Korean J Pain.  2025 Apr;38(2):198-206. 10.3344/kjp.24343.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided superior trunk block versus clavipectoral fascial plane block for clavicular surgery: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

Abstract

Background
This study compared the quality and duration of analgesia between the superior trunk (ST) and the clavipectoral fascial plane (CFP) blocks in conjunction with a selective supraclavicular nerve (SCN) block for clavicular surgeries.
Methods
Fifty patients undergoing mid-third clavicular procedures were randomly assigned to the ST group (received an SCN block followed by blockage of the ST of the brachial plexus) and the CFP group (received an SCN block followed by the CFP block). The primary outcome was the time until the first rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes included total nalbuphine dosage and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores within the first 24 hours, the onset of sensory block, as well as deltoid and biceps muscle function using the modified Bromage score (MBS), diaphragmatic excursion, along with satisfaction levels.
Results
The ST group exhibited a more prolonged duration until the first request for rescue analgesia compared to the CFP group (18.76 ± 0.89 hours vs. 15.34 ± 1.38 hours), with a mean difference of 3.42 hours (95% confidence interval: 2.76 to 4.08, P < 0.001). The ST group consumed less nalbuphine and reported lower NRS scores at 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours than the CFP group. Additionally, the ST group exhibited a lower MBS and diaphragmatic excursion than the CFP group. However, the differences in the onset of sensory block and satisfaction levels were not statistically significant.
Conclusions
The ST group demonstrated superior outcomes in pain control with less favorable outcomes concerning diaphragmatic excursion and upper limb motor function.

Keyword

Analgesia; Brachial Plexus; Clavicle; Nerve Block; Pain; Postoperative; Ultrasonography; Interventional

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Ultrasonographic image of the SCN block. The needle is advanced close to the nerve using the in-plane technique. SCN: supraclavicular nerve, SCM: sternocleidomastoid muscle, C5: fifth cervical nerve root, C6: sixth cervical nerve root, ASM: anterior scalene muscle, MSM: middle scalene muscle.

  • Fig. 2 Ultrasonographic image of the ST block. The needle is directed from lateral to medial, using an in-plane technique. ST: superior trunk, LA: local anesthetics, ASM: anterior scalene muscle, MSM: middle scalene muscle.

  • Fig. 3 Ultrasonographic image of the CFP block. The needle is advanced in a caudal to cranial direction. CFP: clavipectoral fascial plane, Pec major: pectoralis major muscle, Subclavius: subclavius muscle, CPF: clavipectoral fascia.

  • Fig. 4 CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) flow chart.


Reference

1. Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F. 2002; Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 11:452–6. DOI: 10.1067/mse.2002.126613. PMID: 12378163.
Article
2. Virtanen KJ, Malmivaara AO, Remes VM, Paavola MP. 2012; Operative and nonoperative treatment of clavicle fractures in adults. Acta Orthop. 83:65–73. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2011.652884. PMID: 22248169. PMCID: PMC3278660.
Article
3. Ahrens PM, Garlick NI, Barber J, Tims EM. Clavicle Trial Collaborative Group. 2017; The clavicle trial: a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing operative with nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 99:1345–54. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01112. PMID: 28816894.
4. Tran DQ, Tiyaprasertkul W, González AP. 2013; Analgesia for clavicular fracture and surgery: a call for evidence. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 38:539–43. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000012. PMID: 24121609.
5. Banerjee S, Acharya R, Sriramka B. 2019; Ultrasound-guided inter-scalene brachial plexus block with superficial cervical plexus block compared with general anesthesia in patients undergoing clavicular surgery: a comparative analysis. Anesth Essays Res. 13:149–54. DOI: 10.4103/aer.AER_185_18. PMID: 31031496. PMCID: PMC6444954.
Article
6. Mosaffa F, Ghasemi M, Habibi A, Minaei R, Bazgir N, Memary E, et al. 2024; Efficacy comparison between interscalene block with and without superficial cervical plexus block for anesthesia in clavicle surgery. Anesth Pain Med. 14:e142051. DOI: 10.5812/aapm-142051.
Article
7. Oh C, Noh C, Eom H, Lee S, Park S, Lee S, et al. 2020; Costoclavicular brachial plexus block reduces hemidiaphragmatic paralysis more than supraclavicular brachial plexus block: retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study. Korean J Pain. 33:144–52. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2020.33.2.144. PMID: 32235015. PMCID: PMC7136300.
Article
8. Kim DH, Lin Y, Beathe JC, Liu J, Oxendine JA, Haskins SC, et al. 2019; Superior trunk block: a phrenic-sparing alternative to the interscalene block: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 131:521–33. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002841. PMID: 31283740.
9. Sivashanmugam T, Areti A, Selvum E, Diwan S, Pandian A. 2021; Selective blockade of supraclavicular nerves and upper trunk of brachial plexus "The SCUT block" towards a site-specific regional anaesthesia strategy for clavicle surgeries - A descriptive study. Indian J Anaesth. 65:656–61. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_255_21. PMID: 34764500. PMCID: PMC8577712.
Article
10. Valdés-Vilches LF, Sánchez-del Águila MJ. 2014; Anesthesia for clavicular fracture: selective supraclavicular nerve block is the key. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 39:258–9. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000057. PMID: 24747317.
11. Burckett-St Laurent D, Chan V, Chin KJ. 2014; Refining the ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block: the superior trunk approach. Can J Anaesth. 61:1098–102. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-014-0237-3. PMID: 25208976.
Article
12. Ince I, Kilicaslan A, Roques V, Elsharkawy H, Valdes L. 2019; Ultrasound-guided clavipectoral fascial plane block in a patient undergoing clavicular surgery. J Clin Anesth. 58:125–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.07.011. PMID: 31377668.
Article
13. Kang R, Jeong JS, Chin KJ, Yoo JC, Lee JH, Choi SJ, et al. 2019; Superior trunk block provides noninferior analgesia compared with interscalene brachial plexus block in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Anesthesiology. 131:1316–26. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002919. PMID: 31490292.
Article
14. Yoshimura M, Morimoto Y. 2020; Use of clavipectoral fascial plane block for clavicle fracture: two case reports. Saudi J Anaesth. 14:284–5. DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_52_20. PMID: 32317907. PMCID: PMC7164465.
Article
15. Elsharkawy H, Pawa A, Mariano ER. 2018; Interfascial plane blocks: back to basics. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 43:341–6. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000750. PMID: 29561295.
Article
16. Maybin J, Townsley P, Bedforth N, Allan A. 2011; Ultrasound guided supraclavicular nerve blockade: first technical description and the relevance for shoulder surgery under regional anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 66:1053–5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06907.x. PMID: 22004208.
Article
17. Gonçalves D, Sousa CP, Graça R, Miguelez MP, Sampaio C. 2023; Clavipectoral fascia plane block combined with superficial cervical plexus block for the removal of osteosynthesis material from clavicle fracture. Cureus. 15:e43146. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43146.
Article
18. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. 2010; CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 340:c869. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c869. PMID: 20332511. PMCID: PMC2844943.
Article
19. Zeng J, Chen Q, Yu C, Zhou J, Yang B. 2021; The use of magnesium sulfate and peripheral nerve blocks: an updated meta-analysis and systematic review. Clin J Pain. 37:629–37. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000944. PMID: 34128482.
20. Sehmbi H, Brull R, Ceballos KR, Shah UJ, Martin J, Tobias A, et al. 2021; Perineural and intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine: network meta-analysis of adjunctive effects on supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Anaesthesia. 76:974–90. DOI: 10.1111/anae.15288. PMID: 33118163.
Article
21. O'Donnell BD, Iohom G. 2009; An estimation of the minimum effective anesthetic volume of 2% lidocaine in ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block. Anesthesiology. 111:25–9. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a915c7. PMID: 19512869.
22. El-Boghdadly K, Chin KJ, Chan VWS. 2017; Phrenic nerve palsy and regional anesthesia for shoulder surgery: anatomical, physiologic, and clinical considerations. Anesthesiology. 127:173–91. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001668. PMID: 28514241.
23. Errick JK, Heel RC. 1983; Nalbuphine. A preliminary review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs. 26:191–211. DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198326030-00002. PMID: 6137354.
Article
24. Ghali AM, Mahfouz KM, Ihanamäki T, El Btarny AM. 2010; Dexmedetomidine versus propofol for sedation in patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery under sub-Tenon's anesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 27:39. DOI: 10.1097/00003643-201006121-00124.
Article
25. Zhuo Q, Zheng Y, Hu Z, Xiong J, Wu Y, Zheng Y, et al. 2022; Ultrasound-guided clavipectoral fascial plane block with intermediate cervical plexus block for midshaft clavicular surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 135:633–40. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005911. PMID: 35061634.
Article
26. Robles C, Berardone N, Orebaugh S. 2022; Effect of superior trunk block on diaphragm function and respiratory parameters after shoulder surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 47:167–70. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102962. PMID: 35012990.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr