Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Med Sci.  2023 Aug;38(33):e259. 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e259.

Needs Assessment for the Development of Training Curricula for Internal Medicine Residents

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Medical Education, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
  • 2Department of Medical Education, CHA University School of Medicine, Pocheon, Korea
  • 3Department of Medical Education, Wonkwang University College of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 5Department of Medical Education, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
  • 6Department of Psychiatry, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
  • 7Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea

Abstract

Background
Patient-centered outcomes can be achieved when common core and specialist competencies are achieved in a balanced manner. This study was conducted to assess the need to fill the gap between the defined competencies and learners’ achievement, in order to improve the internal medicine (IM) training education curriculum for promoting patientcentered outcomes.
Methods
A cross-sectional online survey was conducted. The participants were 202 IM specialists who obtained board certification in 2020−2021. We developed a questionnaire to investigate the self-evaluation of common core competencies and achievement level of IM essential competencies. For analysis, frequency tests, paired t-test, Borich priority formula, and χ 2 were performed.
Results
In common core competencies, IM specialists recognized that their achievement levels in all competency categories were lower than their importance level (P < 0.001), and the highest educational demands were related to self-management. They assessed their five essential procedure skill levels as novice or advanced beginner status. The achievement level for the essential symptoms and signs that IM specialists should be able to manage was predominantly competent level. However, on average, 34.9% answered that they had never assessed during training for essential skills, and 29.7% answered the same for essential symptoms and signs.
Conclusion
We identified the priorities of core competencies, the level of achievement in essential procedures and patient care with essential symptoms and signs for IM training, and the related educational methods and assessment status. This study is expected to be used as basic data for developing and revising IM training educational curriculum.

Keyword

Graduate Medical Education; Competency-Based Medical Education; Patient-Centered Outcomes; Needs Assessment; Curriculum Development
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2026 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr