Clin Orthop Surg.  2019 Dec;11(4):427-435. 10.4055/cios.2019.11.4.427.

Is Acromial Fracture after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty a Negligible Complication?: A Systematic Review

• Cho CH
• Jung JW
• Na SS
• Bae KC
• Lee KJ
• Kim DH

• KMID: 2462537
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.4.427

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of acromial fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and clinical and radiological outcomes of treatment of the fracture.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed to identify studies that reported the results of treatment of acromial fractures after RTSA. A literature search was conducted by two investigators using four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Ovid Medline).
RESULTS
Fifteen studies (2,857 shoulders) satisfied our inclusion criteria. The incidence of acromial fracture after RTSA was 4.0% (114 / 2,857). The mean age of the patients at the time of fracture was 72.9 years (range, 51 to 91 years). The mean time from RTSA to diagnosis of acromial fracture was 9.4 months (range, 1 to 94 months). One hundred shoulders (87.7%) were treated conservatively and 14 shoulders (12.3%) were treated surgically. The mean follow-up period after acromial fracture was 33.8 months. The overall union rate was 50.0% (43.8% for conservative treatment and 87.5% for operative treatment). The fracture incidence was significantly different among the medial glenoid and medial humerus prosthesis design (8.4%), the lateral glenoid and medial humerus design (4.0%), and the medial glenoid and lateral humerus design (2.8%). The mean values at final follow-up were as follows: visual analog scale score, 2.2; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 59.1; Constant score, 59.7; and Simple Shoulder Test, 5.8. The mean forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation were 102.3°, 92.3°, and 25.8°, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Acromial fractures after RTSA are a complication neither uncommon nor negligible. In the absence of studies with high-level evidence, there is a controversy on the outcomes after treatment. Further well-designed prospective randomized controlled studies with a long-term follow-up should be performed to ascertain the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of acromial fractures after RTSA.

Keyword

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Acromion; Scapular; Fracture; Systematic review

MeSH Terms

Acromion
Arthroplasty*
Diagnosis
Elbow
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Humerus
Incidence
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Research Personnel
Shoulder*
Surgeons
Visual Analog Scale

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Flow diagram for the systematic review process.

Reference

1. Grammont PM, Baulot E. Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. Orthopedics. 1993; 16(1):65–68. PMID: 8421661.

2. Boileau P, Watkinson DJ, Hatzidakis AM, Balg F. Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14(1 Suppl S):147S–161S. PMID: 15726075.

3. Shafritz AB, Flieger S. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: early results of forty-one cases and a review of the literature. Hand Clin. 2012; 28(4):469–479. PMID: 23101597.

4. Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA Jr. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(10):2279–2292. PMID: 17015609.

5. Saltzman BM, Chalmers PN, Gupta AK, Romeo AA, Nicholson GP. Complication rates comparing primary with revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(11):1647–1654. PMID: 24986694.

6. Dubrow S, Streit JJ, Muh S, Shishani Y, Gobezie R. Acromial stress fractures: correlation with acromioclavicular osteoarthritis and acromiohumeral distance. Orthopedics. 2014; 37(12):e1074–e1079. PMID: 25437081.

7. Gillespie RJ, Garrigues GE, Chang ES, Namdari S, Williams GR Jr. Surgical exposure for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: differences in approaches and outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am. 2015; 46(1):49–56. PMID: 25435034.

8. Hamid N, Connor PM, Fleischli JF, D'Alessandro DF. Acromial fracture after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2011; 40(7):E125–E129. PMID: 22013577.

9. Hattrup SJ. The influence of postoperative acromial and scapular spine fractures on the results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2010; 33(5):302.

10. Hattrup SJ, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Reverse shoulder replacement for patients with inflammatory arthritis. J Hand Surg Am. 2012; 37(9):1888–1894. PMID: 22749484.

11. Hess F, Zettl R, Smolen D, Knoth C. Anatomical reconstruction to treat acromion fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2018; 42(4):875–881. PMID: 29222664.

12. Kennon JC, Lu C, McGee-Lawrence ME, Crosby LA. Scapula fracture incidence in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using screws above or below metaglene central cage: clinical and biomechanical outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 26(6):1023–1030. PMID: 28131691.

13. Ladermann A, Williams MD, Melis B, Hoffmeyer P, Walch G. Objective evaluation of lengthening in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18(4):588–595. PMID: 19481476.

14. Levy JC, Anderson C, Samson A. Classification of postoperative acromial fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95(15):e104. PMID: 23925750.

15. Lopiz Y, Rodriguez-Gonzalez A, Garcia-Fernandez C, Marco F. Scapula insufficiency fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff arthropathy: what is their functional impact? Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2015; 59(5):318–325. PMID: 25818527.

16. Mulieri P, Dunning P, Klein S, Pupello D, Frankle M. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tear without glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(15):2544–2556. PMID: 21048173.

17. Stephens SP, Paisley KC, Giveans MR, Wirth MA. The effect of proximal humeral bone loss on revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24(10):1519–1526. PMID: 25861853.

18. Teusink MJ, Otto RJ, Cottrell BJ, Frankle MA. What is the effect of postoperative scapular fracture on outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(6):782–790. PMID: 24325986.

19. Wahlquist TC, Hunt AF, Braman JP. Acromial base fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: report of five cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20(7):1178–1183. PMID: 21493106.

20. Walch G, Mottier F, Wall B, Boileau P, Mole D, Favard L. Acromial insufficiency in reverse shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18(3):495–502. PMID: 19250846.

21. Crosby LA, Hamilton A, Twiss T. Scapula fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: classification and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(9):2544–2549. PMID: 21448773.

22. Otto RJ, Virani NA, Levy JC, Nigro PT, Cuff DJ, Frankle MA. Scapular fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: evaluation of risk factors and the reliability of a proposed classification. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22(11):1514–1521. PMID: 23659805.

23. Mayne IP, Bell SN, Wright W, Coghlan JA. Acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder Elbow. 2016; 8(2):90–100. PMID: 27583005.

24. Giles JW, Langohr GD, Johnson JA, Athwal GS. Implant design variations in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty influence the required deltoid force and resultant joint load. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473(11):3615–3626. PMID: 26310680.