Investig Clin Urol.  2018 May;59(3):187-193. 10.4111/icu.2018.59.3.187.

Prostate calcifications: A case series supporting the microbial biofilm theory

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Santa Chiara Regional Hospital, Trento, Italy. ktommy@libero.it
  • 2Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
  • 3Healthcare Research and Innovation Program (IRCS-PAT), Bruno Kessler Foundation, Trento, Italy.
  • 4Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.
  • 5Sexually Transmitted Disease Centre, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Florence, Italy.
  • 6Department of Urology, University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
  • 7Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Prostate calcifications are a common finding during transrectal prostate ultrasound in both healthy subjects and patients, but their etiopathogenesis and clinical significance are not fully understood. We aimed to establish a new methodology for evaluating the role of microbial biofilms in the genesis of prostate calcifications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ten consecutive patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy were enrolled in this study. All of the patients presented with prostate calcifications during transrectal ultrasound evaluation before surgery and underwent Meares-Stamey tests and clinical evaluation with the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index and the International Prostate Symptom Score. At the time of radical prostatectomy, the prostate specimen, after removal, was analyzed with ultrasonography under sterile conditions in the operating room. Core biopsy specimens were taken from the site of prostate calcification and subjected to ultrastructural and microbiological analysis.
RESULTS
The results of the Meares-Stamey test showed only 1 of 10 patients (10%) with positive cultures for Escherichia coli. Two of five patients (40%) had positive cultures from prostate biopsy specimens. Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus raffinosus, and Citrobacter freundii were isolated. Ultrastructural analysis of the prostate biopsy specimens showed prostate calcifications in 6 of 10 patients (60%), and a structured microbial biofilm in 1 patient who had positive cultures for E. faecalis and E. raffinosus.
CONCLUSIONS
Although the findings are supported by a low number of patients, this study highlights the validity of the proposed methodology for investigating the role of bacterial biofilms in the genesis of prostate calcification.

Keyword

Biofilms; Prostate; Prostate diseases; Prostatitis

MeSH Terms

Biofilms*
Biopsy
Citrobacter freundii
Enterococcus
Enterococcus faecalis
Escherichia coli
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Operating Rooms
Prostate*
Prostatectomy
Prostatitis
Ultrasonography

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) Prostate core biopsy specimen showing several calcifications (brighter areas) within the tissue (darker areas). (B) Calcifications varied in size from a few to several hundred micrometers. (C) At high magnification, the calcification surface showed a crystalline structure with protein residuals and a possible extracellular polymeric matrix from the microbial biofilm. Scanning electron microscopy images were realized by collecting the signal from back-scattered electrons, giving compositional contrast between tissue and calcifications. (A) ×39, (B) ×500, (C) ×10,000.

  • Fig. 2 (A) Prostate core biopsy specimen with calcifications and corpora amylacea (brighter areas) within the tissue (darker areas). (B) High-magnification details of some round-shaped structures, morphologically compatible with corpora amylacea. (C) Intratissual aggregate of microorganisms with coccoid morphology with extracellular polymeric matrix (microbial biofilm). Scanning electron microscopy images were realized by collecting the signal from back-scattered electrons (A) or secondary electrons to have the highest morphological detail. (A) ×100, (B) ×2,000, (C) ×8,000.


Reference

1. Yang HJ, Huang KH, Wang CW, Chang HC, Yang TK. Prostate calcification worsen lower urinary tract symptoms in middle-aged men. Urology. 2013; 81:1320–1324. PMID: 23561714.
Article
2. Suh JH, Gardner JM, Kee KH, Shen S, Ayala AG, Ro JY. Calcifications in prostate and ejaculatory system: a study on 298 consecutive whole mount sections of prostate from radical prostatectomy or cystoprostatectomy specimens. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2008; 12:165–170. PMID: 18486891.
Article
3. Torres Ramírez C, Aguilar Ruiz J, Zuluaga Gómez A, del Río Sámper S, Issa Khozouz N. Structure of primary prostatic endogenous calculi. Arch Esp Urol. 1979; 32:581–590. PMID: 556206.
4. Sfanos KS, Wilson BA, De Marzo AM, Isaacs WB. Acute inflammatory proteins constitute the organic matrix of prostatic corpora amylacea and calculi in men with prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106:3443–3448. PMID: 19202053.
Article
5. Geramoutsos I, Gyftopoulos K, Perimenis P, Thanou V, Liagka D, Siamblis D, et al. Clinical correlation of prostatic lithiasis with chronic pelvic pain syndromes in young adults. Eur Urol. 2004; 45:333–337. PMID: 15036679.
Article
6. Klimas R, Bennett B, Gardner WA Jr. Prostatic calculi: a review. Prostate. 1985; 7:91–96. PMID: 3909127.
Article
7. Shoskes DA, Lee CT, Murphy D, Kefer J, Wood HM. Incidence and significance of prostatic stones in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Urology. 2007; 70:235–238. PMID: 17826477.
Article
8. Kanamaru S, Kurazono H, Terai A, Monden K, Kumon H, Mizunoe Y, et al. Increased biofilm formation in Escherichia coli isolated from acute prostatitis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006; 28:S21–S25. PMID: 16828264.
Article
9. Bartoletti R, Cai T, Nesi G, Albanese S, Meacci F, Mazzoli S, et al. The impact of biofilm-producing bacteria on chronic bacterial prostatitis treatment: results from a longitudinal cohort study. World J Urol. 2014; 32:737–742. PMID: 23918259.
Article
10. Giubilei G, Mondaini N, Crisci A, Raugei A, Lombardi G, Travaglini F, et al. The Italian version of the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index. Eur Urol. 2005; 47:805–811. PMID: 15925077.
Article
11. Badía X, García-Losa M, Dal-Ré R. Ten-language translation and harmonization of the International Prostate Symptom Score: developing a methodology for multinational clinical trials. Eur Urol. 1997; 31:129–140. PMID: 9076454.
12. Mazzoli S, Cai T, Rupealta V, Gavazzi A, Castricchi Pagliai R, Mondaini N, et al. Interleukin 8 and anti-chlamydia trachomatis mucosal IgA as urogenital immunologic markers in patients with C. trachomatis prostatic infection. Eur Urol. 2007; 51:1385–1393. PMID: 17107749.
Article
13. Cai T, Wagenlehner FM, Mazzoli S, Meacci F, Mondaini N, Nesi G, et al. Semen quality in patients with Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection treated concurrently with prulifloxacin and a phytotherapeutic agent. J Androl. 2012; 33:615–623. PMID: 21979301.
Article
14. Cai T, Caola I, Tessarolo F, Piccoli F, D'Elia C, Caciagli P, et al. Solidago, orthosiphon, birch and cranberry extracts can decrease microbial colonization and biofilm development in indwelling urinary catheter: a microbiologic and ultrastructural pilot study. World J Urol. 2014; 32:1007–1014. PMID: 24092275.
Article
15. Cai T, Tiscione D, Caola I, Tessarolo N, Mondaini F, Meacci G, et al. Prostate calcifications and LUTS: the potential role of bacterial biofilm and prostate inflammation. Eur Urol Suppl. 2014; 13:e561.
16. Thomas BA, Robert JT. Prostatic calculi. J Urol. 1927; 18:470–493.
Article
17. Finkle AL. The relationship of antecedent genito-urinary infections to the development of prostatic calculi and carcinoma. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1953; 29:585–586. PMID: 13051704.
18. Eykyn S, Bultitude MI, Mayo ME, Lloyd-Davies RW. Prostatic calculi as a source of recurrent bacteriuria in the male. Br J Urol. 1974; 46:527–532. PMID: 4609168.
Article
19. Meares EM Jr. Infection stones of prostate gland. Laboratory diagnosis and clinical management. Urology. 1974; 4:560–566. PMID: 4215187.
20. Dessombz A, Méria P, Bazin D, Daudon M. Prostatic stones: evidence of a specific chemistry related to infection and presence of bacterial imprints. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e51691. PMID: 23272143.
Article
21. Soto SM, Smithson A, Martinez JA, Horcajada JP, Mensa J, Vila J. Biofilm formation in uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains: relationship with prostatitis, urovirulence factors and antimicrobial resistance. J Urol. 2007; 177:365–368. PMID: 17162092.
Article
22. Lewis K. Multidrug tolerance of biofilms and persister cells. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2008; 322:107–131. PMID: 18453274.
Article
23. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microrganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002; 15:167–193. PMID: 11932229.
24. Kim WB, Doo SW, Yang WJ, Song YS. Influence of prostatic calculi on lower urinary tract symptoms in middle-aged men. Urology. 2011; 78:447–449. PMID: 21689847.
Article
25. Kwon YK, Choe MS, Seo KW, Park CH, Chang HS, Kim BH, et al. The effect of intraprostatic chronic inflammation on benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment. Korean J Urol. 2010; 51:266–270. PMID: 20428430.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ICU
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr