J Liver Cancer.  2025 Mar;25(1):99-108. 10.17998/jlc.2025.02.02.

Microwave ablation vs. liver resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinomas

Affiliations
  • 1Epidemiologic and Biostatical Methods for Public Health and Clinical Research, Master of Public Health Program, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
  • 2Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Radiology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Department of Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
  • 5Department of Internal Medicine and The Catholic University Liver Research Center, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims
Microwave ablation (MWA) is an emerging ablative therapy that surpasses previous methods by achieving higher temperatures and creating larger ablation zones within shorter periods. This study compared the therapeutic outcomes of MWA with those of liver resection in real-world clinical practice.
Methods
A total of 178 patients with 259 nodules who underwent MWA or liver resection between January 2015 and July 2023 were enrolled. Local tumor progression (LTP)-free survival, overall progression (OP)-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were assessed based on the treatment modality for the index nodule.
Results
Of the 178 patients, 134 with 214 nodules underwent MWA, and 44 with 45 nodules underwent liver resection. The median follow-up period was 2.0±1.5 years. The annual incidence of LTP was 3.7% for MWA and 1.4% for liver resection. Treatment modality did not significantly affect LTP-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-2.69; P=0.511). For nodules larger than 3 cm, LTP-free survival was not affected by the treatment modality. Similarly, OP-free survival and OS were not influenced by treatment modality.
Conclusions
MWA and liver resection demonstrated comparable treatment outcomes in terms of local tumor control, overall recurrence, and survival. MWA may be an alternative treatment option for select patients; however, further studies are necessary to generalize these findings.

Keyword

Carcinoma, hepatocellular; Ablation techniques; Microwaves; Surgical procedures; operative

Figure

  • Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier analyses for LTP-free survival of MWA and liver resection-treated (A) entire 259 target nodules and (B) 80 target nodules ≥3 cm. LTP, local tumor progression; MWA, microwave ablation.

  • Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier analyses for (A) OP-free survival and (B) overall survival of 178 patients treated with MWA and liver resection. MWA, microwave ablation.


Reference

References

1. Vogel A, Meyer T, Sapisochin G, Salem R, Saborowski A. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2022; 400:1345–1362.
Article
2. Reig M, Forner A, Rimola J, Ferrer-Fàbrega J, Burrel M, Garcia-Criado Á, et al. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: the 2022 update. J Hepatol. 2022; 76:681–693.
Article
3. Korean Liver Cancer Association (KLCA); National Cancer Center (NCC) Korea. 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2022; 28:583–705.
4. Lee EC, Kim SH, Park H, Lee SD, Lee SA, Park SJ. Survival analysis after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a consecutive cohort of 1002 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 32:1055–1063.
Article
5. Yoon JS, Lee HA, Park JY, Kim BH, Lee IJ, Chon YE, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea between 2008 and 2011: an analysis of Korean Nationwide Cancer Registry. J Liver Cancer. 2020; 20:41–52.
Article
6. Tzeng CW, Cooper AB, Vauthey JN, Curley SA, Aloia TA. Predictors of morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy in elderly patients: analysis of 7621 NSQIP patients. HPB (Oxford). 2014; 16:459–468.
Article
7. Wang Q, Tang M, Zhang S. Comparison of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma conforming to the Milan criteria: a meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2021; 91:E432–E438.
Article
8. Lubner MG, Brace CL, Hinshaw JL, Lee FT Jr. Microwave tumor ablation: mechanism of action, clinical results, and devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010; 21 Suppl 8:S192–S203.
Article
9. Zhang M, Ma H, Zhang J, He L, Ye X, Li X. Comparison of microwave ablation and hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2017; 10:4829–4839.
Article
10. Park JI, Kim KH, Kim HJ, Cherqui D, Soubrane O, Kooby D, et al. Highlights of the Third Expert Forum of Asia-Pacific Laparoscopic Hepatectomy; Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgeons of Asia (ELSA) Visionary Summit 2017. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2018; 22:1–10.
Article
11. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45:228–247.
Article
12. Rossi S, Ravetta V, Rosa L, Ghittoni G, Viera FT, Garbagnati F, et al. Repeated radiofrequency ablation for management of patients with cirrhosis with small hepatocellular carcinomas: a long-term cohort study. Hepatology. 2011; 53:136–147.
Article
13. Han S, Sung PS, Park SY, Kim JW, Hong HP, Yoon JH, et al. Local ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: 2024 expert consensus-based practical recommendation of the Korean Liver Cancer Association. J Liver Cancer. 2024; 24:131–144.
Article
14. Sacks D, McClenny TE, Cardella JF, Lewis CA. Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003; 14:S199–S202.
Article
15. Serenari M, Ratti F, Guglielmo N, Zanello M, Mocchegiani F, Lenzi J, et al. Evolution of minimally invasive techniques and surgical outcomes of ALPPS in Italy: a comprehensive trend analysis over 10 years from a national prospective registry. Surg Endosc. 2023; 37:5285–5294.
Article
16. Izumi N, Hasegawa K, Nishioka Y, Takayama T, Yamanaka N, Kudo M, et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of surgery vs. radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma (SURF trial). J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37 Suppl 15:4002.
Article
17. Kim YS, Lim HK, Rhim H, Lee MW, Choi D, Lee WJ, et al. Ten-year outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation as first-line therapy of early hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of prognostic factors. J Hepatol. 2013; 58:89–97.
Article
18. Dou J, Cheng Z, Han Z, Liu F, Wang Z, Yu X, et al. Microwave ablation vs. surgical resection for treatment naïve hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a follow-up of at least 5 years. Cancer Biol Med. 2021; 19:1078–1088.
Article
19. Glassberg MB, Ghosh S, Clymer JW, Wright GWJ, Ferko N, Amaral JF. Microwave ablation compared with hepatic resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2019; 17:98.
Article
20. Sun Q, Shi J, Ren C, Du Z, Shu G, Wang Y. Survival analysis following microwave ablation or surgical resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma conforming to the Milan criteria. Oncol Lett. 2020; 19:4066–4076.
Article
21. Wicks JS, Dale BS, Ruffolo L, Pack LJ, Dunne R, Laryea MA, et al. Comparable and complimentary modalities for treatment of small-sized HCC: surgical resection, radiofrequency ablation, and microwave ablation. J Clin Med. 2023; 12:5006.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JLC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr