Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2020 Jan;63(1):19-26. 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.1.19.

Treatment of gestational diabetes diagnosed by the IADPSG criteria decreases excessive fetal growth

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea.
  • 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
  • 5Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
  • 6Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MizMedi Hospital, Seoul, Korea. obdrmhk@naver.com

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
We evaluated the effect on treatment using the new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis.
METHODS
Singleton pregnant women whose plasma glucose levels were ≥140 mg/dL on the 50 g glucose challenge test (GCT) underwent 75 g oral glucose tolerance for GDM diagnosis. During the first half of the study period, GDM was diagnosed using 2 abnormal values by Carpenter-Coustan (C-C) criteria. In the second half of the study period, 1 or more abnormal values by IADPSG criteria were used for GDM diagnosis. Pregnant women were classified into 5 groups: normal 50 g GCT, positive 50 g GCT but non-GDM, GDM by IADPSG criteria and non-treated, GDM by IADPSG criteria and treated, GDM by C-C criteria and treated. The odds ratios (ORs) for large for gestational age (LGA) and macrosomia were analyzed.
RESULTS
Of the 2,678 patients, the frequency of GDM diagnosed by C-C and IADPSG criteria was 2.6% and 7.5%. ORs (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for LGA and macrosomia in the group with GDM by IADPSG criteria and non-treated were 2.81 (95% CI, 1.47-5.38) and 2.84 (95% CI, 1.08-7.47). The risk of LGA and macrosomia did not increase in the group with GDM by IADPSG criteria and treated.
CONCLUSION
The risk of LGA and macrosomia for mild GDM diagnosed solely by IADPSG criteria depends on whether they are treated or not. Treatment of GDM based on IADPSG criteria reduces the risk of excessive fetal growth. Trial Registration Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0000776

Keyword

Gestational diabetes; Criteria; Treatment

MeSH Terms

Blood Glucose
Diabetes, Gestational*
Diagnosis
Female
Fetal Development*
Gestational Age
Glucose
Glucose Tolerance Test
Humans
Information Services
Odds Ratio
Pregnancy
Pregnant Women
Glucose

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Enrollment of study population.GCT, glucose challenge test; C-C, Carpenter-Coustan; IADPSG, International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus.


Cited by  4 articles

Gestational weight gain in twin pregnancies in Korea: application of the 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations
Bo Young Choi, Subeen Hong, Minhee Jeon, Jee Yoon Park, Kyung Joon Oh, Joon-Seok Hong
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020;63(6):690-699.    doi: 10.5468/ogs.20133.

A model for predicting gestational diabetes mellitus in early pregnancy: a prospective study in Thailand
Sattamat Lappharat, Penkae Rothmanee, Kasemsak Jandee, Manaphat Suksai, Tippawan Liabsuetrakul
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022;65(2):156-165.    doi: 10.5468/ogs.21250.

Pre-COVID and COVID experience of objective structured clinical examination as a learning tool for post-graduate residents in Obstetrics & Gynecology-a quality improvement study
Charu Sharma, Pratibha Singh, Shashank Shekhar, Abhishek Bhardwaj, Manisha Jhirwal, Navdeep Kaur Ghuman, Meenakshi Gothwal, Garima Yadav, Priyanka Kathuria, Vibha Mishra
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023;66(4):316-326.    doi: 10.5468/ogs.22266.

Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes According to the Majority of Physicians: Obstetrics Versus Endocrinology
Haemin Kim, Hyun-Hwa Cha, Won Joon Seong
J Korean Soc Matern Child Health. 2023;27(3):167-172.    doi: 10.21896/jksmch.2023.27.3.167.


Reference

1. O'Sullivan JB, Mahan CM. Criteria for the oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy. Diabetes. 1964; 13:278–285. PMID: 14166677.
2. Agarwal MM. Gestational diabetes mellitus: an update on the current international diagnostic criteria. World J Diabetes. 2015; 6:782–791. PMID: 26131321.
Article
3. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358:1991–2002. PMID: 18463375.
Article
4. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33:676–682. PMID: 20190296.
Article
5. Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy: a World Health Organization Guideline. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014; 103:341–363. PMID: 24847517.
6. Basevi V, Di Mario S, Morciano C, Nonino F, Magrini N. Comment on: American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2011. Diabetes Care 2011;34(Suppl. 1):S11-S61. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34:e53. PMID: 21525493.
Article
7. Committee on Practice Bulletins--Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 137: Gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122:406–416. PMID: 23969827.
8. Kgosidialwa O, Egan AM, Carmody L, Kirwan B, Gunning P, Dunne FP. Treatment with diet and exercise for women with gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed using IADPSG criteria. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015; 100:4629–4636. PMID: 26495752.
Article
9. Bogdanet D, Egan AM, Reddin C, Kgosidialwa O, Kirwan B, Carmody L, et al. ATLANTIC DIP: insulin therapy for women with IADPSG-diagnosed gestational diabetes mellitus. Does it work? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017; 102:849–857. PMID: 27901638.
Article
10. Wu ET, Nien FJ, Kuo CH, Chen SC, Chen KY, Chuang LM, et al. Diagnosis of more gestational diabetes lead to better pregnancy outcomes: comparing the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group criteria, and the Carpenter and Coustan criteria. J Diabetes Investig. 2016; 7:121–126.
Article
11. Maryns AS, Dehaene I, Page G. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in a treated versus non-treated cohort of women with gestational diabetes mellitus according to the HAPO 5 and 4 criteria. Facts Views Vis ObGyn. 2017; 9:133–140. PMID: 29479398.
12. Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 144:768–773. PMID: 7148898.
Article
13. Lee JJ. Birth weight for gestational age patterns by sex, plurality, and parity in Korean population. Korean J Pediatr. 2007; 50:732–739.
Article
14. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, McPhee AJ, Jeffries WS, Robinson JS, et al. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352:2477–2486. PMID: 15951574.
Article
15. Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, Carpenter MW, Ramin SM, Casey B, et al. A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:1339–1348. PMID: 19797280.
Article
16. Ethridge JK Jr, Catalano PM, Waters TP. Perinatal outcomes associated with the diagnosis of gestational diabetes made by the international association of the diabetes and pregnancy study groups criteria. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124:571–578. PMID: 25162258.
Article
17. Duran A, Sáenz S, Torrejón MJ, Bordiú E, Del Valle L, Galindo M, et al. Introduction of IADPSG criteria for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus results in improved pregnancy outcomes at a lower cost in a large cohort of pregnant women: the St. Carlos Gestational Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37:2442–2450. PMID: 24947793.
Article
18. Wei Y, Yang H, Zhu W, Yang H, Li H, Yan J, et al. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group criteria is suitable for gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis: further evidence from China. Chin Med J (Engl). 2014; 127:3553–3556. PMID: 25316228.
19. Feldman RK, Tieu RS, Yasumura L. Gestational diabetes screening: the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups compared with carpenter-coustan screening. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 127:10–17. PMID: 26646142.
20. Werner EF, Pettker CM, Zuckerwise L, Reel M, Funai EF, Henderson J, et al. Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: are the criteria proposed by the international association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups cost-effective? Diabetes Care. 2012; 35:529–535. PMID: 22266735.
Article
21. Lee JH, Lee HJ, Lee JG, Hwang JH, Kim SR, Kim KT, et al. A comparison of criteria of gestational diabetes using 100 gm oral glucose tolerance test in Korean women. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 48:2570–2577.
22. Yang SC, Kim HS, Yang JI, Lee HJ, Ahn ST, Seo SS, et al. Study of the diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 45:1932–1939.
Full Text Links
  • OGS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr