J Korean Soc Radiol.  2023 Jan;84(1):197-211. 10.3348/jksr.2022.0069.

Bare-Metal Stent in Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Access: An Assessment of Circuit Patency according to Access Type and Stent Location

• Lee K
• Won JH
• Kwon Y
• Lee SH
• Bang JB
• Kim J

• KMID: 2539274
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2022.0069

Abstract

Purpose
To evaluate the circuit patency after nitinol bare-metal stent (BMS) placement according to the type of access and location of the stent in dysfunctional hemodialysis access.
Materials and Methods
Between January 2017 and December 2019, 159 patients (mean age, 64.1 ± 13.2 years) underwent nitinol BMS placement for dysfunctional access. The location of stents was as follows: 18 brachiocephalic vein, 51 cephalic arch, 40 upper arm vein, 10 juxta-anastomotic vein, 7 arteriovenous (AV) anastomosis, and 33 graft-vein (GV) anastomosis. Circuit patency was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and cox regression model.
Results
A total of 159 stents were successfully deployed in 103 AV fistula (AVF) and 56 AV graft (AVG). AVG showed lower primary and secondary patency at 12-months compared with AVF (primary patency; 25.0% vs. 44.7%; p = 0.005, secondary patency; 76.8% vs. 92.2%; p = 0.014). Cox regression model demonstrated poorer primary patency at 12 months after stenting in the cephalic arch and GV anastomosis compared with the other sites.
Conclusion
AVF showed better primary and secondary circuit patency at 12 months following the placement of BMS compared with AVG. Stents in the cephalic arch and GV anastomosis were associated with poorer primary patency at 12 months compared to those in other locations.

Keyword

Stent; Angioplasty; Arteriovenous Fistula; Vascular Patency; Renal Dialysis