Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Stroke.  2023 Sep;25(3):388-398. 10.5853/jos.2023.01641.

Mode of Imaging Study and Endovascular Therapy for a Large Ischemic Core: Insights From the RESCUE-Japan LIMIT

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan
  • 2Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan
  • 3Neurovascular Research & Neuroendovascular Therapy, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
  • 4Department of Stroke Neurology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
  • 5Department of Cerebrovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
  • 6Division of Stroke Prevention and Treatment, Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
  • 7Division of Development and Discovery of Interventional Therapy, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
  • 8Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
  • 9Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan

Abstract

Background and Purpose
Differences in measurement of the extent of acute ischemic stroke using the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomographic Score (ASPECTS) by non-contrast computed tomography (CT-ASPECTS stratum) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI-ASPECTS stratum) may impact the efficacy of endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with a large ischemic core.
Methods
The RESCUE-Japan LIMIT (Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-acute Embolism Japan–Large IscheMIc core Trial) was a multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of EVT in patients with ASPECTS of 3–5. CT-ASPECTS was prioritized when both CT-ASPECTS and DWI-ASPECTS were measured. The effects of EVT on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days were assessed separately for each stratum.
Results
Among 183 patients, 112 (EVT group, 53; No-EVT group, 59) were in the CT-ASPECTS stratum and 71 (EVT group, 40; No-EVT group, 31) in the DWI-ASPECTS stratum. The common odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval) of the EVT group for one scale shift of the mRS score toward 0 was 1.29 (0.65–2.54) compared to the No-EVT group in CT-ASPECTS stratum, and 6.15 (2.46–16.3) in DWI-ASPECTS stratum with significant interaction between treatment assignment and mode of imaging study (P=0.002). There were significant interactions in the improvement of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at 48 hours (CT-ASPECTS stratum: OR, 1.95; DWIASPECTS stratum: OR, 14.5; interaction P=0.035) and mortality at 90 days (CT-ASPECTS stratum: OR, 2.07; DWI-ASPECTS stratum: OR, 0.23; interaction P=0.008).
Conclusion
Patients with ASPECTS of 3–5 on MRI benefitted more from EVT than those with ASPECTS of 3–5 on CT.

Keyword

Acute ischemic stroke; Neuroimaging; Endovascular therapy; Large ischemic core; Large vessel occlusion
Full Text Links
  • JOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2026 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr