J Yeungnam Med Sci.  2023 Jan;40(1):96-101. 10.12701/jyms.2022.00234.

The endoscopic transnasal approach to the lesions of the craniocervical junction: two case reports

• Dabboucy B
• Lahiani W
• Bresson D
• Aldahak N

• KMID: 2538791
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.12701/jyms.2022.00234

Abstract

The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) to the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) has recently been considered a safer alternative and less invasive approach than the traditional transoral approach because the complications associated with the latter are avoided or minimized. Here, we present two challenging cases of CVJ pathologies. The first case involved os odontoideum associated with anterior displacement of the occipitocervical junction where the EEA was used, followed by C0-C1-C2 fusion using a posterior approach to decompress the CVJ, and was complicated by rhinorrhea and Candida albicans meningitis. The second case involved basilar invagination with syringomyelia previously treated using a posterior approach, where aggravation of neuropathic symptoms required combined treatment with EEA and occipitocervical fusion of C0-C2-C3-C4, with the postoperative course challenged by operative site infection requiring drainage with debridement and antibiotic therapy. The EEA is an alternative approach for accessing the CVJ in well-selected patients. Knowledge of EEA complications is crucial for the optimal care of patients.

Keyword

Complications; Craniovertebral junction; Disorders; Endoscopic endonasal approach

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. (A) Sagittal, (B) axial T2 magnetic resonance imaging, and (C) sagittal computed tomography scan of the cervical spine show an os odontoideum associated with anterior displacement of the occipitocervical junction resulting in compression of the spinal cord at the level of the odontoid process tip marked by arrows.

• 

  Fig. 2. (A) Sagittal computed tomography scan of the cervical spine performed after the second surgery showed the extent of decompression marked by an arrow; and reduction in displacement with (B) left and (C) right parasagittal views showed occipitocervical fusion of C0-C1-C2 by the posterior approach.

• 

  Fig. 3. (A) Sagittal computed tomography (CT) scan and (B) magnetic resonance imaging of the craniocervical junction show the residual syringomyelic cavity from C4 to T1 with compression of the brainstem by the basilar impression marked by white stars. Postoperative (C) sagittal and (D) axial CT scans show the extent of resection of the C1 anterior arch and odontoid tip marked by an arrow.

• 

  Fig. 4. Intraoperative photographs of the endoscopic approach showing (A) the initial exposure of the C1 anterior arch marked by a black star, (B) drilling of the C1 anterior arch marked by a black star, (C) drilling of the odontoid marked by a black star, and (D) extent of decompression at the end of drilling marked by a black star.

Reference

References

1. Hong JT, Kim IS, Lee HJ, Park JH, Hur JW, Lee JB, et al. Evaluation and surgical planning for craniovertebral junction deformity. Neurospine. 2020; 17:554–67.

2. Frempong-Boadu AK, Faunce WA, Fessler RG. Endoscopically assisted transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery. 2002; 51(5 Suppl):S60–6.

3. Mummaneni PV, Haid RW. Transoral odontoidectomy. Neurosurgery. 2005; 56:1045–50.

4. Shaha AR, Johnson R, Miller J, Milhorat T. Transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the upper cervical vertebrae. Am J Surg. 1993; 166:336–40.

5. Silveira-Bertazzo G, Manjila S, London NR Jr, Prevedello DM. Focused endoscopic endonasal craniocervical junction approach for resection of retro-odontoid lesions: surgical techniques and nuances. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020; 162:1275–80.

6. Grose E, Moldovan ID, Kilty S, Agbi C, Lamothe A, Alkherayf F. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy: a single-center experience. World Neurosurg. 2020; 137:e406–15.

7. Signorelli F, Olivi A, De Giorgio F, Pascali VL, Visocchi M. A 360° approach to the craniovertebral junction in a cadaveric laboratory setting: historical insights, current, and future perspectives in a comparative study. World Neurosurg. 2020; 140:564–73.

8. Visocchi M, Signorelli F, Liao C, Rigante M, Ciappetta P, Barbagallo G, et al. Transoral versus transnasal approach for craniovertebral junction pathologies: which route is better? Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2019; 125:181–6.

9. Crockard HA. Transoral surgery: some lessons learned. Br J Neurosurg. 1995; 9:283–93.

10. Alfieri A, Jho HD, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic endonasal approach to the ventral cranio-cervical junction: anatomical study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002; 144:219–25.

11. Kassam AB, Snyderman C, Gardner P, Carrau R, Spiro R. The expanded endonasal approach: a fully endoscopic transnasal approach and resection of the odontoid process: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2005; 57(1 Suppl):E213.

12. Nayak JV, Gardner PA, Vescan AD, Carrau RL, Kassam AB, Snyderman CH. Experience with the expanded endonasal approach for resection of the odontoid process in rheumatoid disease. Am J Rhinol. 2007; 21:601–6.

13. Shkarubo AN, Chernov I, Andreev DN, Nikolenko VN, Chmutin KG, Sinelnikov MY. Expanded endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy and posterior stabilization: a combined approach. J Neurosurg Sci. 2022; 66:551–9.

14. Yu Y, Wang X, Zhang X, Hu F, Gu Y, Xie T, et al. Endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy to treat basilar invagination with congenital osseous malformations. Eur Spine J. 2013; 22:1127–36.

15. Visocchi M, Iacopino DG, Signorelli F, Olivi A, Maugeri R. Walk the line: the surgical highways to the craniovertebral junction in endoscopic approaches: a historical perspective. World Neurosurg. 2018; 110:544–57.

16. Shriver MF, Kshettry VR, Sindwani R, Woodard T, Benzel EC, Recinos PF. Transoral and transnasal odontoidectomy complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016; 148:121–9.