Clin Orthop Surg.  2010 Sep;2(3):130-139. 10.4055/cios.2010.2.3.130.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients with Generalized Joint Laxity

Affiliations
  • 1Yonsei University Arthroscopy & Joint Research Institute and Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea. othrohwan@gmail.com
  • 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lisie Hospital, Kochi, India.

Abstract

Generalized joint laxity is a genetically determined component of overall joint flexibility. The incidence of joint laxity in the overall population is approximately 5% to 20%, and its prevalence is higher in females. Recently it was noticed that individuals with generalized joint laxity are not only prone to anterior cruciate ligament injuries but also have inferior results after a reconstruction. Therefore, an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with generalized laxity should be undertaken with caution due to the higher expected failure rate from the complexity of problems associated with this condition. It is also necessary to identify the risk factors for the injury as well as for the post operative outcome in this population. A criterion that includes all the associated components is necessary for the proper screening of individuals for generalized joint laxity. Graft selection for an anterior cruciate reconstruction in patients with ligament laxity is a challenge. According to the senior author, a hamstring autograft is an inferior choice and a double bundle reconstruction with a quadriceps tendon-bone autograft yields better results than a single bundle bone-patella tendon-bone autograft. Future studies comparing the different grafts available might be needed to determine the preferred graft for this subset of patients. Improved results after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can be achieved by proper planning and careful attention to each step beginning from the clinical examination to the postoperative rehabilitation.

Keyword

Anterior cruciate ligament; Reconstruction; Joint instability; Generalized

MeSH Terms

Anterior Cruciate Ligament/*injuries/*surgery
Bone Transplantation/methods
Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft/methods
Humans
Joint Instability/*complications/physiopathology
Range of Motion, Articular
*Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Risk Factors
Tendons/transplantation
Treatment Outcome

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Algorithm for managing an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency in patients with generalized ligament laxity.


Reference

1. Stewart DR, Burden SB. Does generalised ligamentous laxity increase seasonal incidence of injuries in male first division club rugby players? Br J Sports Med. 2004. 38(4):457–460.
Article
2. Acasuso Diaz M, Collantes Estevez E, Sanchez Guijo P. Joint hyperlaxity and musculoligamentous lesions: study of a population of homogeneous age, sex and physical exertion. Br J Rheumatol. 1993. 32(2):120–122.
3. Decoster LC, Bernier JN, Lindsay RH, Vailas JC. Generalized joint hypermobility and its relationship to injury patterns among NCAA lacrosse players. J Athl Train. 1999. 34(2):99–105.
4. Nicholas JA. Injuries to knee ligaments: relationship to looseness and tightness in football players. JAMA. 1970. 212(13):2236–2239.
Article
5. Kim SJ, Chang JH, Kim TW, Jo SB, Oh KS. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with use of a single or double-bundle technique in patients with generalized ligamentous laxity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009. 91(2):257–262.
Article
6. Kim SJ, Kim TE, Lee DH, Oh KS. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients who have excessive joint laxity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008. 90(4):735–741.
Article
7. Myer GD, Ford KR, Paterno MV, Nick TG, Hewett TE. The effects of generalized joint laxity on risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury in young female athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2008. 36(6):1073–1080.
Article
8. Ramesh R, Von Arx O, Azzopardi T, Schranz PJ. The risk of anterior cruciate ligament rupture with generalised joint laxity. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005. 87(6):800–803.
Article
9. Griffin LY, Albohm MJ, Arendt EA, et al. Understanding and preventing noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a review of the Hunt Valley II meeting, January 2005. Am J Sports Med. 2006. 34(9):1512–1532.
Article
10. Kramer LC, Denegar CR, Buckley WE, Hertel J. Factors associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury: history in female athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2007. 47(4):446–454.
11. Soderman K, Alfredson H, Pietila T, Werner S. Risk factors for leg injuries in female soccer players: a prospective investigation during one out-door season. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001. 9(5):313–321.
Article
12. Allen MK, Glasoe WM. Metrecom measurement of navicular drop in subjects with anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Athl Train. 2000. 35(4):403–406.
13. Loudon JK, Jenkins W, Loudon KL. The relationship between static posture and ACL injury in female athletes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996. 24(2):91–97.
Article
14. Smith J, Szczerba JE, Arnold BL, Perrin DH, Martin DE. Role of hyperpronation as a possible risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament injuries. J Athl Train. 1997. 32(1):25–28.
15. Woodford-Rogers B, Cyphert L, Denegar CR. Risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury in high school and college athletes. J Athl Train. 1994. 29(4):343–346.
16. Hardin JA, Voight ML, Blackburn TA, Canner GC, Soffer SR. The effects of "decelerated" rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on a hyperelastic female adolescent: a case study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997. 26(1):29–34.
Article
17. Alford JW, Bach BR Jr. Scott WN, editor. Instrumented ligamentous laxity testing. Surgery of the knee. 2006. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier;584–614.
18. Pearsall AW, Kovaleski JE, Heitman RJ, Gurchiek LR, Hollis JM. The relationships between instrumented measurements of ankle and knee ligamentous laxity and generalized joint laxity. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2006. 46(1):104–110.
19. Carter C, Wilkinson J. Persistent joint laxity and congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1964. 46(1):40–45.
20. Beighton P, Horan F. Orthopaedic aspects of the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1969. 51(3):444–453.
21. Beighton P, Solomon L, Soskolne CL. Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis. 1973. 32(5):413–418.
22. Rotes-Querol J. Articular laxity considered as factor of changes of the locomotor apparatus. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1957. 24(7-8):535–539.
23. Boyle KL, Witt P, Riegger-Krugh C. Intrarater and interrater reliability of the Beighton and Horan Joint Mobility Index. J Athl Train. 2003. 38(4):281–285.
24. Bulbena A, Duro JC, Porta M, Faus S, Vallescar R, Martin-Santos R. Clinical assessment of hypermobility of joints: assembling criteria. J Rheumatol. 1992. 19(1):115–122.
25. Juul-Kristensen B, Rogind H, Jensen DV, Remvig L. Interexaminer reproducibility of tests and criteria for generalized joint hypermobility and benign joint hypermobility syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007. 46(12):1835–1841.
26. Mikkelsson M, Salminen JJ, Kautiainen H. Joint hypermobility is not a contributing factor to musculoskeletal pain in pre-adolescents. J Rheumatol. 1996. 23(11):1963–1967.
27. El-Garf AK, Mahmoud GA, Mahgoub EH. Hypermobility among Egyptian children: prevalence and features. J Rheumatol. 1998. 25(5):1003–1005.
28. Gedalia A, Press J. Articular symptoms in hypermobile schoolchildren: a prospective study. J Pediatr. 1991. 119(6):944–946.
Article
29. Kirk JA, Ansell BM, Bywaters EG. The hypermobility syndrome: musculoskeletal complaints associated with generalized joint hypermobility. Ann Rheum Dis. 1967. 26(5):419–425.
Article
30. Larsson LG, Baum J, Mudholkar GS, Srivastava DK. Hypermobility: prevalence and features in a Swedish population. Br J Rheumatol. 1993. 32(2):116–119.
Article
31. Jansson A, Saartok T, Werner S, Renstrom P. General joint laxity in 1845 Swedish school children of different ages: age- and gender-specific distributions. Acta Paediatr. 2004. 93(9):1202–1206.
Article
32. Larsson LG, Baum J, Mudholkar GS. Hypermobility: features and differential incidence between the sexes. Arthritis Rheum. 1987. 30(12):1426–1430.
Article
33. Quatman CE, Ford KR, Myer GD, Paterno MV, Hewett TE. The effects of gender and pubertal status on generalized joint laxity in young athletes. J Sci Med Sport. 2008. 11(3):257–263.
Article
34. Seckin U, Tur BS, Yilmaz O, Yagci I, Bodur H, Arasil T. The prevalence of joint hypermobility among high school students. Rheumatol Int. 2005. 25(4):260–263.
Article
35. Cheng JC, Chan PS, Hui PW. Joint laxity in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1991. 11(6):752–756.
Article
36. Seow CC, Chow PK, Khong KS. A study of joint mobility in a normal population. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1999. 28(2):231–236.
37. Birrell FN, Adebajo AO, Hazleman BL, Silman AJ. High prevalence of joint laxity in West Africans. Br J Rheumatol. 1994. 33(1):56–59.
Article
38. Klemp P, Williams SM, Stansfield SA. Articular mobility in Maori and European New Zealanders. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002. 41(5):554–557.
Article
39. McCormack M, Briggs J, Hakim A, Grahame R. Joint laxity and the benign joint hypermobility syndrome in student and professional ballet dancers. J Rheumatol. 2004. 31(1):173–178.
40. Al-Rawi ZS, Al-Aszawi AJ, Al-Chalabi T. Joint mobility among university students in Iraq. Br J Rheumatol. 1985. 24(4):326–331.
Article
41. Jessee EF, Owen DS Jr, Sagar KB. The benign hypermobile joint syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 1980. 23(9):1053–1056.
Article
42. Boden BP, Dean GS, Feagin JA Jr, Garrett WE Jr. Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Orthopedics. 2000. 23(6):573–578.
Article
43. Griffin LY, Agel J, Albohm MJ, et al. Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: risk factors and prevention strategies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000. 8(3):141–150.
Article
44. Ireland ML. The female ACL: why is it more prone to Injury? Orthop Clin North Am. 2002. 33(4):637–651.
Article
45. Ostenberg A, Roos H. Injury risk factors in female European football: a prospective study of 123 players during one season. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2000. 10(5):279–285.
Article
46. Uhorchak JM, Scoville CR, Williams GN, Arciero RA, St Pierre P, Taylor DC. Risk factors associated with noncontact injury of the anterior cruciate ligament: a prospective four-year evaluation of 859 West Point cadets. Am J Sports Med. 2003. 31(6):831–842.
Article
47. Harner CD, Paulos LE, Greenwald AE, Rosenberg TD, Cooley VC. Detailed analysis of patients with bilateral anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1994. 22(1):37–43.
Article
48. Loudon JK, Goist HL, Loudon KL. Genu recurvatum syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998. 27(5):361–367.
Article
49. Beckett ME, Massie DL, Bowers KD, Stoll DA. Incidence of hyperpronation in the ACL injured knee: a clinical perspective. J Athl Train. 1992. 27(1):58–62.
50. El O, Akcali O, Kosay C, et al. Flexible flatfoot and related factors in primary school children: a report of a screening study. Rheumatol Int. 2006. 26(11):1050–1053.
Article
51. Rao UB, Joseph B. The influence of footwear on the prevalence of flat foot: a survey of 2300 children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992. 74(4):525–527.
Article
52. Sachithanandam V, Joseph B. The influence of footwear on the prevalence of flat foot: a survey of 1846 skeletally mature persons. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995. 77(2):254–257.
Article
53. Kim SJ, Jung KA, Song DH. Arthroscopic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous quadriceps tendon. Arthroscopy. 2006. 22(7):797.e1–797.e5.
Article
54. Kim SJ, Kumar P, Oh KS. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: autogenous quadriceps tendon-bone compared with bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts at 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2009. 25(2):137–144.
Article
55. Jackson DW, Simon TM. Donor cell survival and repopulation after intraarticular transplantation of tendon and ligament allografts. Microsc Res Tech. 2002. 58(1):25–33.
Article
56. Victor J, Bellemans J, Witvrouw E, Govaers K, Fabry G. Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-prospective analysis of patellar tendon autografts compared with allografts. Int Orthop. 1997. 21(2):93–97.
Article
57. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002. 84(9):1503–1513.
Article
58. O'Neill DB. Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a prospective randomized analysis of three techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996. 78(6):803–813.
59. Otero AL, Hutcheson L. A comparison of the doubled semitendinosus/gracilis and central third of the patellar tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1993. 9(2):143–148.
Article
60. Aune AK, Holm I, Risberg MA, Jensen HK, Steen H. Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft compared with patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized study with two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2001. 29(6):722–728.
Article
61. Eriksson K, Anderberg P, Hamberg P, et al. A comparison of quadruple semitendinosus and patellar tendon grafts in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001. 83(3):348–354.
Article
62. Shaieb MD, Kan DM, Chang SK, Marumoto JM, Richardson AB. A prospective randomized comparison of patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2002. 30(2):214–220.
Article
63. Gobbi A, Domzalski M, Pascual J. Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in male and female athletes using the patellar tendon and hamstring autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004. 12(6):534–539.
Article
64. Noojin FK, Barrett GR, Hartzog CW, Nash CR. Clinical comparison of intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons in men versus women. Am J Sports Med. 2000. 28(6):783–789.
Article
65. Kim SJ, Moon HK, Kim SG, Chun YM, Oh KS. Does severity or specific joint laxity influence clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010. 468(4):1136–1141.
Article
66. Jagodzinski M, Richter GM, Passler HH. Biomechanical analysis of knee hyperextension and of the impingement of the anterior cruciate ligament: a cinematographic MRI study with impact on tibial tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000. 8(1):11–19.
Article
67. Nishimori M, Sumen Y, Sakaridani K, Nakamura M. An evaluation of reconstructed ACL impingement on PCL using MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007. 25(5):722–726.
Article
68. Arneja S, Froese W, MacDonald P. Augmentation of femoral fixation in hamstring anterior cruciate ligament re construction with a bioabsorbable bead: a prospective single-blind randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2004. 32(1):159–163.
Article
69. Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC. The science of anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002. (402):9–20.
Article
70. Kim SJ, Kim HK, Lee YT. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous hamstring tendon graft without detachment of the tibial insertion. Arthroscopy. 1997. 13(5):656–660.
Article
71. Kim SJ, Jo SB, Kim TW, Chang JH, Choi HS, Oh KS. A modified arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament double-bundle reconstruction technique with autogenous quadriceps tendon graft: remnant-preserving technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009. 129(3):403–407.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CIOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr