Diabetes Metab J.  2023 Nov;47(6):818-825. 10.4093/dmj.2023.0171.

The Efficacy and Safety of Moderate-Intensity Rosuvastatin with Ezetimibe versus High-Intensity Rosuvastatin in High Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open, Parallel, Phase 4 Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
  • 3Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
  • 4Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul,
  • 5Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
  • 6Department of Internal Medicine, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
  • 7Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
  • 8Clinical Operation Team, Yuhan Corporation, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
To investigate the efficacy and safety of moderate-intensity rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combination compared to highintensity rosuvastatin in high atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Methods
This study was a randomized, multicenter, open, parallel phase 4 study, and enrolled T2DM subjects with an estimated 10-year ASCVD risk ≥7.5%. The primary endpoint was the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) change rate after 24-week rosuvastatin 10 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg treatment was non-inferior to that of rosuvastatin 20 mg. The achievement proportion of 10-year ASCVD risk <7.5% or comprehensive lipid target (LDL-C <70 mg/dL, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL, and apolipoprotein B <80 mg/dL) without discontinuation, and several metabolic parameters were explored as secondary endpoints.
Results
A hundred and six participants were assigned to each group. Both groups showed significant reduction in % change of LDL-C from baseline at week 24 (–63.90±6.89 vs. –55.44±6.85, combination vs. monotherapy, p=0.0378; respectively), but the combination treatment was superior to high-intensity monotherapy in LDL-C change (%) from baseline (least square [LS] mean difference, –8.47; 95% confidence interval, –16.44 to –0.49; p=0.0378). The combination treatment showed a higher proportion of achieved comprehensive lipid targets rather than monotherapy (85.36% vs. 62.22% in monotherapy, p=0.015). The ezetimibe combination significantly improved homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function even without A1c changes (LS mean difference, 17.13; p=0.0185).
Conclusion
In high ASCVD risk patients with T2DM, the combination of moderate-intensity rosuvastatin and ezetimibe was not only non-inferior but also superior to improving dyslipidemia with additional benefits compared to high-intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy.

Keyword

Cardiovascular diseases; Diabetes mellitus, type 2; Drug therapy, combination; Ezetimibe; Rosuvastatin calcium

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Primary endpoint. Comparison of the change of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) rate (%) at 24 weeks. (A) Perprotocol set (PPS) and (B) full analysis set (FAS). LS, least square; R, rosuvastatin 20 mg; R/E, rosuvastatin 10 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg; CI, confidence interval. aP<0.05.

  • Fig. 2. Secondary endpoints. (A) Changes of lipid profiles after 24 weeks. (B) Changes of homeostatic model assessment index. LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LS, least square; R, rosuvastatin 20 mg; R/E, rosuvastatin 10 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg; CI, confidence interval; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; ApoB, apolipoprotein B; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; HOMA-β, homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function. aP<0.05.


Reference

1. Mottillo S, Filion KB, Genest J, Joseph L, Pilote L, Poirier P, et al. The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56:1113–32.
2. Tomlinson B, Patil NG, Fok M, Lam CW. Managing dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021; 22:2221–34.
Article
3. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63(25 Pt B):2889–934.
4. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73:3168–209.
5. Liao JK. Safety and efficacy of statins in Asians. Am J Cardiol. 2007; 99:410–4.
Article
6. Mulder AB, van Lijf HJ, Bon MA, van den Bergh FA, Touw DJ, Neef C, et al. Association of polymorphism in the cytochrome CYP2D6 and the efficacy and tolerability of simvastatin. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001; 70:546–51.
Article
7. Naito R, Miyauchi K, Daida H. Racial differences in the cholesterol-lowering effect of statin. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2017; 24:19–25.
Article
8. Gagne C, Bays HE, Weiss SR, Mata P, Quinto K, Melino M, et al. Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe added to ongoing statin therapy for treatment of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 90:1084–91.
Article
9. Ballantyne CM, Houri J, Notarbartolo A, Melani L, Lipka LJ, Suresh R, et al. Effect of ezetimibe coadministered with atorvastatin in 628 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Circulation. 2003; 107:2409–15.
Article
10. Kim BK, Hong SJ, Lee YJ, Hong SJ, Yun KH, Hong BK, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy versus high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (RACING): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2022; 400:380–90.
Article
11. Hwang YC, Jun JE, Jeong IK, Ahn KJ, Chung HY. Comparison of the efficacy of rosuvastatin monotherapy 20 mg with rosuvastatin 5 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg combination therapy on lipid parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab J. 2019; 43:582–9.
Article
12. Lee J, Hwang YC, Lee WJ, Won JC, Song KH, Park CY, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combination therapy and rosuvastatin monotherapy on lipoprotein in patients with type 2 diabetes: multicenter randomized controlled study. Diabetes Ther. 2020; 11:859–71.
Article
13. Rhee MY, Kim KJ, Kim SH, Yoon YW, Rha SW, Hong SJ, et al. Ezetimibe and rosuvastatin combination treatment can reduce the dose of rosuvastatin without compromising its lipid-lowering efficacy. Clin Ther. 2019; 41:2571–92.
Article
14. Ridker PM, Pradhan A, MacFadyen JG, Libby P, Glynn RJ. Cardiovascular benefits and diabetes risks of statin therapy in primary prevention: an analysis from the JUPITER trial. Lancet. 2012; 380:565–71.
Article
15. Kim YS, Han YE, Choi EA, You NY, Lee JW, You HS, et al. Statin use increased new-onset diabetes in hypercholesterolemic individuals: data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Health Screening Cohort database (NHIS-HEALS). Prim Care Diabetes. 2020; 14:246–53.
Article
16. Carmena R, Betteridge DJ. Diabetogenic action of statins: mechanisms. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2019; 21:23.
Article
17. Abbasi F, Lamendola C, Harris CS, Harris V, Tsai MS, Tripathi P, et al. Statins are associated with increased insulin resistance and secretion. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2021; 41:2786–97.
Article
18. Yang SJ, Choi JM, Kim L, Kim BJ, Sohn JH, Kim WJ, et al. Chronic administration of ezetimibe increases active glucagonlike peptide-1 and improves glycemic control and pancreatic beta cell mass in a rat model of type 2 diabetes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011; 407:153–7.
Article
19. Yoon JS, Moon JS, Kim YW, Won KC, Lee HW. The glucotoxicity protecting effect of ezetimibe in pancreatic beta cells via inhibition of CD36. J Korean Med Sci. 2016; 31:547–52.
Article
20. Riaz H, Khan AR, Khan MS, Rehman KA, Alansari SA, Gheyath B, et al. Meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials on the prevalence of statin intolerance. Am J Cardiol. 2017; 120:774–81.
Article
21. Thakker D, Nair S, Pagada A, Jamdade V, Malik A. Statin use and the risk of developing diabetes: a network meta-analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016; 25:1131–49.
Article
22. Thongtang N, Tangkittikasem N, Samaithongcharoen K, Piyapromdee J, Srinonprasert V, Sriussadaporn S. Effect of switching from low-dose simvastatin to high-dose atorvastatin on glucose homeostasis and cognitive function in type 2 diabetes. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2020; 16:367–77.
Full Text Links
  • DMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr