Ann Surg Treat Res.  2019 Mar;96(3):131-137. 10.4174/astr.2019.96.3.131.

Pattern and degree of radiation exposure during endovascular surgery performed using a mobile C-arm or in a hybrid room

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Vascular Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
  • 2Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea. phoenixdr@naver.com

Abstract

PURPOSE
A prospective study was conducted to compare radiation exposure to different parts of an endovascular surgeon's body when using a mobile C-arm with that in a hybrid room.
METHODS
Exposure during individual procedures performed on 39 patients with a mobile C-arm and 42 patients in a hybrid room, from July 2016 to December 2016, was evaluated.
RESULTS
The procedures performed, fluoroscopy time, and dose-area product were not significantly different between groups. The dose-area product per second in the hybrid room group appeared greater than in the C-arm group (4.5 µGym2/sec vs. 3.1 µGym2/sec). In the C-arm group, the peak skin dose on the right neck (1.77 mSv) and shoulder (1.48 mSv) appeared higher than those on their left side (0.32 mSv, 0.53 mSv, respectively) and the counterparts of the hybrid room group (0.88 mSv, 0.20 mSv, respectively).
CONCLUSION
The peak skin dose in the hybrid room appeared highest for the lower part of the protective apron. The dose-area product per second seemed to be greater in the hybrid room than when using the C-arm. Thus, attention should be focused on protecting the surgeon's upper body when using the C-arm and the lower body when using the hybrid room.

Keyword

Endovascular procedures; Surgeons; Operating rooms; Fluoroscopy; Radiation

MeSH Terms

Endovascular Procedures
Fluoroscopy
Humans
Neck
Operating Rooms
Prospective Studies
Radiation Exposure*
Shoulder
Skin
Surgeons

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Bodily locations of the dosimeters. Dosimeters were placed on the right side of the head (1), both sides of the neck (2), both shoulders (1 per shoulder), the chest (1), and the lower part of the protective apron (1).


Reference

1. Toledo-Pereyra LH. X-rays surgical revolution. J Invest Surg. 2009; 22:327–332. PMID: 19842886.
Article
2. Nobel lectures in physics 1901-1921. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Company;1967.
3. Togni M, Balmer F, Pfiffner D, Maier W, Zeiher AM, Meier B, et al. Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe 1992-2001. Eur Heart J. 2004; 25:1208–1213. PMID: 15246638.
Article
4. Vano E, Gonzalez L, Guibelalde E, Fernandez JM, Ten JI. Radiation exposure to medical staff in interventional and cardiac radiology. Br J Radiol. 1998; 71:954–960. PMID: 10195011.
5. Cousins C, Sharp C. Medical interventional procedures-reducing the radiation risks. Clin Radiol. 2004; 59:468–473. PMID: 15145716.
Article
6. Tsapaki V, Kottou S, Vano E, Parviainen T, Padovani R, Dowling A, et al. Correlation of patient and staff doses in interventional cardiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005; 117:26–29. PMID: 16461537.
Article
7. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. New York: United Nations;2001.
8. Venneri L, Rossi F, Botto N, Andreassi MG, Salcone N, Emad A, et al. Cancer risk from professional exposure in staff working in cardiac catheterization laboratory: insights from the National Research Council's Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII Report. Am Heart J. 2009; 157:118–124. PMID: 19081407.
Article
9. Neofotistou V, Vano E, Padovani R, Kotre J, Dowling A, Toivonen M, et al. Preliminary reference levels in interventional cardiology. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13:2259–2263. PMID: 14534803.
Article
10. Kocinaj D, Cioppa A, Ambrosini G, Tesorio T, Salemme L, Sorropago G, et al. Radiation dose exposure during cardiac and peripheral arteries catheterisation. Int J Cardiol. 2006; 113:283–284. PMID: 16330116.
Article
11. Bernardi G, Padovani R, Morocutti G, Vano E, Malisan MR, Rinuncini M, et al. Clinical and technical determinants of the complexity of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures: analysis in relation to radiation exposure parameters. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000; 51:1–9. PMID: 10973008.
Article
12. Perisinakis K, Theocharopoulos N, Damilakis J, Manios E, Vardas P, Gourtsoyiannis N. Fluoroscopically guided implantation of modern cardiac resynchronization devices: radiation burden to the patient and associated risks. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46:2335–2339. PMID: 16360068.
13. Goodney PP, Beck AW, Nagle J, Welch HG, Zwolak RM. National trends in lower extremity bypass surgery, endovascular interventions, and major amputations. J Vasc Surg. 2009; 50:54–60. PMID: 19481407.
Article
14. Giles KA, Pomposelli F, Hamdan A, Wyers M, Jhaveri A, Schermerhorn ML. Decrease in total aneurysm-related deaths in the era of endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2009; 49:543–550. PMID: 19135843.
Article
15. Lipsitz EC, Veith FJ, Ohki T, Heller S, Wain RA, Suggs WD, et al. Does the endovascular repair of aortoiliac aneurysms pose a radiation safety hazard to vascular surgeons? J Vasc Surg. 2000; 32:704–710. PMID: 11013034.
Article
16. Bordoli SJ, Carsten CG 3rd, Cull DL, Johnson BL, Taylor SM. Radiation safety education in vascular surgery training. J Vasc Surg. 2014; 59:860–864. PMID: 24360583.
Article
17. Efstathopoulos EP, Katritsis DG, Kottou S, Kalivas N, Tzanalaridou E, Giazitzoglou E, et al. Patient and staff radiation dosimetry during cardiac electrophysiology studies and catheter ablation procedures: a comprehensive analysis. Europace. 2006; 8:443–448. PMID: 16690631.
Article
18. Zorzetto M, Bernardi G, Morocutti G, Fontanelli A. Radiation exposure to patients and operators during diagnostic catheterization and coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1997; 40:348–351. PMID: 9096931.
Article
19. Finci L, Meier B, Steffenino G, Roy P, Rutishauser W. Radiation exposure during diagnostic catheterization and single- and double-vessel percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1987; 60:1401–1403. PMID: 2961242.
Article
20. Dash H, Leaman DM. Operator radiation exposure during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984; 4:725–728. PMID: 6237143.
Article
21. Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB, Clark DA, Cusma JT, Dehmer GJ, et al. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37:2170–2214. PMID: 11419904.
22. Padovani R, Vano E, Trianni A, Bokou C, Bosmans H, Bor D, et al. Reference levels at European level for cardiac interventional procedures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008; 129:104–107. PMID: 18310612.
Article
23. Foti C, Padovani R, Trianni A, Bokou C, Christofides S, Corbett RH, et al. Staff dosimetry in interventional cardiology: survey on methods and level of exposure. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008; 129:100–103. PMID: 18287188.
Article
24. Vano E, Gonzalez L, Fernandez JM, Alfonso F, Macaya C. Occupational radiation doses in interventional cardiology: a 15-year follow-up. Br J Radiol. 2006; 79:383–388. PMID: 16632618.
25. Bannazadeh M, Altinel O, Kashyap VS, Sun Z, Clair D, Sarac TP. Patterns of procedure-specific radiation exposure in the endovascular era: impetus for further innovation. J Vasc Surg. 2009; 49:1520–1524. PMID: 19497515.
Article
26. Wrixon AD. New ICRP recommendations. J Radiol Prot. 2008; 28:161–168. PMID: 18495983.
Article
27. Ho P, Cheng SW, Wu PM, Ting AC, Poon JT, Cheng CK, et al. Ionizing radiation absorption of vascular surgeons during endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2007; 46:455–459. PMID: 17826233.
Article
28. Brown KR, Rzucidlo E. Acute and chronic radiation injury. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 53(1 Suppl):15S–21S. PMID: 20843630.
Article
29. Ascher E, Marks NA, Schutzer RW, Hingorani AP. Duplex-guided balloon angioplasty and stenting for femoropopliteal arterial occlusive disease: an alternative in patients with renal insufficiency. J Vasc Surg. 2005; 42:1108–1113. PMID: 16376200.
Article
30. Raman VK, Karmarkar PV, Guttman MA, Dick AJ, Peters DC, Ozturk C, et al. Real-time magnetic resonance-guided endovascular repair of experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm in swine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45:2069–2077. PMID: 15963411.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ASTR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr