J Vet Sci.  2012 Dec;13(4):395-403.

Comparative study of pandemic (H1N1) 2009, swine H1N1, and avian H3N2 influenza viral infections in quails

Affiliations
  • 1Interdepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Graduate School, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
  • 2Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases in Animals (CUEIDAs), Research Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
  • 3Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
  • 4Department of Veterinary Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand. okanisak@hotmail.com
  • 5Department of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.

Abstract

Quail has been proposed to be an intermediate host of influenza A viruses. However, information on the susceptibility and pathogenicity of pandemic H1N1 2009 (pH1N1) and swine influenza viruses in quails is limited. In this study, the pathogenicity, virus shedding, and transmission characteristics of pH1N1, swine H1N1 (swH1N1), and avian H3N2 (dkH3N2) influenza viruses in quails was examined. Three groups of 15 quails were inoculated with each virus and evaluated for clinical signs, virus shedding and transmission, pathological changes, and serological responses. None of the 75 inoculated (n = 45), contact exposed (n = 15), or negative control (n = 15) quails developed any clinical signs. In contrast to the low virus shedding titers observed from the swH1N1-inoculated quails, birds inoculated with dkH3N2 and pH1N1 shed relatively high titers of virus predominantly from the respiratory tract until 5 and 7 DPI, respectively, that were rarely transmitted to the contact quails. Gross and histopathological lesions were observed in the respiratory and intestinal tracts of quail inoculated with either pH1N1 or dkH3N2, indicating that these viruses were more pathogenic than swH1N1. Sero-conversions were detected 7 DPI in two out of five pH1N1-inoculated quails, three out of five quails inoculated with swH1N1, and four out of five swH1N1-infected contact birds. Taken together, this study demonstrated that quails were more susceptible to infection with pH1N1 and dkH3N2 than swH1N1.

Keyword

avian H3N2 virus; infection; pandemic H1N1 2009 virus; quail; swine H1N1 virus

MeSH Terms

Birds
Influenza A virus
Influenza, Human
Orthomyxoviridae
Pandemics
Quail
Respiratory System
Swine
Virus Shedding
Viruses

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Gross lesions in quails infected with pandemic H1N1 2009 (pH1N1; A and B) and mock-inoculated birds (C and D). (A) Lung, 7 DPI. The pH1N1-inoculated quail exhibited moderate lung congestion. (B) Duodenum loop and pancreas, 7 DPI. Moderate congestion at the duodenal serosal surface in pH1N1-inoculated quails was observed. (C) Lung and (D) duodenum loop of mock-inoculated control quails 7 DPI.

  • Fig. 2 Histopathology and immunohistochemistry findings of quails inoculated with pH1N1 and Thai duck H3N2 (dkH3N2), respectively. Photomicrographs of H&E-stained tissue sections from pH1N1-inoculated quails (A~F) and immunohistochemically stained section to detect influenza A virus (IAV) antigen 3 DPI in a quail inoculated with dkH3N2 (G and H). (A and B) Sections from quail trachea showed mild to moderate tracheitis with infiltration of inflammatory cells in the submucosa. (C and D) Sections from quail lung exhibited mild to moderate bronchitis and peribronchiolar cuffing. (E and F) Sections from quail duodenum displayed moderate duodenitis with inflammatory cells infiltration. Viral antigen (G and H) was stained red-brown on a hematoxylin-stained background and viral antigen (arrows) was observed in macrophages in the duodenum. Scale bars = 500 µm (E), 50 µm (A, C, and G), and 20 µm (B, D, F, and H).


Reference

1. Campagnolo ER, Rankin JT, Daverio SA, Hunt EA, Lute JR, Tewari D, Acland HM, Ostrowski SR, Moll ME, Urdaneta VV, Ostroff SM. Fatal pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza A virus infection in a Pennsylvania domestic cat. Zoonoses Public Health. 2011. 58:500–507.
Article
2. Forrest HL, Kim JK, Webster RG. Virus shedding and potential for interspecies waterborne transmission of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus in sparrows and chickens. J Virol. 2010. 84:3718–3720.
Article
3. Guan Y, Peiris JSM, Lipatov AS, Ellis TM, Dyrting KC, Krauss S, Zhang LJ, Webster RG, Shortridge KF. Emergence of multiple genotypes of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in Hong Kong SAR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002. 99:8950–8955.
Article
4. Humberd J, Guan Y, Webster RG. Comparison of the replication of influenza A viruses in Chinese ring-necked pheasants and chukar partridges. J Virol. 2006. 80:2151–2161.
Article
5. Ilyushina NA, Kim JK, Negovetich NJ, Choi YK, Lang V, Bovin NV, Forrest HL, Song MS, Pascua PNQ, Kim CJ, Webster RG, Webby RJ. Extensive mammalian ancestry of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010. 16:314–317.
Article
6. Itoh Y, Shinya K, Kiso M, Watanabe T, Sakoda Y, Hatta M, Muramoto Y, Tamura D, Sakai-Tagawa Y, Noda T, Sakabe S, Imai M, Hatta Y, Watanabe S, Li C, Yamada S, Fujii K, Murakami S, Imai H, Kakugawa S, Ito M, Takano R, Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, Shimojima M, Horimoto T, Goto H, Takahashi K, Makino A, Ishigaki H, Nakayama M, Okamatsu M, Takahashi K, Warshauer D, Shult PA, Saito R, Suzuki H, Furuta Y, Yamashita M, Mitamura K, Nakano K, Nakamura M, Brockman-Schneider R, Mitamura H, Yamazaki M, Sugaya N, Suresh M, Ozawa M, Neumann G, Gern J, Kida H, Ogasawara K, Kawaoka Y. In vitro and in vivo characterization of new swine-origin H1N1 influenza viruses. Nature. 2009. 460:1021–1025.
Article
7. Jones YL, Swayne DE. Comparative pathobiology of low and high pathogenicity H7N3 Chilean avian influenza viruses in chickens. Avian Dis. 2004. 48:119–128.
Article
8. Kitikoon P, Nilubol D, Erickson BJ, Janke BH, Hoover TC, Sornsen SA, Thacker EL. The immune response and maternal antibody interference to a heterologous H1N1 swine influenza virus infection following vaccination. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2006. 112:117–128.
Article
9. Kitikoon P, Sreta D, Na Ayudhya SN, Wongphatcharachai M, Lapkuntod J, Prakairungnamthip D, Bunpapong N, Suradhat S, Thanawongnuwech R, Amonsin A. Brief report: molecular characterization of a novel reassorted pandemic H1N1 2009 in Thai pigs. Virus Genes. 2011. 43:1–5.
Article
10. Liu M, He S, Walker D, Zhou N, Perez DR, Mo B, Li F, Huang X, Webster RG, Webby RJ. The influenza virus gene pool in a poultry market in South central China. Virology. 2003. 305:267–275.
Article
11. Makarova NV, Ozaki H, Kida H, Webster RG, Perez DR. Replication and transmission of influenza viruses in Japanese quail. Virology. 2003. 310:8–15.
Article
12. Mathieu C, Moreno V, Retamal P, Gonzalez A, Rivera A, Fuller J, Jara C, Lecocq C, Rojas M, Garcia A, Vasquez M, Agredo M, Gutiérrez C, Escobar H, Fasce R, Mora J, Garcia J, Fernández J, Ternicier C, Avalos P. Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 in breeding turkeys, Valparaiso, Chile. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010. 16:709–711.
Article
13. Mo IP, Brugh M, Fletcher OJ, Rowland GN, Swayne DE. Comparative pathology of chickens experimentally inoculated with avian influenza viruses of low and high pathogenicity. Avian Dis. 1997. 41:125–136.
Article
14. Mutinelli F, Capua I, Terregino C, Cattoli G. Clinical, gross, and microscopic findings in different avian species naturally infected during the H7N1 low- and high-pathogenicity avian influenza epidemics in Italy during 1999 and 2000. Avian Dis. 2003. 47:844–848.
Article
15. Nardelli L, Rinaldi A, Pereira HG, Mandelli G. Influenza virus infections in Japanese quails. Arch Exp Veterinarmed. 1970. 24:231–249.
16. Nfon C, Berhane Y, Zhang S, Handel K, Labrecque O, Pasick J. Molecular and antigenic characterization of triple-reassortant H3N2 swine influenza viruses isolated from pigs, turkey and quail in Canada. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2011. 58:394–401.
Article
17. Nili H, Asasi K, Dadras H, Ebrahimi M. Pathobiology of H9N2 avian influenza virus in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Avian Dis. 2007. 51:1 Suppl. 390–392.
Article
18. Pereda A, Cappuccio J, Quiroga MA, Baumeister E, Insarralde L, Ibar M, Sanguinetti R, Cannilla ML, Franzese D, Escobar Cabrera OE, Craig MI, Rimondi A, Machuca M, Debenedetti RT, Zenobi C, Barral L, Balzano R, Capalbo S, Risso A, Perfumo CJ. Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 outbreak on pig farm, Argentina. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010. 16:304–307.
Article
19. Perez DR, Webby RJ, Hoffmann E, Webster RG. Land-based birds as potential disseminators of avian/mammalian reassortant influenza A viruses. Avian Dis. 2003. 47:3 Suppl. 1114–1117.
Article
20. Pillai SPS, Pantin-Jackwood M, Suarez DL, Saif YM, Lee CW. Pathobiological characterization of low-pathogenicity H5 avian influenza viruses of diverse origins in chickens, ducks and turkeys. Arch Virol. 2010. 155:1439–1451.
Article
21. Reed LJ, Muench H. A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am J Hyg. 1938. 27:493–497.
22. Saito T, Watanabe C, Takemae N, Chaisingh A, Uchida Y, Buranathai C, Suzuki H, Okamatsu M, Imada T, Parchariyanon S, Traiwanatam N, Yamaguchi S. Pathogenicity of highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses of H5N1 subtype isolated in Thailand for different poultry species. Vet Microbiol. 2009. 133:65–74.
Article
23. Smith GJD, Vijaykrishna D, Bahl J, Lycett SJ, Worobey M, Pybus OG, Ma SK, Cheung CL, Raghwani J, Bhatt S, Peiris JSM, Guan Y, Rambaut A. Origins and evolutionary genomics of the 2009 swine-origin H1N1 influenza A epidemic. Nature. 2009. 459:1122–1125.
Article
24. Sreta D, Kedkovid R, Tuamsang S, Kitikoon P, Thanawongnuwech R. Pathogenesis of swine influenza virus (Thai isolates) in weanling pigs: an experimental trial. Virol J. 2009. 6:34.
Article
25. Sreta D, Tantawet S, Na Ayudhya SN, Thontiravong A, Wongphatcharachai M, Lapkuntod J, Bunpapong N, Tuanudom R, Suradhat S, Vimolket L, Poovorawan Y, Thanawongnuwech R, Amonsin A, Kitikoon P. Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus on commercial swine farm, Thailand. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010. 16:1587–1590.
Article
26. Suzuki Y, Ito T, Suzuki T, Holland RE Jr, Chambers TM, Kiso M, Ishida H, Kawaoka Y. Sialic acid species as a determinant of the host range of influenza A viruses. J Virol. 2000. 74:11825–11831.
Article
27. Swayne DE, Pantin-Jackwood M, Kapczynski D, Spackman E, Suarez DL. Susceptibility of poultry to pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009. 15:2061–2063.
Article
28. Tashiro M, Reinacher M, Rott R. Aggravation of pathogenicity of an avian influenza virus by adaptation to quails. Arch Virol. 1987. 93:81–95.
Article
29. Van Reeth K. Avian and swine influenza viruses: our current understanding of the zoonotic risk. Vet Res. 2007. 38:243–260.
Article
30. Wan H, Perez DR. Quail carry sialic acid receptors compatible with binding of avian and human influenza viruses. Virology. 2006. 346:278–286.
Article
31. Webster RG, Guan Y, Peiris M, Walker D, Krauss S, Zhou NN, Govorkova EA, Ellis TM, Dyrting KC, Sit T, Perez DR, Shortridge KF. Characterization of H5N1 influenza viruses that continue to circulate in geese in southeastern China. J Virol. 2002. 76:118–126.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JVS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr