Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Neurosurg Soc.  2018 Mar;61(2):258-266. 10.3340/jkns.2017.0188.

Sacral Insufficiency Fractures: How to Classify?

Affiliations
  • 1Hannover Region Public Health Department, Hannover Region, Hannover, Germany. gesabakker@gmx.de
  • 2Department for Radiology and Neuroradiology, KRH Nordstadt, Hannover, Germany.
  • 3Institute for Medical Statistics, Computer Science and Epidemiology IMSIE, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • 4Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, KRH Nordstadt, Hannover, Germany.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
The diagnosis of insufficiency fractures of the sacrum in an elder population increases annually. Fractures show very different morphology. We aimed to classify sacral insufficiency fractures according to the position of cortical break and possible need for intervention.
METHODS
Between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2014, all patients with a proven fracture of the sacrum following a low-energy or an even unnoticed trauma were prospectively registered : 117 females and 13 males. All patients had a computer tomography of the pelvic ring, two patients had a magnetic resonance imaging additionally : localization and involvement of the fracture lines into the sacroiliac joint, neural foramina or the spinal canal were identified.
RESULTS
Patients were aged between 46 and 98 years (mean, 79.8 years). Seventy-seven patients had an unilateral fracture of the sacral ala, 41 bilateral ala fractures and 12 patients showed a fracture of the sacral corpus : a total of 171 fractures were analyzed. The first group A included fractures of the sacral ala which were assessed to have no or less mechanical importance (n=53) : fractures with no cortical disruption ("bone bruise") (A1; n=2), cortical deformation of the anterior cortical bone (A2; n=4), and fracture of the anterolateral rim of ala (A3; n=47). Complete fractures of the sacral ala (B; n=106) : parallel to the sacroiliac joint (B1; n=63), into the sacroiliac joint (B2; n=19), and involvement of the sacral foramina respectively the spinal canal (B3; n=24). Central fractures involving the sacral corpus (C; n=12) : fracture limited to the corpus or finishing into one ala (C1; n=3), unidirectional including the neural foramina or the spinal canal or both (C2; n=2), and horizontal fractures of the corpus with bilateral sagittal completion (C3; n=8). Sixty-eight fractures proceeded into the sacroiliac joint, 34 fractures showed an injury of foramina or canal.
CONCLUSION
The new classification allowes the differentiation of fractures of less mechanical importance and a risk assessment for possible polymethyl methacrylate leaks during sacroplasty in the direction of the neurological structures. In addition, identification of instable fractures in need for laminectomy and surgical stabilization is possible.

Keyword

Insufficiency fractures; Sacrum; Classification; Cementoplasty

MeSH Terms

Cementoplasty
Classification
Diagnosis
Female
Fractures, Stress*
Humans
Laminectomy
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Polymethyl Methacrylate
Prospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Sacroiliac Joint
Sacrum
Spinal Canal
Polymethyl Methacrylate
Full Text Links
  • JKNS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2026 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr