Ann Rehabil Med.  2022 Aug;46(4):202-208. 10.5535/arm.22063.

Effects of Lymphovenous Anastomosis Surgery Using Ultrasonography in Lymphedema From a Pressure Perspective

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract


Objective
To analyze the effects of lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery after 1 year using the elastic index (EI) and volume.
Methods
This study was a retrospective study of 41 patients, with lymphedema, who underwent LVA surgery between July 2018 and June 2020. Limb circumference, used to determine the volume of the limb with lymphedema, and EI, which reflects tissue stiffness and measured using ultrasonography were measured for each patient before and 1 year after LVA surgery. To examine the effect of LVA, differences in the preoperative and 1-year postoperative volumes and EIs were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results
The mean volume and EI of the dominant site in upper-extremity lymphedema were 2,309.4 cm3 and 1.4, respectively, preoperatively and 2,237.1 cm3 and 0.9, respectively, at 1 year postoperatively. The mean volume and EI difference of the dominant site 1 year after surgery was -16.6 cm3 (p=0.22) and -0.5 (p<0.001). The mean volume and EI of dominant site in lower-extremity lymphedema were 6,137.0 cm3 and 1.2, respectively, preoperatively, and 5,832.6 cm3 and 1.1, respectively, at 1 year postoperatively. The mean volume and EI difference of the dominant site 1 year postoperatively were -320.9 cm3 (p=0.04) and -0.2 (p=0.09), respectively.
Conclusion
LVA surgery is more effective in reducing pressure than in reducing volume, which may be helpful in preventing the progression of lymphedema.

Keyword

Lymphedema; Lymphovenous anastomosis; Elasticity; Pressure; Volume

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Flowchart of study participant recruitment. LVA, lymphovenous anastomosis.


Reference

1. Maclellan RA, Couto RA, Sullivan JE, Grant FD, Slavin SA, Greene AK. Management of primary and secondary lymphedema: analysis of 225 referrals to a center. Ann Plast Surg. 2015; 75:197–200.
2. Park KE, Allam O, Chandler L, Mozzafari MA, Ly C, Lu X, et al. Surgical management of lymphedema: a review of current literature. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:503–11.
Article
3. Venkatramani H, Shanmugakrishnan RR, Kumaran MS, Sabapathy SR. Surgical debulking, lymphatico venous anastomosis, vascularised lymph node transfer in lower limb lymphoedema. Plast Aesthet Res. 2020; 7:19.
Article
4. Forte AJ, Khan N, Huayllani MT, Boczar D, Saleem HY, Lu X, et al. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis for lower extremity lymphedema: a systematic review. Indian J Plast Surg. 2020; 53:17–24.
Article
5. Azhar SH, Lim HY, Tan BK, Angeli V. The unresolved pathophysiology of lymphedema. Front Physiol. 2020; 11:137.
Article
6. Rockson SG. Lymphedema. Am J Med. 2001; 110:288–95.
Article
7. Yodrabum N, Khaogate K, Chaikangwan I, Aojanepong C. Lymphaticovenular anastomosis for patients with lymphedema of the upper extremity at Siriraj Hospital: a quantitative analysis study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2021; 104:620–8.
Article
8. Forte AJ, Huayllani MT, Boczar D, Cinotto G, McLaughlin SA. Ultrasound elastography use in lower extremity lymphedema: a systematic review of the literature. Cureus. 2019; 11:e5578.
Article
9. DeJong HM, Abbott S, Zelesco M, Kennedy BF, Ziman MR, Wood FM. The validity and reliability of using ultrasound elastography to measure cutaneous stiffness, a systematic review. Int J Burns Trauma. 2017; 7:124–41.
10. Suehiro K, Morikage N, Murakami M, Yamashita O, Samura M, Hamano K. Significance of ultrasound examination of skin and subcutaneous tissue in secondary lower extremity lymphedema. Ann Vasc Dis. 2013; 6:180–8.
Article
11. Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, Hall TJ, Bamber JC, Barr RG, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 1: basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015; 41:1126–47.
Article
12. Sigrist RM, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK. Ultrasound elastography: review of techniques and clinical applications. Theranostics. 2017; 7:1303–29.
Article
13. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging. 1991; 13:111–34.
Article
14. Qiu SS, Pruimboom T, Cornelissen AJ, Schols RM, van Kuijk SM, van der Hulst RR. Outcomes following lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) for 100 cases of lymphedema: results over 24-months follow-up. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020; 184:173–83.
Article
15. Hou Y, Zhu QL, Liu H, Jiang YX, Wang L, Xu D, et al. A preliminary study of acoustic radiation force impulse quantification for the assessment of skin in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2015; 42:449–55.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr