Cancer Res Treat.  2019 Jul;51(3):973-981. 10.4143/crt.2018.360.

Improved Survival of Cancer Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit between 2002 and 2011 at a U.S. Teaching Hospital

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • 2MIT Critical Data, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. lceli@mit.edu
  • 3Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • 4Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • 5Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Cancer patients are at increased risk of treatment- or disease-related admission to the intensive care unit. Over the past decades, both critical care and cancer care have improved substantially. Due to increased cancer-specific survival, we hypothesized that the number of cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and survival have increased.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
MIMIC-III was used to study trends and outcomes of cancer patients admitted to the ICU between 2002 and 2011. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for confounders of mortality.
RESULTS
Among 41,468 patients analyzed, 1,083 were hemato-oncologic, 4,330 were oncologic and 66 patients had both a hematological and solid malignancy. Admission numbers more than doubled and the proportion of cancer patients in the ICU increased steadily from 2002 to 2011. In both the univariate and multivariate analyses, solid cancers and hematologic cancers were strongly associated with 28-day mortality. This association was even stronger for 1-year mortality, with odds ratios of 4.02 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.69 to 4.38) and 2.25 (95% CI, 1.93 to 2.62), respectively. Over the 10-year study period, both 28-day and 1-year mortality decreased, with hematologic patients showing the strongest annual adjusted decrease in the odds of death. There was considerable heterogeneity among solid cancer types.
CONCLUSION
Between 2002 and 2011, the number of cancer patients admitted to the ICU more than doubled, while clinical severity scores remained overall unchanged, suggesting improved treatment. Although cancer patients had higher mortality rates, both 28-day and 1-year mortality of hematologic patients decreased faster than that of non-cancer patients, while mortality rates of cancer patients strongly depended on cancer type.

Keyword

Critical care; Intensive care units; Neoplasms; Hematology; Oncology; Trends; Survival

MeSH Terms

Critical Care*
Hematology
Hospitals, Teaching*
Humans
Intensive Care Units*
Logistic Models
Mortality
Multivariate Analysis
Odds Ratio
Population Characteristics

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Changes in overall and cancer-type specific admission to the intensive care unit between 2002 and 2011. Both the proportion and absolute number of cancer patients increased over time. While there are annual fluctuations, proportions by cancer type remain overall similar.

  • Fig. 2. Changes in unadjusted 28-day mortality (A) and unadjusted 1-year mortality (B) over the 10-year period. There are notable differences in mortality between the subgroups, with cancers of the oral cavity/lip/pharynx and other primary origin having the highest mortality rates. Genitourinary (GU) and breast/connective tissue cancers had the lowest mortality rates. Overall, most cancer types show a decrease in mortality rates over time. GI, gastrointestinal cancer; Oral cancer, cancer of the oral cavity/lip/pharynx.


Reference

References

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017; 67:7–30.
Article
2. Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Kramer JL, Rowland JH, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016; 66:271–89.
Article
3. Jemal A, Ward EM, Johnson CJ, Cronin KA, Ma J, Ryerson B, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2014, featuring survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017; 109:djx030.
Article
4. Bos MM, Verburg IW, Dumaij I, Stouthard J, Nortier JW, Richel D, et al. Intensive care admission of cancer patients: a comparative analysis. Cancer Med. 2015; 4:966–76.
Article
5. Ostermann M, Ferrando-Vivas P, Gore C, Power S, Harrison D. Characteristics and outcome of cancer patients sdmitted to the ICU in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland and national trends between 1997 and 2013. Crit Care Med. 2017; 45:1668–76.
6. van Vliet M, Verburg IW, van den Boogaard M, de Keizer NF, Peek N, Blijlevens NM, et al. Trends in admission prevalence, illness severity and survival of haematological patients treated in Dutch intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 2014; 40:1275–84.
Article
7. Bos MM, de Keizer NF, Meynaar IA, Bakhshi-Raiez F, de Jonge E. Outcomes of cancer patients after unplanned admission to general intensive care units. Acta Oncol. 2012; 51:897–905.
Article
8. Wallace SK, Rathi NK, Waller DK, Ensor JE Jr, Haque SA, Price KJ, et al. Two decades of ICU utilization and hospital outcomes in a comprehensive cancer center. Crit Care Med. 2016; 44:926–33.
Article
9. Johnson AE, Pollard TJ, Shen L, Lehman LW, Feng M, Ghassemi M, et al. MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database. Sci Data. 2016; 3:160035.
Article
10. Johnson AE, Stone DJ, Celi LA, Pollard TJ. The MIMIC Code Repository: enabling reproducibility in critical care research. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018; 25:32–9.
Article
11. Moore BJ, White S, Washington R, Coenen N, Elixhauser A. Identifying increased risk of readmission and in-hospital mortality using hospital administrative data: the AHRQ Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Med Care. 2017; 55:698–705.
12. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996; 22:707–10.
13. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Zimmerman JE, Bergner M, Bastos PG, et al. The APACHE III prognostic system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest. 1991; 100:1619–36.
14. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29:1303–10.
Article
15. Druker BJ, Sawyers CL, Kantarjian H, Resta DJ, Reese SF, Ford JM, et al. Activity of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in the blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Philadelphia chromosome. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344:1038–42.
Article
16. Kox M, Pickkers P. "Less is more" in critically ill patients: not too intensive. JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173:1369–72.
17. Soares M, Caruso P, Silva E, Teles JM, Lobo SM, Friedman G, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer requiring admission to intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study. Crit Care Med. 2010; 38:9–15.
Article
18. Rosolem MM, Rabello LS, Lisboa T, Caruso P, Costa RT, Leal JV, et al. Critically ill patients with cancer and sepsis: clinical course and prognostic factors. J Crit Care. 2012; 27:301–7.
Article
19. Soares M, Salluh JI, Toscano L, Dias FL. Outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with head and neck cancer and severe acute illnesses. Intensive Care Med. 2007; 33:2009–13.
Article
20. Demandt AMP, Geerse DA, Janssen BJ, Winkens B, Schouten HC, van Mook WN. The prognostic value of a trend in modified SOFA score for patients with hematological malignancies in the intensive care unit. Eur J Haematol. 2017; 99:315–22.
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr