J Korean Med Sci.  2022 Aug;37(30):e235. 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e235.

The Risk of Gastrointestinal Cancer on Daily Intake of Low-Dose BaP in C57BL/6 for 60 Days

Affiliations
  • 1School of Public Health, Xinxiang Medical University, Henan, China
  • 2Department of Environmental Technology, Food Technology, and Molecular Technology, Ghent University Global Campus, Incheon, Korea
  • 3Raphagen Co., Ltd. Seoul, Korea
  • 4Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea
  • 5College of Pharmacy, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
  • 6The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical College, Henan, China
  • 7HealingBio Co., Ltd. Cheongju, Korea
  • 8Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) is a carcinogenic compound in contaminated foodstuffs. The effect of oral intake of the environmental carcinogen BaP under low doses and frequent exposure on a digestive system has not been thoroughly verified.
Methods
In this regard, this study was conducted to prove the toxicity effects of BaP on the stomach and colon tissue after exposure to C57BL/6 mouse (3 and 6 µg/kg) following daily oral administration for 60 days. This study investigated acute gastric mucosal injury, severe gastric edema, cell infiltration, and mononuclear cells, multifocal cells, and tumoral inflammatory cells.
Results
The results of ELISA showed that the expression of serum interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α in the BaP exposure group were significantly increased, and a high level of DNA adduct distribution in their stomach and colon. Moreover, this study has confirmed the expression of early carcinogenesis markers: nuclear factor (NF)-κB, p53, IL-6, superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), mucin (MUC1 and MUC2), and β-catenin in the stomach and colon, and showed that there was a significant increase in IL-6, NF-κB, SOD1, β-catenin, and MUC1 (P< 0.05). At the same time, there was a significant decrease in MUC2 and p53 (P < 0.05). Thus, even in low doses, oral intake of BaP can induce DNA damage, increasing the potential risk of gastrointestinal cancer.
Conclusion
This study will provide a scientific basis for researching environmental contaminated food and intestinal health following daily oral administration of BaP.

Keyword

Benzo(a)pyrene; Gastrointestinal Cancer; Oral Intake; Low-Dose; p53; MUC

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Histopathological changes in the stomach and colon of mice after daily oral intake of 3 or 6 µg/kg BaP for 60 days, respectively. No histologic damage in the stomach and colon is observed in mice with vehicle controls. A large number of cell infiltration and inflammatory cells of the stomach, parts of the crypts cells destroyed, and the surface epithelium damaged in the colon are observed following oral intake of 3 µg/kg BaP, respectively. The inflammatory cells are induced by oral intake of 6 µg/kg BaP. The mononuclear cells, and multifocal cells in the stomach and the colon are induced following oral intake of 6 µg/kg BaP, in which the crypts cells destroyed in the colon are observed.BaP = benzo(a)pyrene.

  • Fig. 2 Histologic expression of the antioxidant enzyme, the pro-inflammatory oncogenic cytokine, the tumor transcription factor, and the Wnt signaling cascade regulator of stomach and colon tissues are detected using immunohistochemical stains after daily oral intake of BaP for 60 days. SOD, IL-6, NF-κB, and β-catenin are expressed (yellowish-brown color) in the stomach and colon of mice, respectively.BaP = benzo(a)pyrene, SOD = superoxide dismutase, IL = interleukin, NF = nuclear factor.

  • Fig. 3 Histologic expression of the indicator cancer markers: MUC2, p53, and MUC1 in stomach and colon tissues, are detected by using immunohistochemical stains after daily oral intake of BaP for 60 days. MUC2, p53, and MUC1 in the stomach and colon of mice, respectively.MUC = mucin glycoprotein, BaP = benzo(a)pyrene.

  • Fig. 4 Expression levels of the antioxidant enzyme, the pro-inflammatory oncogenic cytokine, the tumor transcription factor, and the Wnt signaling cascade regulator in the stomach and the colon tissue of mice are induced (n = 8). The stomach and the colon tissue were collected from mice after daily oral intake of BaP for 60 days. (A) Performing western blot analysis of IL-6, NF-κB, SOD1, β-catenin using antibodies and this graph illustrating the changes in the levels of IL-6, NF-κB, SOD1, β-catenin in the stomach were evaluated and compared to oral intake of controls vehicle (Con) and 3 µg/kg BaP (1) or 6 µg/kg BaP (2). (B) Performing western blot analysis of IL-6, NF-κB, SOD1, β-catenin in the colon tissues, and these graphs illustrating the changes in the levels of those were evaluated and compared. The densitometric values were normalized to levels of GAPDH expressed in each group. All data expressed the mean ± standard deviation of eight mice in each group.aCompared to the control mice, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); bCompared to mice between oral intake of 3 µg/kg BaP and 6 µg/kg BaP, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05).BaP = benzo(a)pyrene, IL = interleukin, NF = nuclear factor, SOD = superoxide dismutase, GAPDH = glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

  • Fig. 5 Expression levels of the indicator cancer markers: MUC1, p53, and MUC2 in the stomach and the colon tissue of mice are induced (n = 8). The stomach and the colon tissue were collected from mice after daily oral intake of BaP for 60 days. (A) Performing western blot analysis of MUC1 using antibodies. (B) These graphs illustrate the changes in the levels of MUC1 in the stomach of each group; (C) Performing western blot analysis of p53 using antibodies, and (D) these graphs illustrate the changes in the levels of p53 in the stomach were evaluated and compared to oral intake of controls vehicle (Con) and 3 µg/kg BaP (1) or 6 µg/kg BaP (2). (E) Performing western blot analysis of MUC1, MUC2, and p53 in the colon tissues. (F, G, H) The graphs illustrating the changes in MUC1, MUC2, and p53 levels were evaluated and compared. The densitometric values were normalized to levels of GAPDH expressed in each group. All data expressed the mean ± standard deviation of eight mice in each group.MUC = mucin glycoprotein, BaP = benzo(a)pyrene, GAPDH = glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.aThe difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).


Reference

1. John EM, Stern MC, Sinha R, Koo J. Meat consumption, cooking practices, meat mutagens, and risk of prostate cancer. Nutr Cancer. 2011; 63(4):525–537. PMID: 21526454.
Article
2. Rose M, Holland J, Dowding A, Petch SR, White S, Fernandes A, et al. Investigation into the formation of PAHs in foods prepared in the home to determine the effects of frying, grilling, barbecuing, toasting and roasting. Food Chem Toxicol. 2015; 78:1–9. PMID: 25633345.
Article
3. Lee JG, Lim T, Kim SH, Kang DH, Yoon HJ. Determination and risk characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of tea by using the Margin of Exposure (MOE) approach. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2018; 27(6):1843–1856. PMID: 30483449.
Article
4. Bak Y, Jang HJ, Seo JH, No SH, Chae JI, Hong J, et al. Benzo[a]pyrene alters the expression of genes in A549 lung cancer cells and cancer stem cells. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018; 28(3):425–431. PMID: 29316740.
Article
5. Lee BM, Shim GA. Dietary exposure estimation of benzo[a]pyrene and cancer risk assessment. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2007; 70(15-16):1391–1394. PMID: 17654259.
Article
6. Benford D, Dinovi M, Setzer RW. Application of the margin-of-exposure (MoE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic e.g.: benzo[a]pyrene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010; 48(Suppl 1):S42–S48. PMID: 19818825.
Article
7. Orisakwe OE, Mbagwu HO, Ukpai P, Udowelle NA. Survey of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and lead in Chinese teas sold in Nigeria: levels and health implications. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2015; 66(3):225–232. PMID: 26400118.
8. Chou YC, Lin YH, Lin PH, Tung YC, Ho CT, Pan MH. Dietary 5-demethylnobiletin modulates xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes and ameliorates colon carcinogenesis in benzo[a]pyrene-induced mice. Food Chem Toxicol. 2021; 155:112380. PMID: 34216713.
Article
9. Hakura A, Sonoda J, Tsutsui Y, Mikami T, Imade T, Shimada M, et al. Toxicity profile of benzo[a]pyrene in the male LacZ transgenic mouse (MutaMouse) following oral administration for 5 consecutive days. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1998; 27(3):273–279. PMID: 9693078.
Article
10. Piberger AL, Krüger CT, Strauch BM, Schneider B, Hartwig A. BPDE-induced genotoxicity: relationship between DNA adducts, mutagenicity in the in vitro PIG-A assay, and the transcriptional response to DNA damage in TK6 cells. Arch Toxicol. 2018; 92(1):541–551. PMID: 28593498.
Article
11. Allmann S, Mayer L, Olma J, Kaina B, Hofmann TG, Tomicic MT, et al. Benzo[a]pyrene represses DNA repair through altered E2F1/E2F4 function marking an early event in DNA damage-induced cellular senescence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020; 48(21):12085–12101. PMID: 33166399.
Article
12. Zheng X, Ren J, Peng B, Ye J, Wu X, Zhao W, et al. MALAT1 overexpression promotes the growth of colon cancer by repressing β-catenin degradation. Cell Signal. 2020; 73:109676. PMID: 32485228.
Article
13. Kim S, Jeong S. Mutation hotspots in the β-catenin gene: Lessons from the human cancer genome databases. Mol Cells. 2019; 42(1):8–16. PMID: 30699286.
14. Zheng Z, Park SY, Lee M, Phark S, Won NH, Kang HS, et al. Effects of benzo(a)pyrene on the expression of heat shock proteins, pro-inflammatory cytokines and antioxidant enzymes in hepatic tumors induced by rat hepatoma N1-S1 cells. J Korean Med Sci. 2011; 26(2):222–230. PMID: 21286013.
Article
15. Shukla S, Srivastava JK, Shankar E, Kanwal R, Nawab A, Sharma H, et al. Oxidative stress and antioxidant status in high-risk prostate cancer subjects. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020; 10(3):E126. PMID: 32120827.
Article
16. Zhou Q, Tian W, Jiang Z, Huang T, Ge C, Liu T, et al. A Positive feedback loop of AKR1C3-mediated activation of NF-kappaB and STAT3 facilitates proliferation and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2021; 81(5):1361–1374. PMID: 33361392.
Article
17. Butt J, Blot WJ, Visvanathan K, Le Marchand L, Wilkens LR, Chen Y, et al. Auto-antibodies to p53 and the subsequent development of colorectal cancer in a U.S. prospective cohort consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020; 29(12):2729–2734. PMID: 32972968.
Article
18. Choi EK, Park EJ, Phan TT, Kim HD, Hoe KL, Kim DU. Econazole induces p53-dependent apoptosis and decreases metastasis ability in gastric cancer cells. Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2020; 28(4):370–379. PMID: 32209732.
Article
19. Tang D, Yue L, Yao R, Zhou L, Yang Y, Lu L, et al. P53 prevent tumor invasion and metastasis by down-regulating IDO in lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(33):54548–54557. PMID: 28903363.
Article
20. Nakayama M, Oshima M. Mutant p53 in colon cancer. J Mol Cell Biol. 2019; 11(4):267–276. PMID: 30496442.
Article
21. Farombi EO, Ajayi BO, Adedara IA. 6-Gingerol delays tumorigenesis in benzo[a]pyrene and dextran sulphate sodium-induced colorectal cancer in mice. Food Chem Toxicol. 2020; 142:111483. PMID: 32512025.
Article
22. Kim DH, Yong HJ, Mander S, Nguyen HT, Nguyen LP, Park HK, et al. SP-8356, a (1S)-(-)-verbenone derivative, inhibits the growth and motility of liver cancer cells by regulating NF-κB and ERK signaling. Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2021; 29(3):331–341. PMID: 33455945.
Article
23. Jang J, Song J, Sim I, Yoon Y. Wnt-C59 inhibits proinflammatory cytokine expression by reducing the interaction between β-catenin and NF-κB in LPS-stimulated epithelial and macrophage cells. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2021; 25(4):307–319. PMID: 34193644.
Article
24. Astashchanka A, Shroka TM, Jacobsen BM. Mucin 2 (MUC2) modulates the aggressiveness of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019; 173(2):289–299. PMID: 30317423.
Article
25. Lee HK, Kwon MJ, Seo J, Kim JW, Hong M, Park HR, et al. Expression of mucins (MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC6) in ALK-positive lung cancer: Comparison with EGFR-mutated lung cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 2019; 215(3):459–465. PMID: 30580903.
Article
26. Pope JL, Bhat AA, Sharma A, Ahmad R, Krishnan M, Washington MK, et al. Claudin-1 regulates intestinal epithelial homeostasis through the modulation of Notch-signalling. Gut. 2014; 63(4):622–634. PMID: 23766441.
Article
27. Pourjafar M, Samadi P, Saidijam M. MUC1 antibody-based therapeutics: the promise of cancer immunotherapy. Immunotherapy. 2020; 12(17):1269–1286. PMID: 33019839.
Article
28. Jeong SJ, Kim JH, Lim BJ, Yoon I, Song JA, Moon HS, et al. Inhibition of MUC1 biosynthesis via threonyl-tRNA synthetase suppresses pancreatic cancer cell migration. Exp Mol Med. 2018; 50(1):e424. PMID: 29328069.
Article
29. Yang J. Identification of novel biomarkers, MUC5AC, MUC1, KRT7, GAPDH, CD44 for gastric cancer. Med Oncol. 2020; 37(5):34. PMID: 32219571.
Article
30. Ge Y, Ma G, Liu H, Lin Y, Zhang G, Du M, et al. MUC1 is associated with TFF2 methylation in gastric cancer. Clin Epigenetics. 2020; 12(1):37. PMID: 32122390.
Article
31. Szlendak M, Sitarz R, Berbecka M, Mielko J, Morsink F, Maciejewski R, et al. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and mucin 1 in colorectal cancer. Mol Clin Oncol. 2020; 13(5):52. PMID: 32874582.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr