Restor Dent Endod.  2021 Feb;46(1):e8. 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e8.

YouTube as an information source for instrument separation in root canal treatment

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karabük University, Karabük, Turkey

Abstract


Objectives
The reliability and educational quality of videos on YouTube for patients seeking information regarding instrument separation in root canal treatment were evaluated.
Materials and Methods
YouTube was searched for videos on instrument separation in root canal treatment. Video content was scored based on reliability in terms of 3 categories (etiology, procedure, and prognosis) and based on video flow, quality, and educational usefulness using the Global Quality Score (GQS). Descriptive statistics were obtained and the data were analyzed using analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Results
The highest mean completeness scores were obtained for videos published by dentists or specialists (1.48 ± 1.06). There was no statistically significant difference among sources of upload in terms of content completeness. The highest mean GQS was found for videos published by dentists or specialists (1.82 ± 0.96), although there was no statistically significant correlation between GQS and the source of upload.
Conclusions
Videos on YouTube have incomplete and low-quality content for patients who are concerned about instrument separation during endodontic treatment, or who experience this complication during endodontic treatment.

Keyword

Endodontics; Internet; Root Canal Preparation; Intraoperative Complications

Reference

1. da Silva Pierro VS, de Morais AP, Granado L, Maia LC. An unusual accident during a primary molar extraction. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010; 34:193–195. PMID: 20578653.
Article
2. Parashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod. 2006; 32:1031–1043. PMID: 17055902.
Article
3. Knowles KI, Hammond NB, Biggs SG, Ibarrola JL. Incidence of instrument separation using LightSpeed rotary instruments. J Endod. 2006; 32:14–16. PMID: 16410061.
Article
4. Wolcott S, Wolcott J, Ishley D, Kennedy W, Johnson S, Minnich S, Meyers J. Separation incidence of protaper rotary instruments: a large cohort clinical evaluation. J Endod. 2006; 32:1139–1141. PMID: 17174668.
Article
5. Iqbal MK, Kohli MR, Kim JS. A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics graduate program: a PennEndo database study. J Endod. 2006; 32:1048–1052. PMID: 17055904.
Article
6. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod. 2000; 26:161–165. PMID: 11199711.
Article
7. Fors UG, Berg JO. A method for the removal of broken endodontic instruments from root canals. J Endod. 1983; 9:156–159. PMID: 6574203.
Article
8. Souza RA, Dantas JC, Colombo S, Lago M, Pécora JD. Apical limit of root canal filling and its relationship with success on endodontic treatment of a mandibular molar: 11-year follow-up. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 112:e48–e50.
Article
9. Lin LM, Rosenberg PA, Lin J. Do procedural errors cause endodontic treatment failure? J Am Dent Assoc. 2005; 136:187–193. PMID: 15782522.
Article
10. Kirkevang LL, Hørsted‐Bindslev P. Technical aspects of treatment in relation to treatment outcome. Endod Topics. 2002; 2:89–102.
Article
11. Kirkevang LL, Vaeth M, Wenzel A. Tooth-specific risk indicators for apical periodontitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 97:739–744. PMID: 15184857.
Article
12. Spili P, Parashos P, Messer HH. The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 2005; 31:845–850. PMID: 16306815.
Article
13. Guild Insurance. Clinical guide in risk management for dentists. Melbourne: Guild Insurance Limited;2004.
14. Bjørndal L, Reit C. Endodontic malpractice claims in Denmark 1995-2004. Int Endod J. 2008; 41:1059–1065. PMID: 18811595.
Article
15. Wilkinson EJ. Endodontics in posteriors. Aust Dento-Legal Rev. 2004; 22–23.
16. Barker P. Congratulations! Aust Dento-Legal Rev. 2004; 2–5.
17. Kılınç DD, Sayar G. Assessment of reliability of YouTube videos on orthodontics. Turk J Orthod. 2019; 32:145–150. PMID: 31565689.
Article
18. Dias da Silva MA, Pereira AC, Walmsley AD. Who is providing dental education content via YouTube? Br Dent J. 2019; 226:437–440. PMID: 30903071.
Article
19. Özdal Zincir Ö, Bozkurt AP, Gaş S. Potential patient education of YouTube videos related to wisdom tooth surgical removal. J Craniofac Surg. 2019; 30:e481–e484. PMID: 31299822.
Article
20. Knösel M, Jung K, Bleckmann A. YouTube, dentistry, and dental education. J Dent Educ. 2011; 75:1558–1568. PMID: 22184594.
Article
21. Abukaraky A, Hamdan AA, Ameera MN, Nasief M, Hassona Y. Quality of YouTubeTM videos on dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018; 23:e463–e468. PMID: 29924766.
22. Nason K, Donnelly A, Duncan HF. YouTube as a patient-information source for root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2016; 49:1194–1200. PMID: 26551481.
Article
23. Lena Y, Dindaroğlu F. Lingual orthodontic treatment: a YouTube™ video analysis. Angle Orthod. 2018; 88:208–214. PMID: 29257704.
Article
24. Gaş S, Zincir OO, Bozkurt AP. Are YouTube videos useful for patients interested in botulinum toxin for bruxism? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 77:1776–1783. PMID: 31077674.
Article
25. Hutchison CM, Cave V, Walshaw EG, Burns B, Park C. YouTube as a source for patient education about the management of dental avulsion injuries. Dent Traumatol. 2020; 36:207–211. PMID: 31606932.
Article
26. ElKarmi R, Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Scully C. YouTube as a source for parents' education on early childhood caries. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017; 27:437–443. PMID: 27882621.
Article
27. Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis. 2016; 22:202–208. PMID: 26718020.
Article
28. Hegarty E, Campbell C, Grammatopoulos E, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. YouTube™ as an information resource for orthognathic surgery. J Orthod. 2017; 44:90–96. PMID: 28463076.
Article
29. Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine. 2018; 43:E1334–E1339. PMID: 29664816.
Article
30. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012; 39:899–903. PMID: 22467934.
Article
31. Yilmaz Ferhatoglu S, Kudsioglu T. Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the information in cardiopulmonary resuscitation videos shared on Open access video sharing platform YouTube. Australas Emerg Care. 2020; 23:211–216. PMID: 32563667.
Article
32. Ustdal G, Guney AU. YouTube as a source of information about orthodontic clear aligners. Angle Orthod. 2020; 90:419–424. PMID: 33378436.
Article
Full Text Links
  • RDE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr