J Korean Neurosurg Soc.  2019 May;62(3):336-343. 10.3340/jkns.2019.0031.

From Resection to Disconnection for Seizure Control in Pediatric Epilepsy Children

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. dskim33@yuhs.ac

Abstract

Epilepsy surgery revealed dramatically improved seizure outcomes over medical therapy in drug-resistant epilepsy patients. Children with epilepsy, however, have multiple epileptic focuses which require multilobar resection for better seizure outcome. Multilobar resection has not only the several severe surgical complications, such as hydrocephalus and shunt-related craniosynostosis, due to intracranial volume reduction. Isolation method (disconnection surgery) was progressively studied over epileptic focus removal (resective surgery) for seizure control. This concept was first introduced for functional hemispherotomy, and its primary principle is to preserve the vital vascularized brain that is functionally disconnected from the contralateral healthy brain. Currently in most epilepsy centers, the predominant disconnection surgical methods, including functional hemispherotomy, are continually being refined and are showing excellent results. They allow the functional isolation of the hemisphere or multi-lobe, affected by severe epilepsy. This review describes recent findings concerning the indication, surgical technique, seizure outcome and complications in several disconnection surgeries including the functional hemispherotomy for refractory pediatric epilepsy.

Keyword

Functional hemispherotomy; Cerebral decortication; Epilepsy

MeSH Terms

Brain
Cerebral Decortication
Child*
Craniosynostoses
Epilepsy*
Humans
Hydrocephalus
Methods
Seizures*

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Postoperative MRI of several functional hemispherotomies. A : Postoperative MRI of peri-insular functional hemispherotomy. B : Postoperative MRI of transcortical transventricular functional hemispheroctomy. C : Postoperative MRI of transcallosal transventricular functional hemispherotomy. MRI : magnetic resonance imaging.

  • Fig. 2. Operative finding of several subhemispheric surgeries. A : Operative finding of anterior quadrantectomy. B : Operative finding of posterior quadrantectomy. C : Operative finding of posterior quadrantectomy, followed by frontal lobectomy. Final cortical incision margin (red line below) added on posterior quadrantectomy (light sea green line below). Lt. : left, H : hemisphere, F : frontal, PQ : posterior quadrantectomy.

  • Fig. 3. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of posterior quadrantectomy, followed by frontal lobectomy.


Reference

References

1. Bahuleyan B, Manjila S, Robinson S, Cohen AR. Minimally invasive endoscopic transventricular hemispherotomy for medically intractable epilepsy: a new approach and cadaveric demonstration. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 6:536–540. 2010.
Article
2. Basheer SN, Connolly MB, Lautzenhiser A, Sherman EM, Hendson G, Steinbok P. Hemispheric surgery in children with refractory epilepsy: seizure outcome, complications, and adaptive function. Epilepsia. 48:133–140. 2007.
Article
3. Battaglia D, Di Rocco C, Iuvone L, Acquafondata C, Iannelli A, Lettori D, et al. Neuro-cognitive development and epilepsy outcome in children with surgically treated hemimegalencephaly. Neuropediatrics. 30:307–313. 1999.
Article
4. Boshuisen K, van Schooneveld MM, Leijten FS, de Kort GA, van Rijen PC, Gosselaar PH, et al. Contralateral MRI abnormalities affect seizure and cognitive outcome after hemispherectomy. Neurology. 75:1623–1630. 2010.
Article
5. Bulteau C, Otsuki T, Delalande O. Epilepsy surgery for hemispheric syndromes in infants: hemimegalencepahly and hemispheric cortical dysplasia. Brain Dev. 35:742–747. 2013.
Article
6. Carreño M, Wyllie E, Bingaman W, Kotagal P, Comair Y, Ruggieri P. Seizure outcome after functional hemispherectomy for malformations of cortical development. Neurology. 57:331–333. 2001.
Article
7. Cats EA, Kho KH, Van Nieuwenhuizen O, Van Veelen CW, Gosselaar PH, Van Rijen PC. Seizure freedom after functional hemispherectomy and a possible role for the insular cortex: the Dutch experience. J Neurosurg. 107(4 Suppl):275–280. 2007.
Article
8. Chiron C, Raynaud C, Jambaqué I, Dulac O, Zilbovicius M, Syrota A. A serial study of regional cerebral blood flow before and after hemispherectomy in a child. Epilepsy Res. 8:232–240. 1991.
Article
9. Cook SW, Nguyen ST, Hu B, Yudovin S, Shields WD, Vinters HV, et al. Cerebral hemispherectomy in pediatric patients with epilepsy: comparison of three techniques by pathological substrate in 115 patients. J Neurosurg. 100(2 Suppl Pediatrics):125–141. 2004.
Article
10. Cross JH, Jayakar P, Nordli D, Delalande O, Duchowny M, Wieser HG, et al. Proposed criteria for referral and evaluation of children for epilepsy surgery: recommendations of the Subcommission for Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery. Epilepsia. 47:952–959. 2006.
Article
11. Curtiss S, de Bode S, Mathern GW. Spoken language outcomes after hemispherectomy: factoring in etiology. Brain Lang. 79:379–396. 2001.
Article
12. Daniel RT, Meagher-Villemure K, Farmer JP, Andermann F, Villemure JG. Posterior quadrantic epilepsy surgery: technical variants, surgical anatomy, and case series. Epilepsia. 48:1429–1437. 2007.
Article
13. de Almeida AN, Marino R Jr, Marie SK, Aguiar PH, Teixeira MJ. Factors of morbidity in hemispherectomies: surgical technique x pathology. Brain Dev. 28:215–222. 2006.
14. Delalande O, Bulteau C, Dellatolas G, Fohlen M, Jalin C, Buret V, et al. Vertical parasagittal hemispherotomy: surgical procedures and clinical long-term outcomes in a population of 83 children. Neurosurgery. 60(Suppl 1):ONS19–ONS32. discussion ONS32. 2007.
Article
15. Engel J Jr, Wiebe S. Who is a surgical candidate? Handb Clin Neurol. 108:821–828. 2012.
16. Engel J Jr, Wiebe S, French J, Sperling M, Williamson P, Spencer D, et al. Practice parameter: temporal lobe and localized neocortical resections for epilepsy: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, in association with the American Epilepsy Society and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Neurology. 60:538–547. 2003.
Article
17. Gonzalez-Martinez JA, Gupta A, Kotagal P, Lachhwani D, Wyllie E, Luders HO, et al. Hemispherectomy for catastrophic epilepsy in infants. Epilepsia. 46:1518–1525. 2005.
Article
18. Gowda S, Salazar F, Bingaman WE, Kotagal P, Lachhwani DL, Gupta A, et al. Surgery for catastrophic epilepsy in infants 6 months of age and younger. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 5:603–607. 2010.
Article
19. Hallbook T, Ruggieri P, Adina C, Lachhwani DK, Gupta A, Kotagal P, et al. Contralateral MRI abnormalities in candidates for hemispherectomy for refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 51:556–563. 2010.
Article
20. Holloway V, Gadian DG, Vargha-Khadem F, Porter DA, Boyd SG, Connelly A. The reorganization of sensorimotor function in children after hemispherectomy. A functional MRI and somatosensory evoked potential study. Brain 123 Pt. 12:2432–2444. 2000.
Article
21. Ignelzi RJ, Bucy PC. Cerebral hemidecortication in the treatment of infantile cerebral hemiatrophy. J Nerv Ment Dis. 147:14–30. 1968.
Article
22. Kishima H, Oshino S, Tani N, Maruo Y, Morris S, Khoo HM, et al. Which is the most appropriate disconnection surgery for refractory epilepsy in childhood? Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 53:814–820. 2013.
Article
23. Koszewski W, Czarkwiani L, Bidziński J. Multilobar resections in surgical treatment of medically intractable epilepsy. Neurol Neurochir Pol 32 Suppl. 2:81–94. 1998.
24. Krynauw RA. Infantile hemiplegia treated by removing one cerebral hemisphere. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 13:243–267. 1950.
Article
25. Kwan A, Ng WH, Otsubo H, Ochi A, Snead OC 3rd, Tamber MS, et al. Hemispherectomy for the control of intractable epilepsy in childhood: comparison of 2 surgical techniques in a single institution. Neurosurgery. 67(2 Suppl Operative):429–436. 2010.
Article
26. Leiphart JW, Peacock WJ, Mathern GW. Lobar and multilobar resections for medically intractable pediatric epilepsy. Pediatr Neurosurg. 34:311–318. 2001.
Article
27. Marras CE, Granata T, Franzini A, Freri E, Villani F, Casazza M, et al. Hemispherotomy and functional hemispherectomy: indications and outcome. Epilepsy Res. 89:104–112. 2010.
Article
28. McKenzie K. The present status of a patient who had the right cerebral hemisphere removed. JAMA. 111:168–183. 1938.
29. Morino M, Shimizu H, Ohata K, Tanaka K, Hara M. Anatomical analysis of different hemispherotomy procedures based on dissection of cadaveric brains. J Neurosurg. 97:423–431. 2002.
Article
30. Oppenheimer DR, Griffith HB. Persistent intracranial bleeding as a complication of hemispherectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 29:229–240. 1966.
Article
31. Pinto AL, Lohani S, Bergin AM, Bourgeois BF, Black PM, Prabhu SP, et al. Surgery for intractable epilepsy due to unilateral brain disease: a retrospective study comparing hemispherectomy techniques. Pediatr Neurol. 51:336–343. 2014.
Article
32. Rasmussen T. Hemispherectomy for seizures revisited. Can J Neurol Sci. 10:71–78. 1983.
Article
33. Rintahaka PJ, Chugani HT, Messa C, Phelps ME. Hemimegalencephaly: evaluation with positron emission tomography. Pediatr Neurol. 9:21–28. 1993.
Article
34. Saito Y, Sugai K, Nakagawa E, Sakuma H, Komaki H, Sasaki M, et al. Treatment of epilepsy in severely disabled children with bilateral brain malformations. J Neurol Sci. 277:37–49. 2009.
Article
35. Sarkis RA, Jehi L, Najm IM, Kotagal P, Bingaman WE. Seizure outcomes following multilobar epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. 53:44–50. 2012.
Article
36. Schramm J, Behrens E, Entzian W. Hemispherical deafferentation: an alternative to functional hemispherectomy. Neurosurgery. 36:509–515. discussion 515-506. 1995.
37. Schramm J, Kuczaty S, Sassen R, Elger CE, von Lehe M. Pediatric functional hemispherectomy: outcome in 92 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 154:2017–2028. 2012.
Article
38. Shim KW, Park EK, Kim DS, Choi JU. Neuroendoscopy: current and future perspectives. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 60:322–326. 2017.
39. Smith SJ, Andermann F, Villemure JG, Rasmussen TB, Quesney LF. Functional hemispherectomy: EEG findings, spiking from isolated brain postoperatively, and prediction of outcome. Neurology. 41:1790–1794. 1991.
Article
40. Soufflet C, Bulteau C, Delalande O, Pinton F, Jalin C, Plouin P, et al. The nonmalformed hemisphere is secondarily impaired in young children with hemimegalencephaly: a pre- and postsurgery study with SPECT and EEG. Epilepsia. 45:1375–1382. 2004.
Article
41. Villemure JG, Mascott CR. Peri-insular hemispherotomy: surgical principles and anatomy. Neurosurgery. 37:975–981. 1995.
42. Villemure JG, Daniel RT. Peri-insular hemispherotomy in paediatric epilepsy. Childs Nerv Syst. 22:967–981. 2006.
Article
43. Wiebe S, Blume WT, Girvin JP, Eliasziw M, Efficiency of Surgery for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Study Group. A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 345:311–318. 2001.
Article
44. Proposal for revised classification of epilepsies and epileptic syndromes. Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy. Epilepsia. 30:389–399. 1989.
Full Text Links
  • JKNS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr