12. Shim HS, Choi CY, Lee HG. . Utility of the anterior segment optical coherence tomography for measurements of central corneal thickness. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:1643–8.
Article
13. Jung YG, Song JS, Kim HM, Jung HR. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements with noncontact specular microscope and ultrasonic pachymeter. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 45:1060–5.
14. Kim HY, Budenz DL, Lee PS. . Comparison of central corneal thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography vs ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 145:228–32.
Article
15. Kim DW, Yi KY, Choi DG, Shin YJ. Corneal thickness measured by dual Scheimpflug, anterior segment optical coherence tomog-raphy, and ultrasound pachymetry. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2012; 53:1412–8.
Article
16. Thomas J, Wang J, Rollins AM, Sturm J. Comparison of corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, ultrasonic pachymetry, and a scanning slit method. J Refract Surg 2006; 22. 671–8.
Article
17. Ling T, Ho A, Holden BA. Method of evaluating ultrasonic pachometers. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986; 63:462–6.
Article
18. Copt RP, Thomas R, Mermoud A. Corneal thickness in ocular hy-pertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, and normal tension glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999; 117:14–6.
Article
19. Harper CL, Boulton ME, Bennett D. . Diurnal variations in hu-man corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996; 80:1068–72.
Article
20. Ventura AC, Wälti R, Böhnke M. Corneal thickness and endothe-lial density before and after cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001; 85:18–20.
Article
21. Savini G, Carbonelli M, Barboni P, Hoffer KJ. Repeatability of au-tomatic measurements performed by a dual Scheimpflug analyzer in unoperated and post-refractive surgery eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:302–9.
Article
22. Bovelle R, Kaufman SC, Thompson HW, Hamano H. Corneal thickness measurements with the Topcon SP-2000P specular mi-croscope and an ultrasound pachymeter. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117. 868–70.
Article
23. Módis L Jr, Langenbucher A, Seitz B. Corneal thickness measure-ments with contact and noncontact specular microscopic and ultra-sonic pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001; 132:517–21.
24. Jung YG, Song JS, Kim HM, Jung HR. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements with noncontact specular microscope and ultrasonic pachymeter. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 45:1060–5.
25. Yang YS, Koh JW. Utility of the noncontact specular microscopy for measurements of central corneal thickness. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2014; 55:59–65.
Article
26. Yeter V, Sönmez B, Beden U. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by Galilei Dual-Scheimpflug analyzer(R) and ultrasound pachymeter in myopic eyes. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2012; 43:128–34.
27. Ladi JS, Shah NA. Comparison of central corneal thickness meas-urements with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and ultra-sound pachymetry. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010; 58:385–8.
Article
28. Prakash G, Agarwal A, Jacob S. . Comparison of fourier-domain and time-domain optical coherence tomography for assessment of corneal thickness and intersession repeatability. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009; 148:282–90.e2.
Article
29. Feizi S, Jafarinasab MR, Karimian F. . Central and peripheral corneal thickness measurement in normal and keratoconic eyes us-ing three corneal pachymeters. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2014; 9:296–304.