Korean J Urol.  2015 Jan;56(1):41-47. 10.4111/kju.2015.56.1.41.

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma and lymphovascular invasion after radical nephroureterectomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hanwk@yuhs.ac
  • 2Department of Urology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records and clinicopatholgic outcomes of patients (n=552) treated with RNU between 1986 and 2013. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those for whom LVI status was not recorded were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups according to LVI (n=86) or no LVI (n=256).
RESULTS
The study included 344 patients (240 men and 104 women) with a median of 53.9 months of follow-up (range, 1-297 months) after RNU. Tumors were organ confined (T2/N0) in 211 (61.3%) and tumor grade high in 291 (84.6%). AC was administered in 64 patients (18.6%). A total of 280 patients (81.4%) were treated with surgery alone. Patients with LVI tended to be older (p=0.049), have a higher pT stage (pT3/T4, p<0.001), be pN+ (p<0.001), have a high tumor grade (p<0.001), and experience recurrence (p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, LVI was an independent prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival and overall survival (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that in the subgroup of patients with LVI, AC was a significant prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.51; p=0.027 and hazard ratio, 0.50; p=0.025, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
AC does not seem to reduce mortality in patients with advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma after RNU. In the subgroup of patients with LVI, AC had a positive impact on cancer-specific survival and overall survival. LVI would be helpful for selecting patients who are appropriate for AC.

Keyword

Adjuvant chemotherapy; Kidney pelvis; Transitional cell carcinoma; Ureter; Urinary tract

MeSH Terms

Aged
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy/*mortality/surgery
*Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy/*mortality/surgery
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Neoplasm Staging
Nephrectomy
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Ureter/pathology
Ureteral Neoplasms/drug therapy/*mortality/surgery
Urinary Tract/pathology

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Impact of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in cancer-specific (A) and overall survivals (B) in patients with upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma.


Reference

1. Raman JD, Messer J, Sielatycki JA, Hollenbeak CS. Incidence and survival of patients with carcinoma of the ureter and renal pelvis in the USA, 1973-2005. BJU Int. 2011; 107:1059–1064.
2. Margulis V, Shariat SF, Matin SF, Kamat AM, Zigeuner R, Kikuchi E, et al. Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: a series from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. Cancer. 2009; 115:1224–1233.
3. Kwak C, Lee SE, Jeong IG, Ku JH. Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. Urology. 2006; 68:53–57.
4. Kim TS, Oh JH, Rhew HY. The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma. J Cancer. 2013; 4:686–690.
5. Hellenthal NJ, Shariat SF, Margulis V, Karakiewicz PI, Roscigno M, Bolenz C, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for high risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: results from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. J Urol. 2009; 182:900–906.
6. Lucca I, Kassouf W, Kapoor A, Fairey A, Rendon RA, Izawa JI, et al. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy for lymph nodepositive upper tract urothelial carcinoma following radical nephroureterectomy: a retrospective study. BJU Int. 2014; 05. 13. [Epub]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.12801.
7. Leow JJ, Martin-Doyle W, Fay AP, Choueiri TK, Chang SL, Bellmunt J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2014; 66:529–541.
8. Kikuchi E, Horiguchi Y, Nakashima J, Hatakeyama N, Matsumoto M, Nishiyama T, et al. Lymphovascular invasion independently predicts increased disease specific survival in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. J Urol. 2005; 174:2120–2123.
9. Kim DS, Lee YH, Cho KS, Cho NH, Chung BH, Hong SJ. Lymphovascular invasion and pT stage are prognostic factors in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy for localized upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. Urology. 2010; 75:328–332.
10. Novara G, Matsumoto K, Kassouf W, Walton TJ, Fritsche HM, Bastian PJ, et al. Prognostic role of lymphovascular invasion in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: an international validation study. Eur Urol. 2010; 57:1064–1071.
11. Hurel S, Roupret M, Ouzzane A, Rozet F, Xylinas E, Zerbib M, et al. Impact of lymphovascular invasion on oncological outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy. BJU Int. 2013; 111:1199–1207.
12. Hong B, Park S, Hong JH, Kim CS, Ro JY, Ahn H. Prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in transitional cell carcinoma of upper urinary tract. Urology. 2005; 65:692–696.
13. Kuroda K, Asakuma J, Horiguchi A, Tasaki S, Yoshii H, Sato A, et al. Prognostic factors for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after nephroureterectomy. Urol Int. 2012; 88:225–231.
14. Lee SE, Hong SK, Han BK, Yu JH, Han JH, Jeong SJ, et al. Prognostic significance of tumor necrosis in primary transitional cell carcinoma of upper urinary tract. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007; 37:49–55.
15. Roupret M, Babjuk M, Comperat E, Zigeuner R, Sylvester R, Burger M, et al. European guidelines on upper tract urothelial carcinomas: 2013 update. Eur Urol. 2013; 63:1059–1071.
16. Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VR, Mostofi FK. The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Bladder Consensus Conference Committee. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998; 22:1435–1448.
17. Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17:1471–1474.
18. Hasui Y, Nishi S, Kitada S, Osada Y, Asada Y. The prognostic significance of vascular invasion in upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. J Urol. 1992; 148:1783–1785.
19. Bolenz C, Shariat SF, Fernandez MI, Margulis V, Lotan Y, Karakiewicz P, et al. Risk stratification of patients with nodal involvement in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: value of lymphnode density. BJU Int. 2009; 103:302–306.
Full Text Links
  • KJU
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr