Ann Coloproctol.  2018 Oct;34(5):259-265. 10.3393/ac.2018.05.04.

Clinical Outcomes of a Redo for a Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis

Affiliations
  • 1Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea. parkjs0802@mail.knu.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
Redo surgery in patients with a persistent anastomotic failure (PAF) is a rare procedure, and data about this procedure are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of redo surgery in such patients.
METHODS
Patients who underwent a redo anastomosis for PAF from January 2004 to November 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Data from a prospective colorectal database were analyzed. Success was defined as the combined absence of any anastomosis-related complications and a stoma at the last follow-up.
RESULTS
A total of 1,964 patients who underwent curative surgery for rectal cancer during this study period were included. Among them, 32 consecutive patients underwent a redo anastomosis for PAF. Thirteen patients of those 32 had major anastomotic dehiscence with a pelvic sinus, 12 had a recto-vaginal fistula, and 7 had anastomosis stenosis. There were no postoperative deaths. The median operation time was 255 minutes (range, 80-480 minutes), and the median blood loss was 80 mL (range, 30-1,000 mL). The overall success rate was 78.1%, and the morbidity rate was 40.6%. Multivariable analyses showed that the primary tumor height at the lower level was the only statistically significant risk factor for redo surgery (P = 0.042; hazard ratio, 2.444).
CONCLUSION
In our experience, a redo anastomosis is a feasible surgical option that allows closure of a stoma in nearly 80% of patients. Lower tumor height (<5 cm from the anal verge) is the only independent risk factor for nonclosure of defunctioning stomas after primary rectal surgery.

Keyword

Redo surgery; Rectal cancer; Persistent anastomotic failure; Laparoscopy

MeSH Terms

Constriction, Pathologic
Fistula
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Laparoscopy
Prospective Studies
Rectal Neoplasms
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Full Text Links
  • AC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr