Ultrasonography.  2014 Jan;33(1):26-33.

Usefulness of acoustic radiation force impulse elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid pancreatic lesions

• Park MK
• Jo J
• Kwon H
• Cho JH
• Oh JY
• Noh MH
• Nam KJ

Abstract

PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to evaluate the tissue stiffness of solid pancreatic lesions by using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography to differentiate benign from malignant pancreatic lesions.
METHODS
ARFI elastography was performed in 26 patients who had 27 focal solid pancreatic lesions, including 8 benign lesions (mass-forming pancreatitis, 5; autoimmune pancreatitis, 3) and 19 malignant lesions (pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 16; metastasis from colorectal cancer, 2; malignant neuroendocrine tumor, 1). On the elastographic images of virtual touch tissue imaging (VTI), the echogenicity of the mass was categorized on a 5-grade scale. On the elastographic image of virtual touch tissue quantification (VTQ), the shear wave velocities (SWVs) of the lesion and surrounding parenchyma were measured.
RESULTS
On the VTI images, the mean echogenicity score of the malignant lesions (3.7+/-1.0) was higher than that of the benign lesions (3.1+/-0.4; P=0.023). On the VTQ images, there were no statistical differences in the mean SWV between the benign (2.4+/-1.1 m/sec) and malignant (3.3+/-1.0 m/sec) lesions (P=0.101). However, the mean SWV difference values between the lesion and background parenchyma of the malignant lesions (1.5+/-0.8 m/sec) were higher than those of the benign lesions (0.4+/-0.3 m/sec; P=0.011).
CONCLUSION
ARFI elastography can determine the relative stiffness between a lesion and the background pancreatic parenchyma using VTI and VTQ, which is helpful in the differentiation between benign and malignant solid pancreatic lesions.

Keyword

Ultrasonography; Elasticity imaging Techniques; Pancreas; Pancreatic neoplasms

MeSH Terms

Acoustics*
Adenocarcinoma
Colorectal Neoplasms
Diagnosis, Differential*
Elasticity Imaging Techniques*
Humans
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Pancreas
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Pancreatitis
Ultrasonography

Reference

Reference

1. D'Onofrio M, Zamboni G, Tognolini A, Malago R, Faccioli N, Frulloni L, et al. Mass-forming pancreatitis: value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. World J Gastroenterol. 2006; 12:4181–4184.

2. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrasonic Imaging. 1991; 13:111–134.

3. Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J, Spratt SR, Zuurbier RA, Magnant CM, et al. Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology. 1997; 202:79–86.

4. Lorenz A, Sommerfeld HJ, Garcia-Schurmann M, Philippou S, Senge T, Ermert H. A new system for the acquisition of ultrasonic multicompression strain images of the human prostate in vivo. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1999; 46:1147–1154.

5. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006; 239:341–350.

6. Cochlin DL, Ganatra RH, Griffiths DF. Elastography in the detection of prostatic cancer. Clin Radiol. 2002; 57:1014–1020.

7. Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, Tanaka S, Ito J, Mai JJ, et al. Thyroid gland tumor diagnosis at US elastography. Radiology. 2005; 237:202–211.

8. Goddi A, Bonardi M, Alessi S. Breast elastography: a literature review. J Ultrasound. 2012; 15:192–198.

9. Dighe M, Luo S, Cuevas C, Kim Y. Efficacy of thyroid ultrasound elastography in differential diagnosis of small thyroid nodules. Eur J Radiol. 2013; 82:e274–e280.

10. Janssen J, Schlörer E, Greiner L. EUS elastography of the pancreas: feasibility and pattern description of the normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, and focal pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 65:971–978.

11. Hirche TO, Ignee A, Barreiros AP, Schreiber-Dietrich D, Jungblut S, Ott M, et al. Indications and limitations of endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of focal pancreatic lesions. Endoscopy. 2008; 40:910–917.

12. Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu F, Gheonea DI, Gorunescu M, Ciurea T, et al. Neural network analysis of dynamic sequences of EUS elastography used for the differential diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 68:1086–1094.

13. Iglesias-Garcia J, Larino-Noia J, Abdulkader I, Forteza J, Dominguez-Munoz JE. EUS elastography for the characterization of solid pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70:1101–1108.

14. Iglesias-Garcia J, Larino-Noia J, Abdulkader I, Forteza J, Dominguez-Munoz JE. Quantitative endoscopic ultrasound elastography: an accurate method for the differentiation of solid pancreatic masses. Gastroenterology. 2010; 139:1172–1180.

15. Uchida H, Hirooka Y, Itoh A, Kawashima H, Hara K, Nonogaki K, et al. Feasibility of tissue elastography using transcutaneous ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases. Pancreas. 2009; 38:17–22.

16. Kawada N, Tanaka S, Uehara H, Takakura R, Katayama K, Fukuda J, et al. Feasibility of second-generation transabdominal ultrasound- elastography to evaluate solid pancreatic tumors: preliminary report of 36 cases. Pancreas. 2012; 41:978–980.

17. Korc M. Pancreatic cancer associated stroma production. Am J Surg. 2007; 194(4 Suppl):s84–s86.

18. Zhai L, Palmeri ML, Bouchard RR, Nightingale RW, Nightingale KR. An integrated indenter-ARFI imaging system for tissue stiffness quantification. Ultrason Imaging. 2008; 30:95–111.

19. Palmeri ML, Wang MH, Dahl JJ, Frinkley KD, Nightingale KR. Quantifying hepatic shear modulus in vivo using acoustic radiation force. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008; 34:546–558.

20. Lupsor M, Badea R, Horia S, Sparchez Z, Branda H, Serban A, et al. Performance of a new elastographic method (ARFI technology) compared to unidimensional transient elastography in the noninvasive assessment of chronic hepatitis C: preliminary results. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2009; 18:303–310.

21. Itokawa F, Itoi T, Sofuni A, Kurihara T, Tsuchiya T, Ishii K, et al. EUS elastography combined with the strain ratio of tissue elasticity for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. J Gastroenterol. 2011; 46:843–853.

22. Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu F, Janssen J, Hocke M, Larsen M, et al. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound elastography used for differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses: a multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2011; 43:596–603.

23. Nightingale K, Soo MS, Nightingale R, Trahey G. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: in vivo demonstration of clinical feasibility. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002; 28:227–235.

24. Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, Nightingale RW, Trahey GE. On the feasibility of remote palpation using acoustic radiation force. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001; 110:625–634.

25. Friedrich-Rust M, Wunder K, Kriener S, Sotoudeh F, Richter S, Bojunga J. Liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis: non invasive assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging versus transient elastography. Radiology. 2009; 252:595–604.

26. Mateen MA, Muheet KA, Mohan RJ, Rao PN, Majaz HM, Rao GV, et al. Evaluation of ultrasound based acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) and eSie touch sonoelastography for diagnosis of inflammatory pancreatic diseases. JOP. 2012; 13:36–44.

27. Gallotti A, D'Onofrio M, Pozzi Mucelli R. Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) technique in ultrasound with Virtual Touch tissue quantification of the upper abdomen. Radiol Med. 2010; 115:889–897.

28. D'Onofrio M, Crosara S, De Robertis R, Canestrini S, Demozzi E, Pozzi Mucelli R. Elastography of the pancreas. Eur J Radiol. 2013 May 28 [Epub]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.020.

29. Yashima Y, Sasahira N, Isayama H, Kogure H, Ikeda H, Hirano K, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for noninvasive assessment of chronic pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol. 2012; 47:427–432.