J Korean Med Sci.  2013 May;28(5):763-768. 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.5.763.

Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Internet Addiction Test among College Students

• Lee K
• Lee HK
• Gyeong H
• Yu B
• Song YM
• Kim D

• KMID: 1777566
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2013.28.5.763

Abstract

We developed a Korean translation of the Internet Addiction Test (KIAT), widely used self-report for internet addiction and tested its reliability and validity in a sample of college students. Two hundred seventy-nine college students at a national university completed the KIAT. Internal consistency and two week test-retest reliability were calculated from the data, and principal component factor analysis was conducted. Participants also completed the Internet Addiction Diagnostic Questionnaire (IADQ), the Korea Internet addiction scale (K-scale), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for the criterion validity. Cronbach's alpha of the whole scale was 0.91, and test-retest reliability was also good (r = 0.73). The IADQ, the K-scale, and depressive symptoms were significantly correlated with the KIAT scores, demonstrating concurrent and convergent validity. The factor analysis extracted four factors (Excessive use, Dependence, Withdrawal, and Avoidance of reality) that accounted for 59% of total variance. The KIAT has outstanding internal consistency and high test-retest reliability. Also, the factor structure and validity data show that the KIAT is comparable to the original version. Thus, the KIAT is a psychometrically sound tool for assessing internet addiction in the Korean-speaking population.

Keyword

Internet Addiction Test; Reliability, Validity; Internet Addiction; Factor Analysis

MeSH Terms

Asian Continental Ancestry Group
Behavior, Addictive/*diagnosis
Depression/diagnosis
Female
Humans
Male
*Program Evaluation
Questionnaires
Republic of Korea
Students/psychology
*Translating
Universities
Young Adult

Reference

1. Young KS. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav. 1998. 1:237–244.

2. Griffiths M. Behavioural addiction: an issue for everybody? Empl Couns Today. 1996. 8:19–25.

3. Holden C. Psychiatry: behavioral addictions debut in proposed DSM-V. Science. 2010. 327:935.

4. Korea Internet & Security Agency. 2009 survey on the internet usage of foreign residents in Korea. 2010. Seoul: KISA.

5. Koo C, Wati Y, Lee CC, Oh HY. Internet-addicted kids and South Korean government efforts: boot-camp case. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011. 14:391–394.

6. Brenner V. Psychology of computer use: XLVII. parameters of internet use, abuse and addiction: the first 90 days of the Internet Usage Survey. Psychol Rep. 1997. 80:879–882.

7. Greenfield DN. Psychological characteristics of compulsive internet use: a preliminary analysis. Cyberpsychol Behav. 1999. 2:403–412.

8. Shapira NA, Goldsmith TD, Keck PE Jr, Khosla UM, McElroy SL. Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic internet use. J Affect Disord. 2000. 57:267–272.

9. Young K. Internet addiction: diagnosis and treatment considerations. J Contemp Psychother. 2009. 39:241–246.

10. Young KS. Caught in the net: how to recognize the signs of internet addiction and a winning strategy for recovery. 1998. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

11. Caplan SE. Problematic internet use and psychosocial well-being: development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument. Comp Hum Behav. 2002. 18:553–575.

12. Koh YS. Development and application of K-Scale as diagnostic scale for Korean internet addiction. 2007. Seoul: Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion.

13. Widyanto L, McMurran M. The psychometric properties of the internet addiction test. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004. 7:443–450.

14. Ngai SY. Exploring the validity of the internet addiction test for students in grades 5-9 in Hong Kong. Int J Adolesc Youth. 2007. 13:221–237.

15. Khazaal Y, Billieux J, Thorens G, Khan R, Louati Y, Scarlatti E, Theintz F, Lederrey J, Van Der Linden M, Zullino D. French validation of the internet addiction test. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008. 11:703–706.

16. Ferraro G, Caci B, D'Amico A, Di Blasi M. Internet addiction disorder: an Italian Study. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007. 10:170–175.

17. Conti MA, Jardim AP, Hearst N, Cordás TA, Tavares H, de Abreu CN. Evaluation of semantic equivalence and internal consistency of a Portuguese version of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT). Rev Psiq Clin. 2012. 39:106–110.

18. Korkeila J, Kaarlas S, Jääskeläinen M, Vahlberg T, Taiminen T. Attached to the web: harmful use of the internet and its correlates. Eur Psychiatry. 2010. 25:236–241.

19. Barke A, Nyenhuis N, Kröner-Herwig B. The German version of the internet addiction test: a validation study. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012. 15:534–542.

20. Chong Guan N, Isa SM, Hashim AH, Pillai SK, Harbajan Singh MK. Validity of the Malay version of the internet addiction test: a study on a group of medical students in Malaysia. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2012. doi: 10.1177/1010539512447808.

21. Booklet of screening and assessing adolescents for mental health. 2007. Seoul: Seoul Child & Adolescent Mental Health Center.

22. Yun JH. Internet addiction and its relation to depression, impulsiveness, sensation seeking tendency, and social relationship: psychology. 1999. Seoul: Korea University.

23. Yang CK, Choe BM, Baity M, Lee JH, Cho JS. SCL-90-R and 16PF profiles of senior high school students with excessive internet use. Can J Psychiatry. 2005. 50:407–414.

24. Kang MC, Oh IS. Development of Korean internet addiction scales. Korean J Youth Counsel. 2001. 9:114–135.

25. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000. 25:3186–3191.

26. Gyeong H, Lee HK, Lee K. Factor analysis of the Young's internet addiction test: in Korean College Students Group. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2012. 51:45–51.

27. Kim D. The follow up study of internet addiction proneness scale. 2008. Seoul: Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion.

28. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001. 16:606–613.

29. Park SJ, Choi HR, Choi JH, Kim KW, Hong JP. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Anxiety Mood. 2010. 6:119–124.

30. Kim K, Ryu E, Chon MY, Yeun EJ, Choi SY, Seo JS, Nam BW. Internet addiction in Korean adolescents and its relation to depression and suicidal ideation: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006. 43:185–192.

31. Manago AM, Taylor T, Greenfield PM. Me and my 400 friends: the anatomy of college students' Facebook networks, their communication patterns, and well-being. Dev Psychol. 2012. 48:369–380.

32. Jelenchick LA, Becker T, Moreno MA. Assessing the psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) in US college students. Psychiatry Res. 2012. 196:296–301.

33. Widyanto L, Griffiths MD, Brunsden V. A psychometric comparison of the Internet Addiction Test, the Internet-Related Problem Scale, and self-diagnosis. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011. 14:141–149.

34. Chang MK, Man Law SP. Factor structure for Young's Internet Addiction Test: a confirmatory study. Comput Hum Behav. 2008. 24:2597–2619.

35. Ha JH, Kim SY, Bae SC, Bae S, Kim H, Sim M, Lyoo IK, Cho SC. Depression and Internet addiction in adolescents. Psychopathology. 2007. 40:424–430.

36. Lai CM. Psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test in Hong Kong Chinese adolescents. 2012. Cape Town: International Congress of Psychology.

37. Yu HS. Third-person effect and support for regulations toward internet games. J Commun Sci. 2011. 11:333–364.