Korean J Pain.  2019 Apr;32(2):120-128. 10.3344/kjp.2019.32.2.120.

Fibromyalgia diagnostic model derived from combination of American College of Rheumatology 1990 and 2011 criteria

Affiliations
  • 1Rheumatology Research Center, Razi Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
  • 2Department of Rheumatology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. bidari.a@iums.ac.ir
  • 3ENT and Head and Neck Research Center and Department, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • 4Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
We aimed to explore the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 and 2011 fibromyalgia (FM) classification criteria's items and the components of Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) to identify features best discriminating FM features. Finally, we developed a combined FM diagnostic (C-FM) model using the FM's key features.
METHODS
The means and frequency on tender points (TPs), ACR 2011 components and FIQ items were calculated in the FM and non-FM (osteoarthritis [OA] and non-OA) patients. Then, two-step multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to order these variables according to their maximal statistical contribution in predicting group membership. Partial correlations assessed their unique contribution, and two-group discriminant analysis provided a classification table. Using receiver operator characteristic analyses, we determined the sensitivity and specificity of the final model.
RESULTS
A total of 172 patients with FM, 75 with OA and 21 with periarthritis or regional pain syndromes were enrolled. Two steps multiple logistic regression analysis identified 8 key features of FM which accounted for 64.8% of variance associated with FM group membership: lateral epicondyle TP with variance percentages (36.9%), neck pain (14.5%), fatigue (4.7%), insomnia (3%), upper back pain (2.2%), shoulder pain (1.5%), gluteal TP (1.2%), and FIQ fatigue (0.9%). The C-FM model demonstrated a 91.4% correct classification rate, 91.9% for sensitivity and 91.7% for specificity.
CONCLUSIONS
The C-FM model can accurately detect FM patients among other pain disorders. Re-inclusion of TPs along with saving of FM main symptoms in the C-FM model is a unique feature of this model.

Keyword

Chronic pain; Discriminant analysis; Fatigue; Fibromyalgia; Logistic models; Neck pain; Osteoarthritis; Periarthritis; Sensitivity and specificity; Shoulder pain; Sleep initiation and maintenance disorders; Survey and questionnaires

MeSH Terms

Back Pain
Chronic Pain
Classification
Discriminant Analysis
Fatigue
Fibromyalgia*
Humans
Logistic Models
Neck Pain
Osteoarthritis
Periarthritis
Rheumatology*
Sensitivity and Specificity
Shoulder Pain
Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

Cited by  2 articles

Optimal Cut-Off Value of the Coracohumeral Ligament Area as a Morphological Parameter to Confirm Frozen Shoulder
Hyung Rae Cho, Byong Hyon Cho, Keum Nae Kang, Young Uk Kim
J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35(15):e99.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e99.

The current status of fibromyalgia in Korea: an electronic population health data study in Korea
Cheol-Hyeong Lee, Eun Young Lee, Miyoung Yang, Hyung-Sun Won, Yeon-Dong Kim
Korean J Pain. 2023;36(4):458-464.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.23204.


Reference

1. Borchers AT, Gershwin ME. Fibromyalgia: a critical and comprehensive review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2015; 49:100–51. DOI: 10.1007/s12016-015-8509-4. PMID: 26445775.
Article
2. Mease PJ, Arnold LM, Crofford LJ, Williams DA, Russell IJ, Humphrey L, et al. Identifying the clinical domains of fibromyalgia: contributions from clinician and patient Delphi exercises. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 59:952–60. DOI: 10.1002/art.23826. PMID: 18576290.
Article
3. Wolfe F, Walitt B. Culture, science and the changing nature of fibromyalgia. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013; 9:751–5. DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.96. PMID: 23820862.
Article
4. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, Bennett RM, Bombardier C, Goldenberg DL, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum. 1990; 33:160–72. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780330203. PMID: 2306288.
5. Wolfe F. Editorial: the status of fibromyalgia criteria. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67:330–3. DOI: 10.1002/art.38908. PMID: 25303359.
Article
6. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Katz RS, Mease P, et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010; 62:600–10. DOI: 10.1002/acr.20140. PMID: 20461783.
Article
7. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Häuser W, Katz RS, et al. Fibromyalgia criteria and severity scales for clinical and epidemiological studies: a modification of the ACR Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol. 2011; 38:1113–22. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.100594. PMID: 21285161.
Article
8. Egloff N, von Känel R, Müller V, Egle UT, Kokinogenis G, Lederbogen S, et al. Implications of proposed fibromyalgia criteria across other functional pain syndromes. Scand J Rheumatol. 2015; 44:416–24. DOI: 10.3109/03009742.2015.1010103. PMID: 26079770.
Article
9. Smythe HA. Unhelpful criteria sets for “diagnosis” and “assessment of severity” of fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol. 2011; 38:975–8. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.110142. PMID: 21632687.
Article
10. Friend R, Bennett RM. A critical examination of the polysymptomatic distress scale construct as a symptom severity questionnaire. J Rheumatol. 2015; 42:1364–7. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.150611. PMID: 26233950.
Article
11. Desmeules JA, Cedraschi C, Rapiti E, Baumgartner E, Finckh A, Cohen P, et al. Neurophysiologic evidence for a central sensitization in patients with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2003; 48:1420–9. DOI: 10.1002/art.10893. PMID: 12746916.
Article
12. Bennett R. The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ): a review of its development, current version, operating characteristics and uses. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005; 23(5 Suppl 39):S154–62. PMID: 16273800.
13. Bennett RM, Friend R, Marcus D, Bernstein C, Han BK, Yachoui R, et al. Criteria for the diagnosis of fibromyalgia: validation of the modified 2010 preliminary American College of Rheumatology criteria and the development of alternative criteria. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014; 66:1364–73. DOI: 10.1002/acr.22301. PMID: 24497443.
Article
14. Ghavidel-Parsa B, Bidari A, Maafi AA, Hassankhani A, Hajiabbasi A, Montazeri A, et al. The impact of fibromyalgia on health status according to the types, demographic background and pain index. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016; 34(2 Suppl 96):S134–9. PMID: 27157398.
15. Bidari A, Ghav idel-Parsa B, Amir Maafi A, Montazeri A, Ghalehbaghi B, Hassankhani A, et al. Validation of fibromyalgia survey questionnaire and polysymptomatic distress scale in a Persian population. Rheumatol Int. 2015; 35:2013–9. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-015-3340-z. PMID: 26581782.
Article
16. Bidari A, Hassanzadeh M, Mohabat MF, Talachian E, Khoei EM. Validation of a Persian version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ-P). Rheumatol Int. 2014; 34:181–9. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-013-2883-0. PMID: 24166211.
Article
17. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Häuser W, Katz RL, et al. 2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016; 46:319–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.08.012. PMID: 27916278.
Article
18. Schmidt-Wilcke T, Clauw DJ. Fibromyalgia: from pathophysiology to therapy. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011; 7:518–27. DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2011.98. PMID: 21769128.
Article
19. Segura-Jiménez V, Álvarez-Gallardo IC, Carbonell-Baeza A, Aparicio VA, Ortega FB, Casimiro AJ, et al. Fibromyalgia has a larger impact on physical health than on psychological health, yet both are markedly affected: the al-Ándalus project. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015; 44:563–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.09.010. PMID: 25440155.
Article
20. Tastekin N, Uzunca K, Sut N, Birtane M, Mercimek OB. Discriminative value of tender points in fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain Med. 2010; 11:466–71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00784.x. PMID: 20088857.
Article
21. Friend R, Bennett RM. Distinguishing fibromyalgia from rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus in clinical questionnaires: an analysis of the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) and its variant, the Symptom Impact Questionnaire (SIQR), along with pain locations. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011; 13:R58. DOI: 10.1186/ar3311. PMID: 21477308. PMCID: 3132053.
Article
22. Silverman SL, Harnett J, Zlateva G, Mardekian J. Identifying fibromyalgia-associated symptoms and conditions from a clinical perspective: a step toward evaluating healthcare resource utilization in fibromyalgia. Pain Pract. 2010; 10:520–9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2010.00383.x. PMID: 20492578.
Article
23. Tesio V, Torta DM, Colonna F, Leombruni P, Ghiggia A, Fusaro E, et al. Are fibromyalgia patients cognitively impaired? Objective and subjective neuropsychological evidence. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015; 67:143–50. DOI: 10.1002/acr.22403. PMID: 25047247.
Article
24. Fitzcharles MA, Ste-Marie PA, Goldenberg DL, Pereira JX, Abbey S, Choinière M, et al. 2012 Canadian Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of fibromyalgia syndrome: executive summary. Pain Res Manag. 2013; 18:119–26. DOI: 10.1155/2013/918216. PMID: 23748251. PMCID: 3673928.
Article
25. Ghav idel-Parsa B, Amir Maafi A, Aarabi Y, Haghdoost A, Khojamli M, Montazeri A, et al. Correlation of invalidation with symptom severity and health status in fibromyalgia. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015; 54:482–6. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu355. PMID: 25205826.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr