Korean J Gastroenterol.  2024 Jan;83(1):41-43. 10.4166/kjg.2023.149.

Method for Measuring Spastic Segment Length for Tailored Myotomy in Type 3 Achalasia

• Lee JY

• KMID: 2552243
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2023.149

Reference

1. Low EE, Hasan A, Fehmi SA, et al. 2023; Diagnostic methods to measure spastic segment and guide tailored myotomy length in type 3 achalasia. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 35:e14625. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14625. PMID: 37288617. PMCID: PMC10726676.

2. Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, et al. 2021; Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0^©. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 33:e14058. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14053. PMID: 33340190. PMCID: PMC8098672.

3. Kahrilas PJ, Katzka D, Richter JE. 2017; Clinical practice update: The use of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia: expert review and best practice advice from the AGA institute. Gastroenterology. 153:1205–1211. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.001. PMID: 28989059. PMCID: PMC5670013.

4. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Carlson DA, Pandolfino JE. 2018; Advances in management of esophageal motility disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 16:1692–1700. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.026. PMID: 29702296. PMCID: PMC6317712.

5. Kane ED, Budhraja V, Desilets DJ, Romanelli JR. 2019; Myotomy length informed by high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) results in improved per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) outcomes for type III achalasia. Surg Endosc. 33:886–894. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6356-0. PMID: 30054739.

6. Kumbhari V, Tieu AH, Onimaru M, et al. 2015; Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for the treatment of Type III achalasia in 75 patients: a multicenter comparative study. Endosc Int Open. 3:E195–201. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391668. PMID: 26171430. PMCID: PMC4486039.

7. Hasan A, Low EE, Fehmi SA, Yadlapati R. 2022; Evolution and evidence-based adaptations in techniques for peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 96:189–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.004. PMID: 35278427. PMCID: PMC9838104.

8. Serrano L, Saad AR, DuCoin C, Jacobs JW, Richter JE, Velanovich V. 2021; Discordance between high-resolution manometry, esophagoscopy and contrast esophagogram in determining landmarks for per-oral endoscopic myotomy in spastic esophageal disorders: a word of caution. Surg Endosc. 35:5613–5619. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08064-8. PMID: 33048228.

9. Zou K, Xu H, Peng Y, Tang X. 2023; Tailored myotomy length in peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: Combination of high-resolution esophageal manometry and endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 35:e14650. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14650. PMID: 37496279.

10. Yoo IK, Choi SA, Kim WH, Hong SP, Cakir OO, Cho JY. 2019; Assessment of clinical outcomes after peroral endoscopic myotomy via esophageal distensibility measurements with the endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe. Gut Liver. 13:32–39. DOI: 10.5009/gnl18233. PMID: 30400727. PMCID: PMC6346997.

11. Knowles TB, Jackson AS, Chang SC, et al. 2022; Changes in distensibility index during an incremental POEM myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 26:1140–1146. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05278-0. PMID: 35233701.

12. Holmstrom AL, Campagna RAJ, Cirera A, et al. 2021; Intraoperative use of FLIP is associated with clinical success following POEM for achalasia. Surg Endosc. 35:3090–3096. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07739-6. PMID: 32632483.