1. Latina MA, Park C. Selective targeting of trabecular meshwork cells: in vitro studies of pulsed and CW laser interactions. Exp Eye Res. 1995; 60:359–71.
Article
2. Lai JS, Chua JK, Tham CC, Lam DS. Five-year follow up of se-lective laser trabeculoplasty in Chinese eyes. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004; 32:368–72.
Article
3. McIlraith I, Strasfeld M, Colev G, Hutnik CM. Selective laser tra-beculoplasty as initial and adjunctive treatment for open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2006; 15:124–30.
Article
4. Juzych MS, Chopra V, Banitt MR. . Comparison of long-term outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty versus argon laser tra-beculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111:1853–9.
Article
5. Song J, Lee PP, Epstein DL. . High failure rate associated with 180 selective laser trabeculoplasty. J Glaucoma. 2005; 14:400–8.
Article
6. Ayala M, Chen E. Comparison of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in primary open angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011; 5:1469–73.
Article
7. Stein JD, Challa P. Mechanisms of action and efficacy of argon la-ser trabeculoplasty and selective laser trabeculoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007; 18:140–5.
Article
8. Latina MA, Gulati V. Selective laser trabeculoplasty: stimulating the meshwork to mend its ways. Internati Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2004; 44:93–103.
Article
9. Moon SJ, Choi ES, Park JI, Lee KH. Two-year follow-up of se-lective laser trabeculoplasty as initial and adjunctive treatment for ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2010; 51:974–80.
Article
10. Park JJ, Lee JW, Lee KW. Comparison of clinical outcomes of ar-gon laser versus selective laser trabeculoplasty in POAG. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:1491–500.
Article
11. Park HJ, Park JW. Effect of prior cataract surgery on the clinical outcome of selective laser trabeculoplasty. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2015; 56:911–6.
Article
12. Jang YS, Kim JM, Lim TH. . Comparison of 180 and 360 se-lective laser trabeculoplasty. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2012; 53:291–6.
Article
13. Lee JW, Kim EJ, Lee TY, Lee KW. Comparison of efficacy and safety between superior 180 degree and inferior 180 degree se-lective laser trabeculoplasty. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2012; 53:1642–8.
Article
14. Lee JY, Lee YK, Moon JI, Park MH. Long-term outcomes and pre-dictive factors for success of selective laser trabeculoplasty. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2014; 55:1347–54.
Article
15. O’conor DJ, Caprioli J. Comparison of methods to detect glaucom-atous damage. Ophthalmology. 1993; 100:1498–503.
16. Suh W, Jun RM, Choi KR. Longitudinal analysis of retinal nerve fi-ber layer thickness with GDx-VCC in glaucoma suspect. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2009; 50:235–41.
Article
17. Kim DY, Singh A. Severe iritis and choroidal effusion following selective laser trabeculoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008; 39:409–11.
Article
18. Song J. Complications of selective laser trabeculoplasty: a review. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016; 10:137–43.
Article
19. Hodge WG, Damji KF, Rock W. . Baseline IOP predicts se-lective laser trabeculoplasty success at 1 year post-treatment: re-sults from a randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005; 89:1157–60.
Article
20. Weinand FS, Althen F. Long-term clinical results of selective laser trabeculoplasty in the treatment of primary open angle glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2006; 16:100–4.
Article
21. Sayin N, Alkin Z, Ozkaya A. . Efficacy of selective laser trabe-culoplasty in medically uncontrolled glaucoma. ISRN Ophthalmol. 2013; 2013:975281.
Article
22. Gracner T, Naji M, Hudovernik M. . Predictive factors of suc-cessful selective laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2007; 224:922–6.
23. Busbee BG, Recchia FM, Kaiser R. . Bleb-associated endoph-thalmitis: clinical characteristics and visual outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111:1495–503 discussion 1503.
24. DeBry PW, Perkins TW, Heatley G. . Incidence of late-onset bleb-related complications following trabeculectomy with mitomycin. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120:297–300.
Article
25. Jampel HD, Musch DC, Gillespie BW. . Perioperative compli-cations of trabeculectomy in the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study (CIGTS). Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 140:16–22.
Article
26. Gracner T. Intraocular pressure response to selective laser trabecu-loplasty in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmologica. 2001; 215:267–70.
Article
27. The Glaucoma Laser Trial (GLT). 2. Results of argon laser trabecu-loplasty versus topical medicines. The Glaucoma Laser Trial Research Group. Ophthalmology. 1990; 97:1403–13.
28. Reiss GR, Wilensky JT, Higginbotham EJ. Laser trabeculoplasty. Surv Ophthalmol. 1991; 35:407–28.
Article
29. Ederer F, Gaasterland DA, Dally LG. . The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 13. Comparison of treatment outcomes within race: 10-year results. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111:651–64.
30. Prasad N, Murthy S, Dagianis JJ, Latina MA. A comparison of the intervisit intraocular pressure fluctuation after 180 and 360 degrees of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) as a primary therapy in pri-mary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma. 2009; 18:157–60.
Article
31. Seymenoğ lu G, Baser EF. Efficacy of selective laser trabeculo-plasty in phakic and pseudophakic eyes. J Glaucoma. 2015; 24:105–10.
32. Shazly TA, Latina MA, Dagianis JJ, Chitturi S. Effect of prior cata-ract surgery on the long-term outcome of selective laser trabeculoplasty. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011; 5:377–80.
Article
33. Werner M, Smith MF, Doyle JW. Selective laser trabeculoplasty in phakic and pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2007; 38:182–8.
Article