Korean J Fertil Steril.  2003 Jun;30(2):165-170.

Comparative Analysis of Sperm Motility Using Cell Soft System-3000 and Sperm Quality Analyzer-V

Affiliations
  • 1Laboratory of Reproductive Biology and Infertility, Samsung Cheil Hospital & Women's Healthcare Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. arkangel@daum.net
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Cheil Hospital & Women's Healthcare Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Urology, Samsung Cheil Hospital & Women's Healthcare Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jtandro@samsung.co.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the results of CASA systems and to compare its results.
METHODS
Fifty semen sampales were analysed. Concentration, motility and forward progression were evaluated simultaneously on the same semen samples using Cell Soft System-3000 (CS system) and Sperm Quality Analyzer-V (SQA system).
RESULTS
Mean semen volume was 2.8+/-.2 ml. Mean value of sperm concentration, motility, forward progression using CS system were 83.4+/-5.7x106/ml, 52.3+/-6.4% and 48.6+/-3.4%, respectively. And mean value of sperm concentration, motility, forward progression using SQA system were 78.2+/-2.9x106/ml, 57.0+/-4.0% and 50.6+/-1.9%, respectively. There were no statistical significancy of sperm concentration, motility, forward progression between the two devices.
CONCLUSION
SQA system variables well correlated with the CS system. As a screening test for semen quality, CS system and SQA system is considered as useful in the management of male infertility.

Keyword

Semen analysis; Motility; Forward progression; CASA; SQA

MeSH Terms

Infertility, Male
Male
Mass Screening
Semen
Semen Analysis
Sperm Motility*
Spermatozoa*
Full Text Links
  • KJFS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr