Clin Endosc.  2023 Sep;56(5):650-657. 10.5946/ce.2022.190.

Clinical outcomes of permanent stenting with endoscopic ultrasound gallbladder drainage

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, NTT Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology, NTT Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
  • 3Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan

Abstract

Background/Aims
Endoscopic ultrasound gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is gaining attention as a treatment method for cholecystitis. However, only a few studies have assessed the outcomes of permanent stenting with EUS-GBD. Therefore, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of permanent stenting using EUS-GBD.
Methods
This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study. The criteria for EUS-GBD at our institution are a high risk for surgery, inability to perform surgery owing to poor performance status, and inability to obtain consent for emergency surgery. EUS-GBD was performed using a 7-Fr double-pigtail plastic stent with a dilating device. The primary outcomes were the recurrence-free rate of cholecystitis and the late-stage complication-avoidance rate. Secondary outcomes were technical success, clinical success, and procedural adverse events.
Results
A total of 41 patients were included in the analysis. The median follow-up period was 168 (range, 10–1,238) days. The recurrence-free and late-stage complication-avoidance rates during the follow-up period were 95% (38 cases) and 90% (36 cases), respectively. There were only two cases of cholecystitis recurrence during the study period.
Conclusions
EUS-GBD using double-pigtail plastic stent was safe and effective with few complications, even in the long term, in patients with acute cholecystitis.

Keyword

Cholecystitis; Cystic duct, Drainage; Endosonography; Stents

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Among the 73 patients with cholecystitis, 32 patients undergoing BTS were excluded, and 41 patients who met the indication criteria and provided consent underwent permanent stenting. BTS, bridge-to-surgery.

  • Fig. 2. . Endoscopic ultrasound gallbladder drainage procedure images. (A) Endoscopic ultrasound image during gallbladder puncture. (B) Fluoroscopic image of a balloon catheter being dilated. (C) Fluoroscopic image of plastic stent implantation. (D) Endoscopic image of plastic stent implantation.

  • Fig. 3. The horizontal axis presents the number of follow-up days, and the vertical axes present (A) the non-occurrence rate of cholecystitis and (B) the late-stage complication-avoidance rate.

  • Fig. 4. The fistula between the gallbladder (GB) and the duodenum (DU) is shown by the arrow in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy.


Reference

1. Takada T. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: updated Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis/acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018; 25:1–2.
2. Melin MM, Sarr MG, Bender CE, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy: a valuable technique in high-risk patients with presumed acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 1995; 82:1274–1277.
3. Wiersema MJ, Sandusky D, Carr R, et al. Endosonography-guided cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996; 43(2 Pt 1):102–106.
4. Giovannini M, Moutardier V, Pesenti C, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided bilioduodenal anastomosis: a new technique for biliary drainage. Endoscopy. 2001; 33:898–900.
5. Anderloni A, Buda A, Vieceli F, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural stenting for gallbladder drainage in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30:5200–5208.
6. Matsubara S, Isayama H, Nakai Y, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage with a combined internal and external drainage tubes for acute cholecystitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 35:1821–1827.
7. Ryozawa S, Fujita N, Irisawa A, et al. Current status of interventional endoscopic ultrasound. Dig Endosc. 2017; 29:559–566.
8. Dhir V, Isayama H, Itoi T, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary and pancreatic duct interventions. Dig Endosc. 2017; 29:472–485.
9. Lee SS, Park DH, Hwang CY, et al. EUS-guided transmural cholecystostomy as rescue management for acute cholecystitis in elderly or high-risk patients: a prospective feasibility study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 66:1008–1012.
10. Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71:446–454.
11. Perez-Miranda M. Technical considerations in EUS-guided gallbladder drainage. Endosc Ultrasound. 2018; 7:79–82.
12. James TW, Baron TH. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: a review of current practices and procedures. Endosc Ultrasound. 2019; 8(Suppl 1):S28–S34.
Full Text Links
  • CE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr