Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2024 Nov;28(4):522-526. 10.14701/ahbps.24-092.

Segments 4, 7, and 8 liver resection: A case report

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Organ Transplantation, Navy Medical Center, Mexico City, Mexico
  • 2Mexico Liver Transplant Study Group, Mexico City, Mexico
  • 3Department of Hepatobiliary Sciences and Liver Transplantation, King Abdullah Specialized Children’s Hospital, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Right superior resection (segments 7 and 8) is an uncommon resection for liver malignancies, with most of the literature limited to case reports and small series. Resection of segments 4, 7, and 8 has been reported in only a few cases. When the right hepatic vein is resected, venous reconstruction or identification of one or more right inferior hepatic veins is considered mandatory, to maintain segmentary function of segments 5 and 6. We present a case of liver resection of segments 4, 7, and 8 including the right and middle hepatic veins for symptomatic benign liver disease with no right hepatic vein reconstruction, nor a prominent right inferior hepatic vein(s). After the resection, there was no change in liver function tests, and the patient made an unremarkable recovery. Three months after the operation, partial atrophy of segments 5 and 6 with hypertrophy of the left lateral section was observed, while two and one half years after resection, the patient is asymptomatic. When right hepatic vein reconstruction would add unnecessary operative time, and there is low likelihood of the need for repeated resection, particularly when the hepatic vein is difficult to dissect, this approach can be safe and useful, while providing an adequate postoperative liver mass in the short-term to recover uneventfully from major liver resection.

Keyword

Hepatectomy; Polycystic liver disease; Hepatic veins; Case reports

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Preoperative unenhanced abdominal computed tomography. Contrast was injected into the drained cyst in a previous study. (A, B) Axial views of segments 7 and 8; (C) large cyst in a small segment 4 with viable parenchyma in segments 5 and 6. (D) Digital reconstruction showing parenchyma in gray, liver cysts in orange, drain in white, and large, partially drained central cyst in pink.

  • Fig. 2 Surgical view of the liver before resection.

  • Fig. 3 Surgical view of the liver after resection. (A) After parenchymal transection; (B) after specimen removal.

  • Fig. 4 Unenhanced abdominal computed tomography 90 days after liver resection. (A) Small, asymptomatic right pleural effusion. (B, C) Partial atrophy of segments 5 and 6 with hypertrophy of the left lateral section. (D) Postoperative digital reconstruction of unenhanced computed tomography two and a half years after the operation, showing parenchyma in gray, and liver cysts in orange.


Reference

References

1. Kokudo N, Takemura N, Ito K, Mihara F. 2020; The history of liver surgery: achievements over the past 50 years. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 4:109–117. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12322. PMID: 32258975. PMCID: PMC7105847.
2. Deng G, Li H, Jia GQ, Fang D, Tang YY, Xie J, et al. 2019; Parenchymal-sparing versus extended hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Med. 8:6165–6175. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2515. PMID: 31464101. PMCID: PMC6797569.
3. Makdissi FF, Kruger JAP, Jeismann VB, Herman P. 2021; Feasibility of right upper transversal hepatectomy in the absence of an inferior right hepatic vein: new insights regarding this complex procedure. Case Rep Surg. 2021:6668269. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6668269. PMID: 33747594. PMCID: PMC7960046.
4. Liu F, Wei Y, Li B. 2022; Pure laparoscopic right upper transversal hepatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 29:2977. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11331-8. PMID: 35066717.
5. Vauthey JN, Abdalla EK, Doherty DA, Gertsch P, Fenstermacher MJ, Loyer EM, et al. 2002; Body surface area and body weight predict total liver volume in Western adults. Liver Transpl. 8:233–240. DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2002.31654. PMID: 11910568.
6. Bernts LHP, Neijenhuis MK, Edwards ME, Sloan JA, Fischer J, Smoot RL, et al. 2020; Symptom relief and quality of life after combined partial hepatectomy and cyst fenestration in highly symptomatic polycystic liver disease. Surgery. 168:25–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.02.014. PMID: 32402542. PMCID: PMC7347464.
7. Chebib FT, Harmon A, Irazabal Mira MV, Jung YS, Edwards ME, Hogan MC, et al. 2016; Outcomes and durability of hepatic reduction after combined partial hepatectomy and cyst fenestration for massive polycystic liver disease. J Am Coll Surg. 223:118–126.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.051. PMID: 27016902. PMCID: PMC4967356.
8. Chansangrat J, Keeratibharat N. 2021; Portal vein embolization: rationale, techniques, outcomes and novel strategies. Hepat Oncol. 8:HEP42. DOI: 10.2217/hep-2021-0006. PMID: 34765107. PMCID: PMC8577518.
9. Gandhi CR, Murase N, Subbotin VM, Uemura T, Nalesnik M, Demetris AJ, et al. 2002; Portacaval shunt causes apoptosis and liver atrophy in rats despite increases in endogenous levels of major hepatic growth factors. J Hepatol. 37:340–348. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00165-4. PMID: 12175629.
10. Zamora-Valdés D, Contreras AG, Mercado MA. 2014; Liver transplantation for polycystic liver disease. J Am Coll Surg. 219:1192. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.09.008. PMID: 25458240.
11. European Association for the Study of the Liver. 2022; EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of cystic liver diseases. J Hepatol. 77:1083–1108. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.06.002. PMID: 35728731.
12. Wurster EF, Tenckhoff S, Probst P, Jensen K, Dolger E, Knebel P, et al. 2017; A systematic review and meta-analysis of the utility of repeated versus single hepatic resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases. HPB (Oxford). 19:491–497. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.02.440. PMID: 28347640.
13. Bartsch F, Eberhard J, Ruckert F, Schmelzle M, Lehwald-Tywuschik N, Fichtner-Feigl S, et al. 2021; Repeated resection for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective German multicentre study. Liver Int. 41:180–191. DOI: 10.1111/liv.14682. PMID: 32997886.
14. Midorikawa Y, Takayama T, Moriguchi M, Yagi R, Yamagishi S, Nakayama H, et al. 2020; Liver resection versus embolization for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg. 44:232–240. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-05225-2. PMID: 31605170.
15. Urbani L, Roffi N, Signori S, Balestri R, Colombatto P, Licitra G, et al. 2022; Upper transversal hepatectomy with double hepatic vein resection and reconstruction to treat colorectal cancer liver metastases at the hepatocaval confluence: a strategy to achieve R0 liver-sparing resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 407:1741–1750. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02409-0. PMID: 35028737.
16. Panaro F, Al-Farai A, Cubisino A, Testa G. 2022; Parenchyma sparing hepatic resection with right hepatic vein reconstruction: lesson learned from living donor liver transplantation. J Gastrointest Surg. 26:1963–1966. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05314-z. PMID: 35411499.
Full Text Links
  • AHBPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr