Korean Circ J.  2019 Jun;49(6):469-484. 10.4070/kcj.2019.0136.

Sacubitril/Valsartan in Asian Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Affiliations
  • 1British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. john.mcmurray@glasgow.ac.uk

Abstract

The Prospective comparison of Angiotensin Receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) with Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure (HF) trial (PARADIGM-HF) showed that adding a neprilysin inhibitor (sacubitril) to a renin-angiotensin system blocker (and other standard therapy) reduced morbidity and mortality in ambulatory patients with chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In PARADIGM-HF, valsartan combined with sacubitril (a so-called ARNI) was superior to the current gold standard of an ACEI, specifically enalapril, reducing the risk of the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death or first HF hospitalization by 20% and all-cause death by 16%. Following the results of PARADIGM-HF, sacubitril/valsartan was approved by American and European regulatory authorities for the treatment of HFrEF. The burden of HF in Asia is substantial, both due to the huge population of the region and as a result of increasing CV risk factors and disease. Both the prevalence and mortality associated with HF are high in Asia. In the following review, we discuss the development of sacubitril/valsartan, the prototype ARNI, and the available evidence for its efficacy and safety in Asian patients with HFrEF.

Keyword

Asians; Sacubitril/valsartan; Heart failure

MeSH Terms

Angiotensins
Asia
Asian Continental Ancestry Group*
Enalapril
Heart Failure*
Heart*
Hospitalization
Humans
Mortality
Neprilysin
Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A
Prevalence
Prospective Studies
Renin-Angiotensin System
Risk Factors
Valsartan
Angiotensins
Enalapril
Neprilysin
Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A
Valsartan

Figure

  • Figure 1 Number of patients of Asian patients by region enrolled in PARADIGM-HF (Asian race only). PARADIGM-HF = Prospective comparison of Angiotensin Receptor-neprilysin inhibitor with Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure trial.

  • Figure 2 Event rates per 100 patient years by treatment in all patients and by Asian regions enrolled in PARADIGM-HF. HF = heart failure; PARADIGM-HF = Prospective comparison of Angiotensin Receptor-neprilysin inhibitor with Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure trial.

  • Figure 3 Treatment effects by Asian regions in PARADIGM-HF. CI = confidence interval; PARADIGM-HF = Prospective comparison of Angiotensin Receptor-neprilysin inhibitor with Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure trial. *Interaction p value for Asia subgroups.


Cited by  1 articles

Economic Burden of Heart Failure in Asian Countries Based on Real-world Data
Hyemoon Chung, Il Suk Sohn
Korean Circ J. 2021;51(8):694-695.    doi: 10.4070/kcj.2021.0197.


Reference

1. Savarese G, Lund LH. Global public health burden of heart failure. Card Fail Rev. 2017; 3:7–11.
Article
2. Lam CS, Teng TK, Tay WT, et al. Regional and ethnic differences among patients with heart failure in Asia: the Asian sudden cardiac death in heart failure registry. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37:3141–3153.
Article
3. Dokainish H, Teo K, Zhu J, et al. Global mortality variations in patients with heart failure: results from the International Congestive Heart Failure (INTER-CHF) prospective cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2017; 5:e665–72.
4. Dewan P, Jhund PS, Shen L, et al. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: comparison of patient characteristics and clinical outcomes within Asia and between Asia, Europe and the Americas. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019; 21:577–587.
Article
5. Reyes EB, Ha JW, Firdaus I, et al. Heart failure across Asia: same healthcare burden but differences in organization of care. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 223:163–167.
Article
6. Teng TK, Tromp J, Tay WT, et al. Prescribing patterns of evidence-based heart failure pharmacotherapy and outcomes in the ASIAN-HF registry: a cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2018; 6:e1008–18.
Article
7. Hasan MS, Basri HB, Hin LP, Stanslas J. Genetic polymorphisms and drug interactions leading to clopidogrel resistance: why the Asian population requires special attention. Int J Neurosci. 2013; 123:143–154.
Article
8. McMurray JJ, Packer M, Desai AS, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371:993–1004.
Article
9. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart failure society of America. Circulation. 2017; 136:e137–e161.
Article
10. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37:2129–2200.
11. de Bold AJ, Borenstein HB, Veress AT, Sonnenberg H. A rapid and potent natriuretic response to intravenous injection of atrial myocardial extract in rats. Life Sci. 1981; 28:89–94.
Article
12. Daniels LB, Maisel AS. Natriuretic peptides. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50:2357–2368.
Article
13. O'Connor CM, Starling RC, Hernandez AF, et al. Effect of nesiritide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365:32–43.
14. Packer M, O'Connor C, McMurray JJ, et al. Effect of ularitide on cardiovascular mortality in acute heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376:1956–1964.
Article
15. Potter LR. Natriuretic peptide metabolism, clearance and degradation. FEBS J. 2011; 278:1808–1817.
Article
16. Kerr MA, Kenny AJ. The purification and specificity of a neutral endopeptidase from rabbit kidney brush border. Biochem J. 1974; 137:477–488.
Article
17. Bayes-Genis A, Barallat J, Richards AM. A test in context: neprilysin: function, inhibition, and biomarker. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68:639–653.
18. McKinnie SM, Fischer C, Tran KM, et al. The metalloprotease neprilysin degrades and inactivates apelin peptides. ChemBioChem. 2016; 17:1495–1498.
Article
19. Roques BP, Fournié-Zaluski MC, Soroca E, et al. The enkephalinase inhibitor thiorphan shows antinociceptive activity in mice. Nature. 1980; 288:286–288.
Article
20. Shepperson NB, Barclay PL, Bennett JA, Samuels GM. Inhibition of neutral endopeptidase (EC 3.4.24.11) leads to an atrial natriuretic factor-mediated natriuretic, diuretic and antihypertensive response in rodents. Clin Sci (Lond). 1991; 80:265–269.
Article
21. Kahn JC, Patey M, Dubois-Rande JL, et al. Effect of sinorphan on plasma atrial natriuretic factor in congestive heart failure. Lancet. 1990; 335:118–119.
Article
22. Gros C, Souque A, Schwartz JC, et al. Protection of atrial natriuretic factor against degradation: diuretic and natriuretic responses after in vivo inhibition of enkephalinase (EC 3.4.24.11) by acetorphan. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989; 86:7580–7584.
Article
23. Northridge DB, Jardine AG, Alabaster CT, et al. Effects of UK 69 578: a novel atriopeptidase inhibitor. Lancet. 1989; 2:591–593.
Article
24. Northridge DB, Newby DE, Rooney E, Norrie J, Dargie HJ. Comparison of the short-term effects of candoxatril, an orally active neutral endopeptidase inhibitor, and frusemide in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure. Am Heart J. 1999; 138:1149–1157.
Article
25. Bevan EG, Connell JM, Doyle J, et al. Candoxatril, a neutral endopeptidase inhibitor: efficacy and tolerability in essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1992; 10:607–613.
26. Ferro CJ, Spratt JC, Haynes WG, Webb DJ. Inhibition of neutral endopeptidase causes vasoconstriction of human resistance vessels in vivo. Circulation. 1998; 97:2323–2330.
Article
27. Dalzell JR, Seed A, Berry C, et al. Effects of neutral endopeptidase (neprilysin) inhibition on the response to other vasoactive peptides in small human resistance arteries: studies with thiorphan and omapatrilat. Cardiovasc Ther. 2014; 32:13–18.
Article
28. Robl JA, Sun CQ, Stevenson J, et al. Dual metalloprotease inhibitors: mercaptoacetyl-based fused heterocyclic dipeptide mimetics as inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase. J Med Chem. 1997; 40:1570–1577.
Article
29. Rouleau JL, Pfeffer MA, Stewart DJ, et al. Comparison of vasopeptidase inhibitor, omapatrilat, and lisinopril on exercise tolerance and morbidity in patients with heart failure: IMPRESS randomised trial. Lancet. 2000; 356:615–620.
Article
30. Packer M, Califf RM, Konstam MA, et al. Comparison of omapatrilat and enalapril in patients with chronic heart failure: the Omapatrilat Versus Enalapril Randomized Trial of Utility in Reducing Events (OVERTURE). Circulation. 2002; 106:920–926.
31. Kostis JB, Packer M, Black HR, Schmieder R, Henry D, Levy E. Omapatrilat and enalapril in patients with hypertension: the Omapatrilat Cardiovascular Treatment vs. Enalapril (OCTAVE) trial. Am J Hypertens. 2004; 17:103–111.
Article
32. Fryer RM, Segreti J, Banfor PN, et al. Effect of bradykinin metabolism inhibitors on evoked hypotension in rats: rank efficacy of enzymes associated with bradykinin-mediated angioedema. Br J Pharmacol. 2008; 153:947–955.
Article
33. Feng L, Karpinski PH, Sutton P, et al. LCZ696: a dual-acting sodium supramolecular complex. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012; 53:275–276.
Article
34. Ayalasomayajula S, Langenickel T, Pal P, Boggarapu S, Sunkara G. Clinical pharmacokinetics of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696): a novel angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017; 56:1461–1478.
Article
35. Cada DJ, Baker DE, Leonard J. Sacubitril/valsartan. Hosp Pharm. 2015; 50:1025–1036.
Article
36. Cohn JN, Tognoni G. Valsartan Heart Failure Trial Investigators. A randomized trial of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345:1667–1675.
Article
37. Gu J, Noe A, Chandra P, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of LCZ696, a novel dual-acting angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi). J Clin Pharmacol. 2010; 50:401–414.
Article
38. Yusuf S, Pitt B, Davis CE, Hood WB, Cohn JN. SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325:293–302.
Article
39. Desai AS, McMurray JJ, Packer M, et al. Effect of the angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 compared with enalapril on mode of death in heart failure patients. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36:1990–1997.
Article
40. Jhund PS, Fu M, Bayram E, et al. Efficacy and safety of LCZ696 (sacubitril-valsartan) according to age: insights from PARADIGM-HF. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36:2576–2584.
Article
41. Kristensen SL, Martinez F, Jhund PS, et al. Geographic variations in the PARADIGM-HF heart failure trial. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37:3167–3174.
Article
42. Okumura N, Jhund PS, Gong J, et al. Effects of sacubitril/valsartan in the PARADIGM-HF trial (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) according to background therapy. Circ Hear Fail. 2016; 9:e003212.
Article
43. Cannon JA, Shen L, Jhund PS, et al. Dementia-related adverse events in PARADIGM-HF and other trials in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017; 19:129–137.
44. Pocock SJ, McMurray JJ, Collier TJ. Making sense of statistics in clinical trial reports: part 1 of a 4-part series on statistics for clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66:2536–2549.
45. Solomon SD, Claggett B, McMurray JJ, Hernandez AF, Fonarow GC. Combined neprilysin and renin-angiotensin system inhibition in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016; 18:1238–1243.
Article
46. Senni M, McMurray JJ, Wachter R, et al. Initiating sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in heart failure: results of TITRATION, a double-blind, randomized comparison of two uptitration regimens. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016; 18:1193–1202.
Article
47. Wachter R, Senni M, Belohlavek J, Butylin D, Noe A, Pascual-Figal D. Sacubitril/valsartan initiated in hospitalized patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction after hemodynamic stabilization: primary results of the TRANSITION study. J Card Fail. 2018; 24:S15.
Article
48. Velazquez EJ, Morrow DA, DeVore AD, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in acute decompensated heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380:539–548.
Article
49. Solomon SD, Rizkala AR, Gong J, et al. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: rationale and design of the PARAGON-HF trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2017; 5:471–482.
50. Solomon SD, Rizkala AR, Lefkowitz MP, et al. Baseline characteristics of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction in the PARAGON-HF trial. Circ Hear Fail. 2018; 11:e004962.
51. Tsutsui H, Momomura S, Saito Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in Japanese patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: rationale for and design of the randomized, double-blind PARALLEL-HF study. J Cardiol. 2017; 70:225–231.
Article
52. Woo KS, Nicholls MG. High prevalence of persistent cough with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in Chinese. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995; 40:141–144.
53. Mentz RJ, Roessig L, Greenberg BH, et al. Heart failure clinical trials in East and Southeast Asia: understanding the importance and defining the next steps. JACC Heart Fail. 2016; 4:419–427.
54. CONSENSUS Trial Study Group. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS). N Engl J Med. 1987; 316:1429–1435.
55. Yusuf S, Pitt B, Davis CE, Hood WB Jr, Cohn JN. SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on mortality and the development of heart failure in asymptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327:685–691.
Article
56. Cohn JN, Johnson G, Ziesche S, et al. A comparison of enalapril with hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325:303–310.
Article
57. Komajda M, Lutiger B, Madeira H, et al. Tolerability of carvedilol and ACE-inhibition in mild heart failure. Results of CARMEN (Carvedilol ACE-Inhibitor Remodelling Mild CHF EvaluatioN). Eur J Heart Fail. 2004; 6:467–475.
Article
58. Willenheimer R, van Veldhuisen DJ, Silke B, et al. Effect on survival and hospitalization of initiating treatment for chronic heart failure with bisoprolol followed by enalapril, as compared with the opposite sequence: results of the randomized Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS) III. Circulation. 2005; 112:2426–2435.
59. McMurray JJ, Krum H, Abraham WT, et al. Aliskiren, enalapril, or aliskiren and enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374:1521–1532.
Article
60. Heart Online Technology (CN). Guide: chronic HFrEF drug treatment, a summary! [Internet]. Beijing: Heart Online Technology;2018. cited 2019 Apr 10. Available from: http://www.heartonline.cn/themes/TPL_XZX003/views/details.html?id=5bd81316e12b371d4a5b8591&category=/information/infoSub&mark=/information/infoSub.
61. Kim MS, Lee JH, Kim EJ, et al. Korean guidelines for diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure. Korean Circ J. 2017; 47:555–643.
62. Wang CC, Chen JH, Yu WC, et al. 2012 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology (TSOC) for the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2012; 28:161–195.
63. Guha S, Harikrishnan S, Ray S, et al. CSI position statement on management of heart failure in India. Indian Heart J. 2018; 70:Suppl 1. S1–72.
64. Ministry of Health Malaysia. Management of heart failure [Internet]. Putrajaya: Ministry of Health Malaysia;2014. cited 2019 Apr 10. Available from: http://www.moh.gov.my/moh/resources/Penerbitan/CPG/CARDIOVASCULAR/8.pdf.
65. Buakhamsri A, Chirakarnjanakorn S, Sanguanwong S, Porapakkham P, Kanjanavanich R. Heart Failure Council of Thailand (HFCT) 2019 heart failure guideline: pharmacologic treatment of chronic heart failure - part I. J Med Assoc Thai. 2019; 102:240–244.
66. Yingchoncharoen T, Kanjanavanich R. Heart Failure Council of Thailand (HFCT) 2019 heart failure guideline: pharmacologic treatment of chronic heart failure - part II. J Med Assoc Thai. 2019; 102:368–372.
67. Ministry of Health, Singapore. Clinical practice guidelines: heart failure [Internet]. Singapore: Ministry of Health, Singapore;2004. cited 2019 Apr 10. Available from: https://www.moh.gov.sg/docs/librariesprovider4/guidelines/cpg_heart-failure-aug-2004.pdf.
Full Text Links
  • KCJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr