J Clin Neurol.  2019 Jul;15(3):313-320. 10.3988/jcn.2019.15.3.313.

Validation Study of the Chinese Version of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III for Diagnosing Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, China. yfxh00@163.com
  • 2Department of Neurology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Sichuan Translational Medicine Research Hospital, Chengdu, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
There are only a few cognitive screening tests for the Chinese-speaking population, and so this study aimed to validate the Chinese version of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III) for detecting mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia. Its diagnostic accuracy was compared with the Chinese versions of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).
METHODS
The 176 included individuals were divided into 3 groups: mild dementia group, MCI group, and normal control group. MMSE, MoCA, and ACE-III were administered to all participants by researchers who were blinded to the clinical grouping. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were analyzed.
RESULTS
ACE-III exhibited good internal consistency and convergent validity. Age and education level significantly influenced the total ACE-III scores. When screening MCI, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was significantly larger for ACE-III than for MMSE (0.88 vs. 0.72, p<0.05) and MoCA (0.88 vs. 0.76, p<0.05). ACE-III showed higher sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.89) than MMSE (0.64 and 0.63, respectively) and MoCA (0.67 and 0.77) at the optimal cutoff score of 88/89. For detecting mild dementia, ACE-III yielded satisfactory sensitivity (0.94) and specificity (0.83) at the optimal cutoff score of 74/75. The AUC of ACE-III was 0.95, which was comparable to those of MMSE (0.95) and MoCA (0.91). In participants with ≥12 years of education, the AUC was significantly larger for ACE-III than for MMSE when detecting MCI (0.90 vs. 0.68, p<0.05) and mild dementia (0.97 vs. 0.90, p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The present study has verified that ACE-III is a reliable and accurate tool for screening MCI and mild dementia in the Chinese-speaking population, and is significantly superior to MMSE and MoCA for detecting MCI.

Keyword

validation studies; Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III; Chinese; dementia; mild cognitive impairment

MeSH Terms

Area Under Curve
Asian Continental Ancestry Group*
Dementia*
Education
Humans
Mass Screening
Methylenebis(chloroaniline)
Mild Cognitive Impairment*
ROC Curve
Sensitivity and Specificity
Methylenebis(chloroaniline)

Figure

  • Fig. 1 ROC curves of ACE-III, the MMSE, and the MoCA for screening MCI and mild dementia (A, B). ACE-III: Addenbrooke's ognitive Examination III, MCI: mild cognitive impairment, MMSE: Mini Mental State Examination, MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment, ROC: receiver operating characteristic.


Reference

1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing;2013. p. 602–611.
2. Kwon OY, Ahn HS, Kim HJ, Park KW. Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurol. 2017; 13:394–404. PMID: 29057632.
Article
3. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol. 1999; 56:303–308. PMID: 10190820.
4. Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med. 2004; 256:183–194. PMID: 15324362.
Article
5. Brodziak A, Wolińska A, Kołat E, Różyk-Myrta A. Guidelines for prevention and treatment of cognitive impairment in the elderly. Med Sci Monit. 2015; 21:585–597. PMID: 25708246.
Article
6. Lee J, Choi BH, Oh E, Sohn EH, Lee AY. Treatment of Alzheimer's disease with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive training: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Neurol. 2016; 12:57–64. PMID: 26365021.
Article
7. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12:189–198. PMID: 1202204.
8. Li H, Jia J, Yang Z. Mini-mental state examination in elderly Chinese: a population-based normative study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016; 53:487–496. PMID: 27163822.
Article
9. Markwick A, Zamboni G, De Jager CA. Profiles of cognitive subtest impairment in the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) in a research cohort with normal mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012; 34:750–757. PMID: 22468719.
Article
10. Mitchell AJ. A meta-analysis of the accuracy of the mini-mental state examination in the detection of dementia and mild cognitive impairment. J Psychiatr Res. 2009; 43:411–431. PMID: 18579155.
Article
11. Smith T, Gildeh N, Holmes C. The Montreal cognitive assessment: validity and utility in a memory clinic setting. Can J Psychiatry. 2007; 52:329–332. PMID: 17542384.
Article
12. Lu J, Li D, Li F, Zhou A, Wang F, Zuo X, et al. Montreal cognitive assessment in detecting cognitive impairment in Chinese elderly individuals: a population-based study. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2011; 24:184–190. PMID: 22228824.
Article
13. Yu J, Li J, Huang X. The Beijing version of the Montreal cognitive assessment as a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment: a community-based study. BMC Psychiatry. 2012; 12:156. PMID: 23009126.
Article
14. Hsieh S, Schubert S, Hoon C, Mioshi E, Hodges JR. Validation of the Addenbrooke's cognitive examination III in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2013; 36:242–250. PMID: 23949210.
Article
15. Elamin M, Holloway G, Bak TH, Pal S. The utility of the Addenbrooke's cognitive examination version three in early-onset dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2016; 41:9–15. PMID: 26473749.
Article
16. Matias-Guiu JA, Fernández de Bobadilla R, Escudero G, Pérez-Pérez J, Cortés A, Morenas-Rodríguez E, et al. Validation of the Spanish version of Addenbrooke's cognitive examination III for diagnosing dementia. Neurologia. 2015; 30:545–551. PMID: 25002342.
Article
17. Jubb MT, Evans JJ. An investigation of the utility of the Addenbrooke's cognitive examination III in the early detection of dementia in memory clinic patients aged over 75 years. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2015; 40:222–232. PMID: 26227172.
Article
18. Wang BR, Ou Z, Gu XH, Wei CS, Xu J, Shi JQ. Validation of the Chinese version of Addenbrooke's cognitive examination III for diagnosing dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017; 32:e173–e179. PMID: 28170114.
Article
19. Peixoto B, Machado M, Rocha P, Macedo C, Machado A, Baeta É, et al. Validation of the Portuguese version of Addenbrooke's cognitive examination III in mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018; 27:781–786. PMID: 29790690.
Article
20. Pigliautile M, Chiesi F, Stablum F, Rossetti S, Primi C, Chiloiro D, et al. Italian version and normative data of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III. Int Psychogeriatr. 2019; 31:241–249. PMID: 30021668.
Article
21. Lim WS, Chong MS, Sahadevan S. Utility of the clinical dementia rating in Asian populations. Clin Med Res. 2007; 5:61–70. PMID: 17456836.
Article
22. Kempler D, Teng EL, Taussig M, Dick MB. The common objects memory test (COMT): a simple test with cross-cultural applicability. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010; 16:537–545. PMID: 20188016.
Article
23. Fang R, Wang G, Huang Y, Zhuang JP, Tang HD, Wang Y, et al. Validation of the Chinese version of Addenbrooke's cognitive examination-revised for screening mild Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2014; 37:223–231. PMID: 24193223.
Article
24. Yoshida H, Terada S, Honda H, Kishimoto Y, Takeda N, Oshima E, et al. Validation of the revised Addenbrooke's cognitive examination (ACE-R) for detecting mild cognitive impairment and dementia in a Japanese population. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012; 24:28–37. PMID: 21843399.
Article
25. Matias-Guiu JA, Cortés-Martínez A, Valles-Salgado M, Rognoni T, Fernández-Matarrubia M, Moreno-Ramos T, et al. Addenbrooke's cognitive examination III: diagnostic utility for mild cognitive impairment and dementia and correlation with standardized neuropsychological tests. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017; 29:105–113. PMID: 27682860.
Article
26. Matías-Guiu JA, Valles-Salgado M, Rognoni T, Hamre-Gil F, Moreno-Ramos T, Matías-Guiu J. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of the ACE-III, MIS, MMSE, MoCA, and RUDAS for screening of Alzheimer disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017; 43:237–246. PMID: 28384640.
Article
27. Cheung G, Clugston A, Croucher M, Malone D, Mau E, Sims A, et al. Performance of three cognitive screening tools in a sample of older New Zealanders. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015; 27:981–989. PMID: 25603424.
Article
28. Terpening Z, Cordato NJ, Hepner IJ, Lucas SK, Lindley RI. Utility of the Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination--revised for the diagnosis of dementia syndromes. Australas J Ageing. 2011; 30:113–118. PMID: 21923703.
Full Text Links
  • JCN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr