Ann Surg Treat Res.  2017 Jul;93(1):43-49. 10.4174/astr.2017.93.1.43.

Clinical implication of discrepancies between surgical and pathologic diagnoses of acute appendicitis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Korea. surgeryjun@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
The postoperative treatment after appendectomy is usually decided on the basis of the surgeons' intraoperative findings. Comparatively, the pathologic diagnosis of appendicitis is confirmed several days after the surgery; therefore, it usually does not affect the postoperative treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to investigate the discrepancies between the surgical and pathologic diagnoses of appendicitis and to identify their clinical implication.
METHODS
A retrospective observational study was performed in 1,817 patients who underwent 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for the final diagnosis of appendicitis. The clinical variables that could estimate the severity of appendicitis and the intensity of postoperative treatment were analyzed and compared according to the surgical and pathologic diagnoses.
RESULTS
Of 1,321 cases of surgically simple appendicitis, 254 (29.3%) were pathologically complicated appendicitis. On the other hand, 221 of 496 cases (44.5%) of surgically complicated appendicitis were pathologically simple. Neither the surgical nor the pathologic diagnosis of appendicitis affected the development of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess (P = 0.079 for surgical diagnosis; P = 0.288 for pathologic diagnosis); however, the surgical diagnosis showed more correlation with the severity of disease and the intensity of the treatment pathway than did the pathologic diagnosis.
CONCLUSION
There were discrepancies between the surgeons' intraoperative assessment and the pathologists' final histologic diagnosis of appendicitis. The surgeon's classification might be more predictive of the outcome than the pathologist's because only the surgeon's findings are available immediately after surgery.

Keyword

Appendicitis; Appendectomy; Laparoscopy; Pathology

Cited by  1 articles

Correlation of histological diagnosis and laboratory findings in distinguishing acute appendicitis and lymphoid hyperplasia
Keziban Ucar Karabulut, Hilal Erinanc, Aynur Yonar, Alpaslan Kisinma, Yildiz Ucar
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2022;103(5):306-311.    doi: 10.4174/astr.2022.103.5.306.


Reference

1. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002; (1):CD001546.
2. Correa J, Jimeno J, Vallverdu H, Bizzoca C, Collado-Roura F, Estalella L, et al. Correlation between intraoperative surgical diagnosis of complicated acute appendicitis and the pathology report: clinical implications. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015; 16:41–44.
3. Jones AE, Phillips AW, Jarvis JR, Sargen K. The value of routine histopathological examination of appendicectomy specimens. BMC Surg. 2007; 7:17.
4. Kim KH, Lee SC, Lee SK, Choi BJ, Jeong W, Kim SJ. Does Korea's current diagnosis-related group-based reimbursement system appropriately classify appendectomy patients. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016; 91:66–73.
5. Cho J, Park I, Lee D, Sung K, Baek J, Lee J. Risk factors for postoperative intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy: analysis for consecutive 1,817 experiences. Dig Surg. 2015; 32:375–381.
6. Fallon SC, Kim ME, Hallmark CA, Carpenter JL, Eldin KW, Lopez ME, et al. Correlating surgical and pathological diagnoses in pediatric appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2015; 50:638–641.
7. Bliss D, Mckee J, Cho D, Krishnaswami S, Zallen G, Harrison M, et al. Discordance of the pediatric surgeon's intraoperative assessment of pediatric appendicitis with the pathologists report. J Pediatr Surg. 2010; 45:1398–1403.
8. Garst GC, Moore EE, Banerjee MN, Leopold DK, Burlew CC, Bensard DD, et al. Acute appendicitis: a disease severity score for the acute care surgeon. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013; 74:32–36.
9. St Peter SD, Sharp SW, Holcomb GW 3rd, Ostlie DJ. An evidence-based definition for perforated appendicitis derived from a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2008; 43:2242–2245.
10. Dhupar R, Evankovich J, Ochoa JB, Vargas LG, Hughes SJ. Outcomes of operative management of appendicitis. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2012; 13:141–146.
11. Cho J, Park I, Lee D, Sung K, Baek J, Lee J. Antimicrobial treatment after laparoscopic appendectomy for preventing a post-operative intraabdominal abscess: a prospective cohort study of 1817 patients. Int J Surg. 2016; 27:142–146.
12. Gomes CA, Nunes TA, Fonseca Chebli JM, Junior CS, Gomes CC. Laparoscopy grading system of acute appendicitis: new insight for future trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012; 22:463–466.
13. Ponsky TA, Hafi M, Heiss K, Dinsmore J, Newman KD, Gilbert J. Interobserver variation in the assessment of appendiceal perforation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009; 19:Suppl 1. S15–S18.
Full Text Links
  • ASTR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr