J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  1998 Jan;39(1):17-24.

Clinical Experience of Lacrimal Surgery

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Opthalmology, Fatima Hospital, Taegu, Korea.

Abstract

The success rate of endonasal lacrimal surgery have been reported inferior to that of external lacrimal surgery. But nowadays, owing to developement of surgical instrument, such as endoscope, and improvement of surgical skill, better success rates have been reported. We have performed endonasal lacrimal surgery in 36 eyes of 34 patients and external lacrimal surgery in 41 eyes of 36 patients who have had lacriaml pathway obstruction confirmed by dacryocystography. Endonasal lacrimal surgery has been performed with endoscope, fiberoptic light pipe, and conventional lacrimal surgery instruments. Primary success rates are 84.0% in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), 89.5% in external DCR, 81.8% in endonasal conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy(CDCR), and 90.9% in external CDCR. The rate of postoperative complications are 32.0% in endonasal DCR, 47.4%, in external DCR, 27.3% in endonasal CDCR, and 40.9% in external CDCR. Therefore, in order to increase the success rate of endonasal lacrimal surgery, improvement of surgical technique, use of adequate surgical instrument and careful followup examination for proper management of postoperative complicaitons are considered essential.

Keyword

Endonasal lacrimal surgery; Endoscope; Fiberoptic light pipe

MeSH Terms

Dacryocystorhinostomy
Endoscopes
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Postoperative Complications
Surgical Instruments
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr