1. Tarczy-Hornoch K, Varma R, Cotter SA, et al. Risk factors for decreased visual acuity in preschool children: the multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease and Baltimore pediatric eye disease studies. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118:2262–2273.
2. Afsari S, Rose KA, Gole GA, et al. Prevalence of anisometropia and its association with refractive error and amblyopia in preschool children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013; 97:1095–1099.
Article
3. de Vries J. Anisometropia in children: analysis of a hospital population. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985; 69:504–507.
Article
4. Ingram RM, Traynar MJ, Walker C, Wilson JM. Screening for refractive errors at age 1 year: a pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1979; 63:243–250.
Article
5. Abrahamsson M, Sjostrand J. Natural history of infantile anisometropia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996; 80:860–863.
Article
6. Oguz H, Oguz V. The effects of experimentally induced anisometropia on stereopsis. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2000; 37:214–218.
Article
7. Kim JH, Kim CR, Yoo JM. Myopia progression of full correction and undercorrection with myopic anisometropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2018; 59:164–168.
Article
8. Fink WH. The dominant eye: its clinical significance. Arch Ophthalmol. 1938; 19:555–582.
9. Porac C, Coren S. The dominant eye. Psychol Bull. 1976; 83:880–897.
Article
10. Mapp AP, Ono H, Barbeito R. What does the dominant eye dominate? A brief and somewhat contentious review. Percept Psychophys. 2003; 65:310–317.
Article
11. Lin SY, White GE. Mandibular position and head posture as a function of eye dominance. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1996; 20:133–140.
12. Coren S, Duckman RH. Ocular dominance and amblyopia. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1975; 52:47–50.
Article
13. Kawata H, Ohtsuka K. Dynamic asymmetries in convergence eye movements under natural viewing conditions. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2001; 45:437–444.
Article
14. Saw SM, Katz J, Schein OD, et al. Epidemiology of myopia. Epidemiol Rev. 1996; 18:175–187.
Article
15. Chen JC, Schmid KL, Brown B. The autonomic control of accommodation and implications for human myopia development: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2003; 23:401–422.
Article
16. Goss DA, Wickham MG. Retinal-image mediated ocular growth as a mechanism for juvenile onset myopia and for emmetropization. A literature review. Doc Ophthalmol. 1995; 90:341–375.
17. Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Bauer J, Held R. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993; 34:690–694.
18. Ibi K. Characteristics of dynamic accommodation responses: comparison between the dominant and non-dominant eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1997; 17:44–54.
Article
19. Cheng CY, Yen MY, Lin HY, et al. Association of ocular dominance and anisometropic myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45:2856–2860.
Article
20. Jiang F, Chen Z, Bi H, et al. Association between ocular sensory dominance and refractive error asymmetry. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0136222.
Article
21. Ito M, Shimizu K, Kawamorita T, et al. Association between ocular dominance and refractive asymmetry. J Refract Surg. 2013; 29:716–720.
Article
22. Linke SJ, Baviera J, Munzer G, et al. Association between ocular dominance and spherical/astigmatic anisometropia, age, and sex: analysis of 10,264 myopic individuals. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52:9166–9173.
Article
23. Linke SJ, Baviera J, Richard G, Katz T. Association between ocular dominance and spherical/astigmatic anisometropia, age, and sex: analysis of 1274 hyperopic individuals. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53:5362–5369.
Article
24. Chia A, Jaurigue A, Gazzard G, et al. Ocular dominance, laterality, and refraction in Singaporean children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48:3533–3536.
Article
25. Yang Z, Lan W, Liu W, et al. Association of ocular dominance and myopia development: a 2-year longitudinal study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49:4779–4783.
Article
26. Cho KJ, Kim SY, Yang SW. The refractive errors of dominant and non-dominant eyes. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2009; 50:275–279.
Article
27. Brackenridge CJ. The contribution of genetic factors to ocular dominance. Behav Genet. 1982; 12:319–325.
Article