J Korean Acad Periodontol.  2009 Mar;39(1):53-58. 10.5051/jkape.2009.39.1.53.

Comparison of root resection and tunnel preparation in the clinical outcome of furcation-involved mandibular molars

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Korea. leejm@knu.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE: The resective treatment in mandibular Degree III furcation areas includes root resection and tunnel preparation. The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate which treatment procedure(root resection vs tunnel preparation) has more favorable prognosis in mandibular Degree III furcation involvement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The subjects of this study were patients who were treated their mandibular posteriors with either root resection(22 teeth on 22 patients) or tunnel preparation(24 teeth on 22 patients) and have participated in periodic recall check program for at least 2 years. Failure rate, plaque index, bleeding on probing and probing pocket depth were measured and the results were compared and statistically analysed.
RESULTS
Failure rates of root resection and tunnel praparation were 13.6% and 16.7%, respectively, and showed no significant difference between two procedures. No significant differences were observed between two procedures with respect to plaque index, bleeding on probing and probing pocket depth.
CONCLUSION
root resection and tunnel preparation are both effective procedures to treat mandibular posterior furcation involvement, if adequate treatment of choice is made and patient's cooperation is accompanied. However, tunnel preparation is more preservative procedure in mandibular posterior furcation involvement since root canal treatment and prosthetic restoration are needed additionally, in case of root resection.

Keyword

root resection; tunnel preparation; mandibular Degree III furcation areas

MeSH Terms

Dental Pulp Cavity
Hemorrhage
Humans
Molar
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Tooth

Figure

  • Figure 1 Tunneling of #36: preoperative radiograph and photo.

  • Figure 2 Tunneling of #36: postoperative radiograph and photo (25 months).

  • Figure 3 Root resection of #46: preoperative radiograph and photo.

  • Figure 4 Root resection of #46: postoperative radiograph and photo (5 years).


Reference

1. Hamp SE, Nyman S, Lindhe J. Periodontal treatment of multirooted teeth. Results after 5 years. J Clin Periodontol. 1975. 2:126–135.
Article
2. Loos B, Nylund K, Claffey N, Egelberg J. Clinical effects of root debridement in molar and non-molar teeth. A 2-year follow-up. J Clin Periodontol. 1989. 16:498–504.
Article
3. Wang HL, Burgett FG, Shyr Y, Ramfjord S. The influence of molar furcation involvement and mobility on future clinical periodontal attachment loss. Journal of periodontology. 1994. 65:25–29.
Article
4. Kalkwarf KL, Khal WB, Patil KD. Evaluation of furcation region response to periodontal therapy. Journal of periodontology. 1988. 59:794–804.
Article
5. Dannewitz B, Krieger JK, Hüsing J, Eickholz P. Loss of molars in periodontally treated patients: a retrospective analysis five years or more after active periodontal treatment. J Clin Periodontol. 2006. 33:53–61.
Article
6. Vandersall DC, Detamore RJ. The mandibular molar class III furcation invasion: a review of treatment options and a case report of tunneling. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002. 133:55–60.
7. Garrett S, Gantes B, Zimmerman G, Egelberg J. Treatment of mandibular class III periodontal furcation defects. Coronally positioned flaps with and without expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes. J Periodontol. 1994. 65:592–597.
Article
8. Smulker H, Tagger M. Vital root amputation. A clinical and histolotgical study. J Periodontol. 1976. 47:324–330.
9. Buhler H. Survival rates of hemisected teeth: an attempt to compare them with survival rates of alloplastic implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1994. 14:536–543.
10. Little LA, Beck FM, Bagci B, Horton JE. Lack of furcal bone loss following the tunneling procedure. J Clin Periodontol. 1995. 22:637–641.
Article
11. Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condtion. Acta Odontol Scand. 1964. 22:121–135.
Article
12. Langer B, Stein SD, Wagenberg B. An evaluation of root resections. A ten-years study. J Periodontol. 1981. 52:719–722.
13. Buhler H. Evaluation of root-resected teeth. Results after 10 years. J Periodontol. 1988. 59:805–810.
14. Carnevale G, Gianfranco D, Tonelli M, Martin C, Massimo F. A retro-spective analysis of the periodotal prosthetic treatment of molars with interradicular lesions. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1991. 11:189–205.
15. Hellden LB, Elliot A, Steffensen B, Steffensen JE. The prognosis of tunnel preparations in treatment of class III furcations. A follow-up study. J Periodontol. 1989. 60:182–187.
Article
16. Mühlemann HR, Son S. Gingival sulcus bleeding-a leading symptom in initial gingivitis. Helv Odontol Acta. 1971. 15:107–113.
17. Ravald N, Hamp SE. Prediction of root surface caries in patients treated for advanced periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol. 1981. 8:400–414.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKAPE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr