Korean J Ophthalmol.  2009 Jun;23(2):135-135. 10.3341/kjo.2009.23.2.135.

P-VEP as Predictor of Occlusion Therapy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physiology, University College of Medical Sciences, University of Delhi, Dilshad Garden-110095, Delhi, India. dr.satendra@gmail.com

Abstract

No abstract available.


MeSH Terms

Amblyopia/physiopathology/*therapy
Evoked Potentials, Visual/*physiology
Humans
Monitoring, Physiologic/*methods
Prognosis
*Sensory Deprivation
Treatment Outcome
Visual Acuity

Reference

1. Shotton K, Elliott S. Interventions for strabismic amblyopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008. 16:CD006461.
2. Wright KW, Spiegel PH. Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2002. 2nd ed. Springer;113–114.
3. Choi MY, Lee KM, Hwang JM, et al. Comparison between anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001. 85:1052–1056.
4. Holmes JM, Repka MX, Kraker RT, Clarke MP. The treatment of amblyopia. Strabismus. 2006. 14:37–42.
5. Heravian J, Ostadi-Moghaddam H, Yekta AA, et al. Pattern visual evoked potential in response to monocular and binocular stimulation in normal and amblyope subjects. IRCMJ. 2008. 10:69–74.
6. Zhang W, Zhao K. Multifocal VEP difference between early- and late-onset strabismus amblyopia. Doc Ophthalmol. 2005. 110:173–180.
Full Text Links
  • KJO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr