Healthc Inform Res.  2010 Mar;16(1):46-51. 10.4258/hir.2010.16.1.46.

Non-linear Analysis of Single Electroencephalography (EEG) for Sleep-Related Healthcare Applications

Affiliations
  • 1Deptartment of Medical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sunkyoo@yuhs.ac
  • 2Brain Korea 21 for the College of Medical Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Human Identification Research Center, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
Soft-computing techniques are commonly used to detect medical phenomena and to help with clinical diagnoses and treatment. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the single electroencephalography (EEG) signal with the chaotic methods in order to identify the sleep stages. METHODS: Data acquisition (polysomnography) was performed on four healthy young adults (all males with a mean age of 27.5 years). The evaluated algorithm was designed with a correlation dimension and Lyapunov's exponent using a single EEG signal that detects differences in chaotic characteristics. RESULTS: The change of the correlation dimension and the largest Lyapunov exponent over the whole night sleep EEG was performed. The results show that the correlation dimension and largest Lyapunov exponent decreased from light sleep to deep sleep and they increased during the rapid eye movement stage. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that chaotic analysis may be a useful adjunct to linear (spectral) analysis for identifying sleep stages. The single EEG based nonlinear analysis is suitable for u-healthcare applications for monitoring sleep.

Keyword

Regression Analysis; Electroencephalography; Sleep Stage; Lyapunov Exponent; u-Healthcare

MeSH Terms

Delivery of Health Care
Electroencephalography
Humans
Light
Male
Regression Analysis
Sleep Stages
Sleep, REM
Young Adult

Figure

  • Figure 1 The result of correlation dimension (D2) with respect to the different sleep stages. Light sleep 1: stage 1, Light sleep 2: stage 2, Deep sleep 1: stage 3, Deep sleep 2: stage 4, REM: rapid eye movement.

  • Figure 2 The result of Lyapunov exponent (L1) with respect to the different sleep stages. Light sleep 1: stage 1, Light sleep 2: stage 2, Deep sleep 1: stage 3, Deep sleep 2: stage 4, REM: rapid eye movement.

  • Figure 3 Mean and standard deviation of D2 for wakefulness stage, sleep stage 1-4, and rapid eye movement (REM) stage for each recording sets. WA: wake, L1: light sleep1, L2: light sleep2, D1: deep sleep1, D2: deep sleep2, REM: rapid eye movement

  • Figure 4 Mean and standard deviation of L1 for wakefulness stage, sleep stage 1-4, and rapid eye movement (REM) stage for each recording sets. WA: Wake, L1: light sleep1, L2: light sleep2, D1: deep sleep1, D2: deep sleep2, REM: rapid eye movement


Reference

1. Park HA, Cho IS. Strategic approach for standardization on ubiqitous healthcare system. J Korean Soc Med Inform. 2007. 13:237–248.
Article
2. National Center on Sleep Disorders Research. NIH curriculum supplement series: grades 9-12 [Internet]. Sleep, sleep disorders and biological rhythms. 2003. cited 2009 Sep 15. Colorado Springs: Biological Sciences Curriculum Study;Available from: http://science.education.nih.gov/supplements/nih3/sleep/default.htm.
3. National Police Agency [Internet]. c2007. cited 2009 Sep 15. Seoul: National Police Agency;Available from: http://www.police.go.kr/infodata/pds_07_totalpds_01_01.jsp.
4. Rechtschaffen A, Kale A. A manual of standardized terminology: techniques, and scoring system for sleep stages of human subjects. 1968. Los Angeles (CA): UCLA Brain Information Service/Brain Research Institute.
5. Stam CJ. Nonlinear dynamical analysis of EEG and MEG: review of an emerging field. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005. 116:2266–2301.
Article
6. Roschke J, Aldenhoff JB. A nonlinear approach to brain function: deterministic chaos and sleep EEG. Sleep. 1992. 15:95–101.
Article
7. Babloyantz A, Salazar JM, Nicolis C. Evidence of chaotic dynamics of brain activity during the sleep cycle. Phys Lett A. 1985. 111:152–156.
Article
8. Lutzenberger W, Preissl H, Pulvermuller F. Fractal dimension of electroencephalographic time series and underlying brain processes. Biol Cybern. 1995. 73:477–482.
Article
9. Molle M, Marshall L, Lutzenberger W, Pietrowsky R, Fehm HL, Born J. Enhanced dynamic complexity in the human EEG during creative thinking. Neurosci Lett. 1996. 208:61–64.
Article
10. Kwon HK, Cho JS, Lee EJ. EEG Analysis of the left and right brain activities from cartoon learning versus text learning. J Korean Soc Med Inform. 2008. 14:239–244.
Article
11. Fraser AM, Swinney HL. Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. Phys Rev A. 1986. 33:1134–1140.
Article
12. Kennel MB, Brown R, Abarbanel HD. Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. Phys Rev A. 1992. 45:3403–3411.
Article
13. Grassberger P, Procaccia I. Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors. Physica D. 1983. 9:189–208.
Article
14. Rosenstein MT, Collins JJ, De Luca CJ. A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Physica D. 1992. 65:117–134.
Article
Full Text Links
  • HIR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr