1). Baek SK, Ha MS. Analysis of the results endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy related to nasal cavity state. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2014; 55:633–9.
Article
2). Kwon YA, Kim HC, Ha MS, et al. Success rates according to the shape of rhinostomy after endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2009; 50:14–8.
Article
3). Shin HM, Lew H, Yun YS. Surgical result of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy according to opening size of nasal mucosa. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2006; 47:175–80.
4). Kim J, Kim H. Characteristics in patients with and without previous dacryocystitis and satisfaction after endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2017; 58:1–6.
Article
5). Shin IH, Lim HB, Lee JJ, Lee SB. Prognostic factors for successful endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2015; 56:1661–6.
Article
6). Park HI, Lee KW, Kang SM. Prognostic factors associated with surgical time of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2017; 58:757–62.
Article
7). Jung JJ, Jang SY, Jang JW, In JH. Comparison result of silicone tube intubation according to syringing and dacryocystography. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2014; 55:1584–8.
8). Jeong HW, Cho NC, Ahn M. Result of silicone tube intubation in patients with epiphora who showing normal finding in dacryocystography. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:706–12.
Article
9). Nemet AY. The etiology of epiphora: a multifactorial issue. Semin Ophthalmol. 2016; 31:275–9.
Article
10). Ewing AE. Roentogen ray demonstrations of the lacrimal abscess cavity. Am J Ophthalmol. 1909; 26:1–4.
11). Kim CH, Lew H, Yun YS. Correspodence among the canaliculus irrigation test, dacryocystography and Jones test in the epiphora patients. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:1017–22.
12). Kim JS, Ahn M. Clinical evaluation and classification of nasolacrimal duct obstruction site by dacryocystography. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2005; 46:191–5.
13). Kim TH, Lee JH, Ahn JH, et al. Dacryocystographic findings in unilateral epiphora with patent lacrimal drainage system. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2013; 54:839–44.
Article
14). Lee DP, Yang SW, Choi WC. The relation between nasal cavity size and success rate in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2000; 41:1118–23.
15). Lee YJ, Moon SW, Cho HY, Jeong JH. Clinical outcome of dacryocystorhinostomy with septal deviation. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:713–20.
Article
16). Lim IS, Jeong SK, Park YG. A study of factors related to surgical success rate of dacyocystorhinostomy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1997; 38:1322–7.
17). Dave TV, Mohammed FA, Ali MJ, Naik MN. Etiologic analysis of 100 anatomically failed dacryocystorhinostomies. Clinical Ophthalmol. 2016; 10:1419–22.
18). Lee HC, Chung WS. Success rate of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1996; 37:211–8.
19). Kim JH, Kim JM, Woo KI. The role of dacryocystography in evaluation of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2006; 47:1713–9.
20). Nomura K, Arakawa K, Sugawara M, et al. Factors influencing endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy outcome. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017; 274:2773–7.
Article
21). Yung MW, Hardman-Lea S. Analysis of the results of surgical endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: effect of the level of obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002; 86:792–4.
Article
22). Choi JC, Jin HR, Moon YE, et al. The surgical outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy according to the obstruction levels of lacrimal drainage system. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2009; 2:141–4.
Article
23). Rose GE. The lacrimal paradox: toward a greater understanding of success in lacrimal surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 20:262–5.
Article