Anesth Pain Med.  2011 Jul;6(3):231-235.

Cost analysis of sevoflurane anesthesia compared with propofol and remifentanil infusion

• Lee SH
• Shin WJ
• Jeon WJ

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Cost control in general anesthesia is no longer an option; it is a necessity. New anesthetics have entered the market, but economic differences in comparison to standard anesthetic regimens are not exactly known. The purpose of this study was to compare the cost of a sevoflurane-based strategy with a propofol-based general anesthetic technique.
METHODS
Eighty patients undergoing elective surgery were randomly divided into two groups, with 40 patients each. The propofol group received propofol with remifentanil infusion, and the sevoflurane group received sevoflurane with N2O 50%, O2 50% for anesthesia. Sevoflurane consumption was measured by weighing the vaporizer using a precision weighing machine. We recorded the use of all drugs for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia, and postoperative pain control in the postoperative anesthesia care unit.
RESULTS
The recovery characteristics were not significantly different in the two groups. Total (intra and postoperative) cost were significantly higher in the propofol group than in the sevoflurane group.
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that in today's climate of cost savings, a comprehensive pharmacoeconomic approach is needed.

Keyword

General anesthesia; Propofol; Sevoflurane

MeSH Terms

Anesthesia
Anesthesia, General
Anesthetics
Climate
Cost Control
Cost Savings
Costs and Cost Analysis
Humans
Methyl Ethers
Nebulizers and Vaporizers
Pain, Postoperative
Piperidines
Propofol
Anesthetics
Methyl Ethers
Piperidines
Propofol