Clin Nutr Res.  2018 Jul;7(3):213-222. 10.7762/cnr.2018.7.3.213.

Comparison of 3 Nutritional Questionnaires to Determine Energy Intake Accuracy in Iranian Adults

Affiliations
  • 1Student Research Committee, Faculty of Nutritional Sciences and Food Technology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6715847141, Iran.
  • 2Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Nutritional Sciences and Food Technology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6715847141, Iran. Yahya.Pasdar@kums.ac.ir
  • 3Environmental Determinates of Health Research Center, School of Public Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6715847141, Iran.
  • 4Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Communing Developmental and Health Promotion Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6715847141, Iran.
  • 5Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6715847141, Iran.

Abstract

A precision instrument is required to assess the nutritional status. This study was conducted on comparison of 3 nutritional questionnaires to determine energy intake (EI) accuracy in adults in Ravansar Non-Communicable Chronic Disease (RaNCD) cohort study. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 118 of participant's RaNCD. EI was evaluated with 3 questionnaires including food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), 24-hours recall (24HR), and food habits questionnaire (FHQ). Resting metabolic rate (RMR) was measured using indirect calorimetry. We used EI/RMR cut off to evaluate EI reporting status. The mean ± standard deviation of age in men and women were 44.1 ± 6.5 and 43.7 ± 5.25 respectively and 50.8% of participants were men. Among 3 EI estimating questionnaires, FFQ was more accurate than 2 other questionnaires (67.8%). We observed that implausible reporters of 24HR were likely overweight (p < 0.005) but we did not observe a significant difference between EI reporting of FFQ and FHQ with participants' body composition. Our finding showed that EI underreporting of 24HR and FHQ were high. Under reporters were seemed to be overweight. Therefore, these results suggested that among 3 nutritional questionnaires the FFQ was an appropriate approach to determine EI in this population due to plausible EI reporting was higher than 2 other nutritional questionnaires (24HR and FHQ).

Keyword

Nutritional status; Energy intake; Indirect calorimetry; Chronic disease

MeSH Terms

Adult*
Body Composition
Calorimetry, Indirect
Chronic Disease
Cohort Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Energy Intake*
Female
Food Habits
Humans
Male
Nutritional Status
Overweight

Figure

  • Figure 1 Multivariable-adjusted ORs and 95% CIs for EI underreporting of 24HR across weight, BMI, and BFM. In adjusted model, age, gender, and physical activity were controlled. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; EI, energy intake; 24HR, 24-hours recall; BMI, body mass index; BFM, body fat mass.

  • Figure 2 Macronutrients intake and EI reporting of 3 questionnaires. EI, energy intake; FFQ, food frequency questionnaire; 24HR, 24 hour recall; FHQ, food habits questionnaire; LR, low reporting; PR, plausible reporting; HR, high reporting; Cho, carbohydrate.


Reference

1. Talegawkar SA, Tanaka T, Maras JE, Ferrucci L, Tucker KL. Validation of nutrient intake estimates derived using a semi-quantitative FFQ against 3 day diet records in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Nutr Health Aging. 2015; 19:994–1002.
Article
2. Tooze JA, Vitolins MZ, Smith SL, Arcury TA, Davis CC, Bell RA, DeVellis RF, Quandt SA. High levels of low energy reporting on 24-hour recalls and three questionnaires in an elderly low-socioeconomic status population. J Nutr. 2007; 137:1286–1293.
Article
3. Markussen MS, Veierød MB, Ursin G, Andersen LF. The effect of under-reporting of energy intake on dietary patterns and on the associations between dietary patterns and self-reported chronic disease in women aged 50–69 years. Br J Nutr. 2016; 116:547–558.
Article
4. Sunami A, Sasaki K, Suzuki Y, Oguma N, Ishihara J, Nakai A, Yasuda J, Yokoyama Y, Yoshizaki T, Tada Y, Hida A, Kawano Y. Validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for collegiate athletes. J Epidemiol. 2016; 26:284–291.
Article
5. Stice E, Palmrose CA, Burger KS. Elevated BMI and male sex are associated with greater underreporting of caloric intake as assessed by doubly labeled water. J Nutr. 2015; 145:2412–2418.
Article
6. Goldberg GR, Black AE, Jebb SA, Cole TJ, Murgatroyd PR, Coward WA, Prentice AM. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991; 45:569–581.
7. Shaneshin M, Jessri M, Rashidkhani B. Validity of energy intake reports in relation to dietary patterns. J Health Popul Nutr. 2014; 32:36–45.
8. Mahan LK, Raymond JL. Intake: energy. In : Mahan LK, Raymond JL, editors. Krause's food & the nutrition care process. 14th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier Health Sciences;2016. p. 17.
9. Esfahani FH, Asghari G, Mirmiran P, Azizi F. Reproducibility and relative validity of food group intake in a food frequency questionnaire developed for the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. J Epidemiol. 2010; 20:150–158.
Article
10. Fatihah F, Ng BK, Hazwanie H, Norimah AK, Shanita SN, Ruzita AT, Poh BK. Development and validation of a food frequency questionnaire for dietary intake assessment among multi-ethnic primary school-aged children. Singapore Med J. 2015; 56:687–694.
Article
11. Gallagher M. Intake: the nutrients and their metabolism. In : Mahan L, Escott-Stump S, Raymond J, editors. Krause's food & the nutrition care process. 13th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences;2012. p. 113.
12. Nieman DC, Austin MD, Benezra L, Pearce S, McInnis T, Unick J, Gross SJ. Validation of Cosmed's FitMate in measuring oxygen consumption and estimating resting metabolic rate. Res Sports Med. 2006; 14:89–96.
Article
13. Brisswalter J, Tartaruga MP. Comparison of COSMED'S FitMate™ and K4b2 metabolic systems reliability during graded cycling exercise. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2014; 74:722–724.
Article
14. Nieman DC, Lasasso H, Austin MD, Pearce S, McInnis T, Unick J. Validation of Cosmed's FitMate in measuring exercise metabolism. Res Sports Med. 2007; 15:67–75.
Article
15. Willett WC, Dietz WH, Colditz GA. Guidelines for healthy weight. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341:427–434.
Article
16. Ghaffarpour M, Houshiar-Rad A, Kianfar H. The manual for household measures, cooking yields factors and edible portion of foods. Tehran: Nashre Olume Keshavarzy;1999.
17. Nematy M, Nouri M, Ghazizahedi S, Norouzy A, Mohajeri S, Shalaei N, et al. Validity and reproducibility of Iranian food frequency questionnaire. Switz Res Park J. 2013; 102:2137–2146.
18. van Pelt RE, Dinneno FA, Seals DR, Jones PP. Age-related decline in RMR in physically active men: relation to exercise volume and energy intake. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 281:E633–E639.
Article
19. Jian L, Binns CW, Lee AH. Validity of a food-frequency questionnaire for elderly men in southeast China. Public Health Nutr. 2006; 9:928–933.
Article
20. Mirmiran P, Esmaillzadeh A, Azizi F. Under-reporting of energy intake affects estimates of nutrient intakes. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2006; 15:459–464.
21. Hare ME, Sherrill-Mittleman D, Klesges RC, Lanctot JQ, Klesges LM. Energy underreporting in African-American girls: a longitudinal analysis. Child Obes. 2012; 8:551–560.
Article
22. Mirmiran P, Nemati K, Kalantari N, Azizi F. Underreporting in nutritional surveys. J Qazvin Univ Med Sci. 2003; 7:135–144.
23. Mendez MA, Popkin BM, Buckland G, Schroder H, Amiano P, Barricarte A, Huerta JM, Quirós JR, Sánchez MJ, González CA. Alternative methods of accounting for underreporting and overreporting when measuring dietary intake-obesity relations. Am J Epidemiol. 2011; 173:448–458.
Article
24. Rhee JJ, Sampson L, Cho E, Hughes MD, Hu FB, Willett WC. Comparison of methods to account for implausible reporting of energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2015; 181:225–233.
Article
25. Palacios C, Trak MA, Betancourt J, Joshipura K, Tucker KL. Validation and reproducibility of a semi-quantitative FFQ as a measure of dietary intake in adults from Puerto Rico. Public Health Nutr. 2015; 18:2550–2558.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CNR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr